A little boy of very vivid imagination came home to say that he had seen a very large snake. His mother inquired as to its size and the little boy held his hands about eight inches apart.
“Only that long?” asked the mother.
“Oh, very much longer,” said the little boy, “it was that wide.”
Let us make is clear immediately that we are not intimating that Mr. William Green or his contemporaries in the American Federation of Labor are seeing snakes. But we would like to say that they are seeing the public reaction to the Taft-Hartley Act out of all proportion.
Last summer this act was to “enslave labor.” The other day Mr. Green said that it would cause a sharp increase in the number of strikes during the next few months, and that the fewer strikes which had taken place since enactment were an illusion.
It seems to us that the American public, including the rank and file of union labor, has accepted the Taft-Hartley Act. The chances that it will be a major issue of the 1948 campaign are very small and the chances that it will be changed as a result of the November elections are equally small.
Things are not growing as wide as Mr. Green is seeing them.
(The Wall Street Journal, February 2, 1948)
The 1947 Taft-Hartley Act ensured that laborers could refuse to join unions or “participate in mutual aid activities” if they wanted, although their “condition of employment” could require them to join a union.
(nlrb.gov, “1947 Taft-Hartley Substantive Provisions”)