Rose Tyler Hate: Sexism and classism parading as anti racism
Saw a post calling Rose Tyler catty and describing her as someone who thinks expects to be more important than she is. Same poster goes on to degrade her for “making googly eyes” at the Doctor. As if being in love and showing it is a crime. They also describe her as the stereotypical girlfriend. Not the first time I’ve seen descriptions like this and other ones are usually followed up by how whiny she is.
And you know, these are all insults that are primarily reserved women. And they tend to come from people who also tout themselves as anti racism heroes. But here’s the thing, anti racism fundamentally does not work if it relies on classism and sexism.
Rose Tyler is exactly the kind of person society expects to be disposable. She didn’t complete her education, she lives on government housing, and to top it all off her personal brand of femininity is the one that that the patriarchy despises the most. She embodies the most stereotypical sides of femininity. Girly, soft, romantic, and sensitive are always traits that get twisted into whiny stereotypical girlfriend. Feminism means that all forms of womanhood and femininity are valid. Including the “boring” “stereotypical” girly girls.
Rose doesn’t want to be the most important woman in the universe but she does want to be special to the person she’s in love with. And that, apparently, for someone like her, is a crime.
The show subverts all this by showing such a person not as disposable but instead as immensely important. But unfortunately, instead of taking in that message, swaths of the fandom would rather choose to see her through the default disposable lens.
Rose’s flaws get magnified to double the degree other characters’s flaws are. Most people who hate her will cite her selfishness for leaving home and struggling to firmly communicate the end of her relationship with Mickey, but won’t see an issue with Clara being willing to abandon the Doctor on a volcano for her own interests or with River mind wiping a man whenever she’s bored. Rose is relatively really tame in terms of character flaws but many bystanders of the fandom might actually think she’s the most morally questionable!
Then there’s the issue where fans of Rose Tyler are frequently infantalised. Being a Rose fan and enjoying her brand of femininity is seen as something people should “grow out of”. People will even directly post about being too mature for Doctorrose all the time. This is especially concerning since a large chunk of Rose and Doctorrose fans are women or men and nonbinary people who identify strongly with femininity.
As the Indian and Black daughter of an immigrant I am seen as disposable and worthy of disdain by society for different reasons than Rose Tyler. But the result is often very much the same and that’s why I relate to her anyway.
Yes, there’s much more work to do. More proper and thought out representation of other types of minorities is necessary. Absolutely. But we have had a great example of subverted societal expectations of what someone’s “place” is since 2005 and it is possible to enjoy that and hope for more at the same time.
Sexist and classist anti racism isn’t really anti racism. It’s just virtue signaling.


















