[ID: Anti-Freud, Freud Haters Only]
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Netherlands
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Philippines
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom

seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Norway

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Hong Kong SAR China
seen from Spain
seen from United States
seen from Brazil
[ID: Anti-Freud, Freud Haters Only]
If Freud keeps equating love with sexual attraction in his writings I swear I’m going to resurrect him just to smash his kneecaps. This is for you, aspecs. I’m mad.
Anti-Reylo Thoughts (11/3/20)
I have seen Reylo supporters say that they’re all for trans rights, despite being heavy into the concepts of the Feminine Womb Cave and the Masculine Phallus-Lightsaber, very likely because it’s meant to be symbolic/mental, not physical. However, even if it’s not meant to be biological, it’s still gender essentialist, which is all about gender stereotypes and oppositional sexism. Plus all the talk of symbolic wombs would be a big reminder to many trans people that they don’t have it.
my professor just say "now what was cool about freud"
no stop there's no good end to that sentence
ᴛᴀᴋᴇ sᴏᴍᴇ ᴛᴇxᴛ ʙᴏxᴇs ɪ ᴍᴀᴅᴇ
The moment when Fritz Perls realize that he is not the one and only anti-Freud!
Rudolf Allers or Michel Onfray, or may be Karl Kraus? Not you Fritz Perls.
@we-kant-even
Simply put, both Freud and Kraus were concerned with the fundamental problem of demarcation, separation, and classification: that is, with sorting out answers to the question "What or who belongs where?" This enterprise is, of course, fundamental to ethics and law, ideology and politics, and indeed to all matters pertaining to social conduct and control. Freud's basic aims were to annex morals to medicine, to create a cryptoreligious ideology and be its leader. Kraus's basic aims were to demonstrate the moral and political consequences of debauching language in the service of special interests--whether political or psychiatric, legal or journalistic--and to purify language and thus help individuals to protect themselves from the obfuscators and obfuscations of language. It is not surprising, then, that Freud and Kraus demarcated and classified things differently, and that the forms of their rhetoric faithfully reflect their respective goals and values.
Thomas Szasz, Anti-Freud: Karl Kraus’s Criticism of Psychoanalysis and Psychiatry
I must study Freud (derogatory) for 5 days in a row, someone please save me.