started watching taskmaster on youtube and it occurs to me that perhaps i really like an oddly specific type of show...
seen from Finland

seen from Belgium
seen from Argentina
seen from Netherlands

seen from United States
seen from Australia
seen from China

seen from Canada

seen from Germany
seen from T1
seen from Poland

seen from Latvia

seen from Russia
seen from China
seen from China
seen from India
seen from China
seen from Hong Kong SAR China
seen from Peru
seen from China
started watching taskmaster on youtube and it occurs to me that perhaps i really like an oddly specific type of show...
Human experience is structured in such a way that certain pursuits create deeper engagement with reality while others do not.
This brings us to the idea of performing arbitrary tasks tasks to escape the chain of cause and effect or to move closer to God. The reasoning behind those exercises often comes from mystical traditions like those of Gurdjieff or from interpretations of thinkers like Immanuel Kant and Arthur Schopenhauer. The claim is that when an action is performed without seeking reward or outcome such as washing an already clean floor then the person temporarily steps outside the usual cycle of desire and satisfaction. However, there is strong logical objection. The moment someone performs the action because it is supposed to bring them closer to God or spiritual freedom, the action already has a purpose and expected reward. The causal chain has not been broken; it has simply been disguised. Psychologically there can even be a stronger reward in the form of the feeling of spiritual progress or moral superiority.
Because of this, many critics argue that such exercises do not escape the logic of motivation at all. They simply replace ordinary rewards with more abstract ones like spiritual identity, purity, transcendence, or the belief that one is approaching ultimate truth. In that sense the phrase “spiritual masturbation” captures the criticism very directly, the activity may generate a feeling of significance without actually changing the underlying structure of desire.
There is, however, a more modest interpretation of such practices. Instead of claiming they break causality or bring someone closer to God, they can be seen as training attention. Performing a simple task without chasing reward forces the mind to notice how strongly it normally seeks gratification. The value is not metaphysical; it is psychological. The person becomes more aware of how motivation works inside their own mind.
This returns us to the unresolved issue of ambition and meaning. If the universe provides no ultimate purpose, then the only place where meaning can appear is within the functioning of the organism itself. Activities that deepen understanding, curiosity, and awareness may not matter cosmically, but they can transform the quality of a life from the inside. That transformation does not create universal meaning; it simply shapes the kind of experience a conscious being has while existing.
The path toward philosophy illustrates this very clearly. If you are you interested in philosophy or spiritual development and your motivation did not come from abstract ambition or a mystical goal but emerged from a need to understand experiences that were too painful or confusing to ignore, in that situation philosophy becomes less like a career or intellectual hobby and more like a tool for reorganizing one’s relationship to reality.