seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from Russia
seen from South Africa
seen from Poland
seen from Russia
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Yemen
seen from Malaysia
seen from Serbia
seen from Sweden
seen from United States
seen from South Africa
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
Courtesy of the Clydeside Pissers Union, enjoy three sticker designs for prettying up your favourite gay bar or making a stink in your local trans-exclusionary bog. For the occasions when 'a trans person used this bathroom and nobody got hurt' is no longer enough.
Like everything on Unprintable, these designs are public domain and free for you to use and share any way you like, forever!
What is Unprintable?
My existence "violates the dignity" of cis women according to the latest judgement
The court ruled the NHS trust did indirectly discriminate against and harass the nurses by allowing Trans+ people to use single sex spaces
I create a "hostile, humiliating and degrading environment" by being in the vicinity of cis women
Fuck this fucking country, fuck this fucking era.
Fuck the government, Fuck the courts. Why do rooms of old white men whose only knowledge of my people is from their spank bank decide if I should be allowed to live with dignity in peace? Why are we permitting religious extremists dictate the way the world should be?
This needs to burn, let a new one sweep away the ashes of our worlds hate.
Let the decaying cadaver expire, so another can live.
Fuck.
Death to the cis-scum.
A judge has blocked Idaho’s transgender bathroom ban law, calling it likely unconstitutional and too vague to enforce, days before it was du
A federal judge has blocked enforcement of key parts of Idaho’s new law that would criminalise transgender people for using public bathrooms that do not match their sex assigned at birth, finding the measure is likely unconstitutional. In a 30-page court decision issued on Tuesday (16 June), US District Judge Amanda K Brailsford granted a preliminary injunction days before the law was due to take effect on 1 July. House Bill 752, signed into law by Republican governor Brad Little this March, made it illegal to knowingly enter certain restrooms or changing rooms designated for the “opposite biological sex” in government-owned buildings and places of public accommodation, including private businesses open to the public.
Continue Reading.
Any trans/nonbinary folks have advice for Coeur d'Alene, Idaho?
I have an opportunity to see family who will be visiting Idaho/Canada in less than a month that I haven't seen in almost 10 years. Our invitation came after they'd already booked lodging, otherwise I would've asked if we could meet up in Spokane or something instead.
I'm nonbinary, but I think still generally perceived as a cis woman, though probably gender non conforming and I'm worried about the bathroom bans.
Is Coeur d'Alene generally a safer city? Are there any businesses/neighborhoods to definitely avoid? Am I overreacting? (Please *only* trans folks/enbies answer that last question.) Literally any information would be appreciated.
The bill is more extreme than a recent one vetoed by the governor.
"The bill contains a novel enforcement mechanism not seen in any other state. It declares that a transgender person "asserting" that their gender identity allows them to use the bathroom is against the law under the state civil rights act, turning civil rights protections that were meant to be protective of transgender people into a weapon against them. "It shall be unlawful for any person to assert that their gender identity is a sex other than that defined in RSA 21:3 for the purposes of accessing places or services restricted on the basis of sex," reads the bill. Such violations could result in fines of up to $5,000 per incident and even jail time if a person violates a resulting court injunction by continuing to use the restroom. The bill also contains provisions for private businesses. It permits any owner or operator of a "place of public accommodation"—a category that under New Hampshire law includes hotels, restaurants, theaters, retail stores, bars, and concert venues—to restrict bathrooms by assigned sex at birth. The bill then immunizes those businesses from discrimination claims: "Adoption or enforcement of a policy pursuant to this section shall not be deemed discrimination under RSA 354-A or any other state law," it reads."
"The bills are part of a larger movement towards bathroom bans for transgender people. Just last month, Kansas passed a bathroom ban that allows every citizen in the state to become a bounty hunter, where reporting transgender people in bathrooms can net them $1,000 per trans person caught. This law also invalidated trans people's drivers licenses in the state. Meanwhile, Idaho and Missouri are both advancing extreme anti-trans bathroom bans of their own, with Idaho's ban even applying to private businesses, making it against the law for a private business to allow a trans person to use the bathroom that matches their gender identity."
I am so TIRED of seeing responses to gender affirming care bans mention cis people.
I dont care how many parts of cis health care could be categorized as gender affirming care.
People need to stop trying to prove our humanity by comparing us to cis people.
They need to stop acting like these bans will affect cis people.
"Sex rejecting proceedures", thats how these bans are being written. They ARE NOT using "gender affirming care" or anything similar.
They are EXPLICITLY targeting trans people.
We deserve gender affirming care, because we are people, and every person deserves health care, and gender affirming care is health care. Period. Full stop.
I also want to mention how pointing to passing trans men as a "gotcha" in response to bathroom bans is also bullshit. "Do you want him in the restroom with your wife/daughter?"
Its disingenuous, because they dont want us in public. period. They actually dont want any of us to use ANY public restrooms.
But I PROMISE you, the people most a risk of being confronted while using public restrooms are not people who pass (notice how i said "most at risk" please dont act like im erasing the risk for passing people).
Its gender non-conforming people, including cis people, who do not fit the narrow ideal these people have of "woman" or "man".
They do not have any idea how to enforce these bathroom bans, they are saying its open season for anyone who doesnt fit in.
I am absolutely sure I could have worded this better, and maybe there is nuance or something i am missing.
Im just so tired of being compared to "acceptable" demographics to prove that I deserve health care and the right to piss in peace.
A man threatened her in the bathroom—but she was the one who got fired.
Dani Davis, a Walmart employee, says she was fired from her job of seven years after a harrowing encounter in the women’s restroom during a shift. Davis says a man entered the bathroom and yelled slurs, apparently mistaking her for a trans woman based solely on her height. She reported the incident to her immediate supervisor but was fired less than a week later, with Walmart citing a “security risk.”
This is the environment TERFs and transphobes and conservatives (but I repeat myself) have created: any woman can be subjected to fear and harassment for even the slightest perceived deficit of femininity and cowardly corporations will do nothing to protect the safety of their own employees. In fact, they'll just make the problem employee - the victim - disappear, just to be safe.
Allegedly, Walmart is now scrambling to rehire Ms. Davis since the story has gone viral and they're now facing down a slew of negative press and (I suspect) are fearful of a lawsuit.
The number surpasses the number of bills filed in advance of 2024, a historically hostile year towards trans individuals.
After a record-breaking year for anti-trans legislation, 2025 is shaping up to be even more challenging for transgender and queer people across the United States. A legislative tracker maintained by Erin In The Morning and other volunteers has found that nearly 120 anti-trans and anti-LGBTQ+ bills have already been filed in states nationwide ahead of the 2025 legislative season. This far surpasses the 80 bills filed by this time in 2023, signaling another historic wave of legal attacks on the ability of transgender people to move, live, and exist freely as themselves in public.
The bulk of the bills so far come from Texas and Missouri, two of the earlier states that release prefilled legislation ahead of the 2025 session. However, states like South Carolina, New Hampshire, Georgia, Wyoming, and Montana all feature multiple anti-LGBTQ+ bills, with more being added every day. Thirteen states in all have seen anti-trans bills filed: Alabama, Arizona, Georgia, Indiana, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, Ohio, South Carolina, Texas, Washington, and Wyoming.
This year, several state bills aim to strip legal recognition from transgender people entirely. Between 2022 and 2024, ten states passed such legislation or enacted similar policies, with devastating consequences for affected communities. In Kansas, Florida, and Texas, transgender individuals are now unable to update their driver’s licenses, and in some cases, states have begun reverting gender marker changes that were made years or even decades ago. Transgender people who have lived as their legal gender for years may face forced reversion of their identification documents if these new bills are enacted. Similar legislation has already been introduced in Texas, Missouri, South Carolina, and Wyoming.
In many states that have passed such legislation, bathroom bans have also been attached. Indeed, in the initial rush of bills, several bathroom bans can be found that target transgender adults. Two Texas bills would allow lawsuits if transgender people are encountered in bathrooms. One bill in Montana would bar transgender people from publicly owned bathrooms of their gender identity. One bill in Missouri would even make it “unlawful public discrimination” to allow a transgender person in bathrooms of their gender identity.
Book bans are seeing a resurgence in the prefiled bills. In 2024, PEN America found 10,046 instances of individual books banned, affecting 4,231 unique titles. Banned books include The Handmaids Tale, Flamer, The Perks of Being a Wallflower, Gender Queer, and more. Texas features several such bills this year, despite the state being rebuked by higher courts for book bans in 2024.
Another common type of anti-trans legislation that is common is sports bans. Many bills aim to expand existing restrictions to even broader contexts. In Texas, one proposed bill seeks to deny private sporting events access to the state’s Events Trust Fund—a source of professional funding for major sporting events—if they allow trans athletes to compete. Other bills aim to extend sports bans to new age groups. For instance, a bill in Wyoming would expand its current ban, which applies to students in grade 7 and above, to include kindergarteners.
Several other categories of bills have seen activity, such as drag bans, forced outing of transgender students, “don’t say gay” bills, birth certificate gender change bans, drivers license gender change bans, and more.
According to the ACLU, legislative attacks on transgender people grew “exponentially” over 2023 and 2024. These anti-trans laws have directly caused an increase in suicide attempts in some states by up to 72%. According to the Centers for Disease Control, one in four transgender youth have attempted to take their own life in the last year, with many of those attempts requiring medical treatment.
In the coming months, a landmark Supreme Court decision will determine the constitutional fate of bills targeting transgender people. While the case centers on a law restricting transgender medical care, its broader implications go far deeper—addressing whether discrimination against transgender people qualifies as sex discrimination warranting heightened scrutiny. The Court may also weigh whether transgender individuals are granted equal protection around their transgender status. This ruling has the potential to either shut the door on many of these bills and laws or swing it wide open, unleashing a flood of legislative attacks that could make 2025 a historically devastating year for transgender rights.
These bills will continue to be tracked by Erin In The Morning and other volunteers and can be found here.
