Something pointed out in the previous post we made was that since endos avoid syscourse or at the very least the syscourse tag, some pro endos feel the need to fight for them. That is... kind of worrying actually. Let's break down why quickly.
So if the vast majority of syscourse arguments are between pro endo traumagenics and anti endo traumagenics, how can we actually know that the topics being debated accurately represent the current state of the endogenic community or the opinions of the endogenic community? Obviously there is some endogenics in the scene, a large amount of mixed origin systems, and we can generally assume pro endos are interacting with endos, but it does add a bit of a distortion, from our perspective.
There are likely some differences in thoughts and behaviors between an actual endogenic system and a pro endo ally. If only the thoughts of the allies are publicly seen, that might make it harder to tell the actual wants and needs of the endogenic community, and also the potential problems and flaws with the endogenic community, in comparison to the pro endogenic community. We think that should be something that's taken into consideration in some of these conversations especially some of the more recent ones.
Sometimes it can be easy to forget that the endogenic community, and the plural community, aren't necessarily the same things. There could even be an argument made on whether or not they should be the same thing, but let's save that mess for another day.












