#characters dynamics

[miki-langelo]

big fan of when the characters pour out and puke out their emotions in the floor in a way that feels so raw and unfiltered. It's an uninterrupted flow of regrets, dreams, desires, frustrations, and dread.

It's so painfully real that you'll know it's almost metaphorical.

[inthemoodforblastt]

Would the marauders have left snape alone of Lily didn't exist? Or gone easy over him?

I think they would have annoyed him the way they annoyed many other students because that’s how they were as bullies, but he probably wouldn’t have been their main target, nor would the bullying have been so relentless, because it’s a canon fact stated by Rowling that if James hated Severus so much, it was because of his relationship with Lily. Without Lily involved, I suppose they might have played some nasty tricks on him from time to time, but nothing they wouldn’t have done to others, in other words, he probably wouldn’t have been their “special case,” in my opinion.

[maxdibert]

In your opinion, why was Dumbledore so blind when it came to the maradeurs and how they treated Severus? I mean, come on, there's no way he didn't know. So why did he not do anything to stop it? Did he see Severus the same way he saw Tom Riddle - as a potential threat before he did anything wrong? I really can't find a good explanation. Everyone sees Dumbledore as a wonderful person and headmaster, so how come he often overlooks when his students are being mistreated?

There’s a disturbing pattern where Dumbledore identifies certain children—particularly Slytherin, particularly poor, particularly isolated—as potential threats. But instead of giving them guidance, support, or protection, he watches them. He tests them. He puts them into situations to see how they’ll react. And when they make the “wrong” choices (usually because they’re trapped), he deems them lost causes.

Dumbledore clear he views Slytherin House as the “problem child” of the school. The very fact that he doesn’t bother to cultivate young Slytherins the way he does with Gryffindors or even Ravenclaws speaks volumes. He often only turns to them when he needs something, from Slughorn’s memory to Snape’s complete self-sacrifice.

So, to answer your question directly: Dumbledore didn’t act because he didn’t value Severus the way he valued other students. He saw him more as a potential risk than a child in pain. And that blind spot —whether caused by house prejudice, or his own ethics— is one of the more damning aspects of his character.

[thewritingautisticat]

Characters who are touched starved interacting with characters who are casually touchy make me so absolutely sick /pos

[hawkefaery]

Poppycas, Sera and Nyktos, Poppycaskieran, Cas and Malik and MillieMalik dynamics (Pt 3)

current situation:

.

.

.

current situation:

Casteel in A kingdom of flesh and fire

.

.

gays as umbrella term ofc but cas and kieran are in fact queer so live with it

.

[graspingremlinhands]

Hey, you, yes you👉

Come closer, I have to tell you something...

What if, hey hey keep listening

What if...

I make Death, the ultimate daddy's boy???

Su niño especial y maravillioso??? Su alegría y orgullo????

(Forgive the Spanish, I'm using an online translator)

But seriously, there aren't many parents ocs, and it can be such a cool dynamic to see. Furthermore there're so little example of wholesome father-son relationship dammit!!! I want some!!

[villainsandvictimsalliance]

Helloo~ ^^

Okay so, favourite troupe in a shounen manga/anime? I have one that's my total fav - redeemed villain who's now part of the main group🥰 (example: Piccolo & Vegeta from Dragon Ball) - and besides the cool fights, this is the other reason why I absolutely adore shounen series! ❤️

That is also one of my favorite tropes 🥺 I love when the shounen stipulates that the villain isn't fully redeemed and they're still very capable of doing questionable things, because that really shows that it's not like the villain is magically cured, but there's some level of understanding between the villain and the heroes side.

And I definitely love the trope in which characters with questionable moral (can be villains, ex-villains or former antagonist) start teaching or protecting little kids or younger characters. I adore to see how both the kids and the adults learn from each other, their mutual understanding and respect, the way the characters with questionable moral decide they're only soft with the kids or the way the kids become powerful enough to protect the morally questionable characters.

The pure nature of the kids along with the lack of judgment they provide sometimes help the gray characters find a reason to grow and overcome themselves. Also, the kids can learn from an early age that everything is not black and white, that they don't have to hate everything or love everything, that just because something looks a certain way it doesn't mean the looks match the content.

There are some examples of this is Dragon Ball (Gohan and Piccolo), on Naruto (Zabuza and Haku), on Katekyo Hitman Reborn! (most of the mentors of the Vongola Family) and there are some on Boku No Hero Academia as well (Kurogiri and Tomura, Twice and Toga), etc.

It's a really cool trope because it has my favorite things in the world: complex characters, kids, friendship or platonic love, lack of sexual interactions and found family, among others.