Hey this somewhat of just kind of a vibe read, so if you feel otherwise it's no big deal; but this post you reblogged earlier feels to me like it wasn't made in good faith https://www.tumblr.com/oldmanontumbler/783939517587587072?source=share
Like it feels like it's getting into "trans men aren't oppressed" territory (at least to me)
This post:
Isn't saying that trans men aren't oppressed! It's just explaining structural privilege.
Men hold more power than women under the patriarchy. But both men AND women hold more power over anyone that society decides to "unperson" or delegate to a "third sex."
The "third sex" is always gonna be trans women. Going from female to male is considered bad, but going from male to female is considered unthinkable. Like, it's a well-known fact that trans women and transfems face discrimination for the act of being trans women, in addition for being trans and for being women.
The "t-word" category is that third sex, that does not affect trans men/transmascs. It's predatory "man in a dress" characters and punchlines, it's "trap" and "sh*male" pornography, where the sensation of a woman having a penis is supposed to be both grotesque and titillating, it's the fact that trans women are denied resources, kicked out of communities, and murdered much, much, much moreso than their transmasculine peers.
--
I think it would be helpful if the general view of the t-word was reframed. A lot of people see it as just a "slur for trans people," as "fag" is for gay ones, and thus you get a slew of trans men referring to themselves as "tr*nnies."
The reality, insofar as I understand it, is different.
If you want to punish a man, you degrade him to womanhood. Structurally, women are positioned below men, and men work hard to keep it that way.
If you have a trans man, you can hurt him by keeping him, socially, at the "woman" level, misgendering him and denying him the privilege men, as a class, afford one another.
But what about trans women? If society wants to punish a trans woman, well, they can't punish her by treating her like a woman, because that is what she wants (not the oppression, of course, but the recognition of her gender), and they can't punish her by treating her like a man, because that would mean affording her men's privilege when she herself has committed the "crime" of rejecting manhood.
So what is done instead?
Instead, trans women are socially punished by being treated as a class below women. That's what the t-word describes in the diagram, as far as I understand.
Neither I, nor the person who made this chart (who I will accredit once off mobile), nor anyone who reblogged this post is saying that trans men aren't oppressed. Unfortunately, we very much are! The thing is, though, trans men are oppressed for being trans. Trans women are oppressed for being trans, for being women, and for being trans women specifically. The worst-case scenario for a trans man is the best-case one for a trans woman. That is all that the post is demonstrating.
⚠️ If I said anything incorrect, please let me know and I will amend it. ⚠️












