I was reading your post on the Jedi recruitment of infants and the ethical dubiousness of the entire system. Do you think the fact not one Jedi protested over the factory slavery of the clones because of how similar it was to their own upbringing?
Short answer: Yes, sort of.
Longer answer: I definitely think that the fact that they were raised in much the same way as the clones made them predisposed not to argue. Plus having an enemy army breathing down your neck can make many otherwise idealist and liberal people very pragmatic, very sudden.
That said, though we never see it in any of the movies unfortunately, but in the old Extended Universe many Jedi objected to the use of the clone army. (This is one of the many things I wished he had spend even a little time on, though considering that he cut what was the beginning of the Rebellion movement subplot from Revenge of the Sith because he considered it unimportant I am not surprised.) And as the war wore on, more and more objected. Some to the point that they left the Order - permanently or temporarily - others opted for trying to improve the system from inside, change the conditions for the troops or try to keep as many of them alive through the war as they could.
Nor was the clones universally happy or compliant with their fate. Some merely grumbled in the ranks, others went awol. Some even went so far to fight for the Separatists.
You see, conditioning and indoctrination will only take things so far. Humans - and I would argue any organic being - isn’t a driod, we’re not programmable. (Yeah, General Hux need to learn a thing or two about how humans work.)
While humans are always, qua our genetics, inclined to agree with the group that we feel that we belong to - and it is extremely stressful for a human to even question group consensus, much less act against it - this does not render us mindless automatons. Indoctrination and conditioning is essentially the “normal” socialisation that all humans go through in our lives and that makes us capable of operating in society, taken to an extreme degree and this does not remove people’s intelligence, or ability to act.
What it does do is to make a person predisposed to think and act in certain ways. A Jedi would be more inclined to agree with the edicts of the Jedi Order, detach emotionally and obey the Council’s orders. A clone trooper would be predisposed to obey their Jedi generals and serve the Republic loyally. And so on.
So yes the Jedi, the ones that didn’t object outright and whom we unfortunately never saw in the movie, would definitely be more inclined to not question the whole mess with the clone army because it was so similar to their own lives. But also because the Council and the Senate - two entities that they have been conditioned their whole lives to respect and obey - okayed it. (The Senate and the Council appears to have been driven by political expediency - and Dark Side manipulations by Palpatine - and desperation respectively.)
I would apologise for the long post, but that would indicate that I was in any way sorry. Social psychology is a pet passion of mine and this is very much a subject that falls under that topic. As a result it irks me no end when people act as if indoctrination and conditioning makes people mindless automaton only capable of obedience, as if people who have been “brainwashed” is only innocent victims, when reality is far more complicated than that.
I hope I didn’t bore you too much.