(My repsonse to your lackey)
I know what you're doing. Thanks for outing yourself as being part of the Epstein machinery. They don't care about the insults to Abrams. He's toast anyway. they care about getting back at people who step on their toes, like when a fan of this particular Star Trek franchise criticizes their other Satanic projects. There was absolutely no reason to go after this Star Trek franchise, today. You did it on orders. As it is you critique is vicious, biased and intentionally misleading.
First off, the original Star Trek was never 'cerebral'. I ought to know, since I watched it. Oh, they certainly through some Shakespeare in here and there, and had lots of lovely, deep moments. But most often, they had Sight gags, jokes, and over-acted zaniness. There's a reason it was shown in the morning, to KIDS.
Second, there was lots of deeper narratives in Star Trek: Into Darkness. Khan was a mirror to Kirk and the actions he took as Captain. He was also a a mirror to Spock, in more ways then one, as being supreme beings going head to head physically and mentally"
Spock from Star Trek and Sherlock Holmes are connected through extreme logic, a shared iconic deductive phrase, and a meta-narrative link suggesting familial ancestry. Spock references Holmes as an ancestor in Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country, highlighting their shared commitment to logic and deduction, while also sharing a "mentally detached" persona that treats emotions as extraneous."
Any REAL fan would know of the fan links between the original Star Trek, and Spock naming Sherlock Holmes as his ancestor. Who better to the play that role, then the actor who was famous for his modern day version of Sherlock? Not exactly brainless, quite well thought out, even for Abrams, and a delight for fans. You know, you're not very good at this. Better luck next time.
