Idk who needs to hear this but you cannot be ableist towards endogenics based on the idea that they are endogenic because that is inherently an oxymoron.
If endos are not disordered then they cannot be discriminated against based on having that disorder because they themselves have said they don’t have that disorder.
“Fakeclaimers and ableists feed off that rhetoric” bro I’m not saying it’s right that fakeclaimers use “endo behaviour” to investigate traumagenic validity but I’m not deleting my account because an endo dick rider went “oh great another anti endo against fakeclaiming and ableism”.
Dude I know fakeclaimers use endos not existing as a reason to fakeclaim (see: my #endoterrogation tag explanation in my pinned post) but if you freaks weren’t so fucking insistent on being in CDD spaces and claiming CDD experiences and being a weird invasive species then we wouldn’t have people using “behaves like an endo” as a reason to fakeclaim. I saw a post earlier, I’ll link it here if I find it that basically said the same thing.
Yes. I’m against fakeclaiming and ableism. Did you know endogenics and their dick riders are ableists too? My blog is specifically about fakeclaiming , I’m anti endo because you cannot be endogenic and be a system. It’s scientifically impossible.
Oh! And because one of your posts says I can’t scientifically back it up I really can.
Please see any entry regarding DID (and subsequently OSDD-1) in: the DSM-V , the IDC-11 , the NHS criterion page for dissociative identity disorder , the Cleveland clinic criterion page for dissociative identity disorder and LITERALLY ANY OTHER SCIENTIFICALLY BACKED AND PEER REVIEWED ARTICLE ON DISSOCIATIVE IDENTITY DISORDER.
Also I think everyone should read this post by a system in science I think it would really get your heads out your arses.
Go touch grass and gain some knowledge outside an echochamber of carrd links , biased google docs and hypothetical blog posts.
Not posting the comment because I do not care to.