So SACSCOC is for BJU what NCAA can be for BJU.
What did the faculty think about all this?
seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from Singapore
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Yemen

seen from France

seen from France
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from France

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from China

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from United States
So SACSCOC is for BJU what NCAA can be for BJU.
What did the faculty think about all this?
And most worrisome to the BJU employees is the clear abandonment of BJU’s sine qua non, Separation. Ring responds:
In reality, we frequently enter into non-spiritual engagement with unbelievers who view life from a different worldview in many areas. The most obvious example is our recent affiliation with SACSCOC. The majority of SACSCOC members promote lifestyles and worldviews in direct conflict with ours. As we interact with these peers, our institutional mission and biblical worldview afford us the opportunity to show forth the light of the Gospel. Our athletic mission, in support of the University mission, affords us the same opportunity through the platform of sports.
So BJU sees SACSCOC and NCAA as parallel.
There’s one huge difference, however. NCAA has money. SACSCOC barely squeaks by.
And there’s the schedule.
Application by 1/15/18--highly likely we will be accepted
Exploratory Year, 9/1/18--much like regional accreditation for the athletic department only
Provisional Years, 9/1/19–22--brand use of NCAA is permissible
Member NCAA DIII, 9/1/23--latest possible date-full membership
So Bob Jones University has already applied. Next up is the Exploratory Year in 2018-19.
Ring explained further:
Practically speaking, there is no post-season opportunity in NCAA DIII until you are a fully vested NCAA institution. It would be hard to recruit students to come if we were only NCAA—they wouldn’t have any post-season play until we become NCAA. We can potentially have an entire graduating class that never played in post-season.
That’s a direct quotation. I think there’s a mistake.
What does BJU mean by “ministry”? It uses the term synonymously with “branding.” But here’s another clearer definition from Ring:
Why stay in DII NCCAA? We can use sports for ministry; BJU has moved into several leadership opportunities and is impacting the organization, and they are happy to have us there. We want to continue having that positive voice in this Christian association.
It’s power. They are in “leadership positions” in the NCCAA. That’s not ministry. It’s power.
BJU does plan to stay in their current DII NCCAA. Why?
Ministry! If there’s ever an iffy reason for doing anything, BJU plasters the ambiguous “ministry” as the motivation. The Museum & Gallery is a ministry. The School of Health Professions is a ministry. Chuck Phelps teaches in the Ministry classes at BJU. Carl Herbster is an example of ministry. The BJU Bruins at NASCAR is a ministry too!
That’s how BJU sees DII NCCAA.
So BJU knows its enrollment is bad. They know their reputation is bad. What else is bad?
Alumni donations.
And they think NCAA membership will fix that because:
People understand a very simple message that we’re NCAA, and they give to that more.”
Honestly, Alumni, will NCAA change how much you give to BJU?
in spite of all the potential hiccups with LGBTQ diversity, Sunday Play, and “discipleship” limitations, BJU is committed to joining the NCAA.
Why?
The same reason it wants a School of Health Professions. The same reason it wanted to get SACSCOC accreditation.
To elevate its reputation. To give themselves an air of legitimacy.
BJU knows that their reputation is bad. Will NCAA and SACSCOC fix it?