Regulation in small G proteins is concerned with controlling when Ras superfamily members should be charged with GTP or GDP. Small guanine nucleotide-binding proteins act as molecular switches and are able to recruit downstream effectors only when bound to GTP. Thus correct binding of GTP or GDP is crucial for the correct cellular function in timely, co-ordinated, and appropriate response to stimuli because G proteins have slow intrinsic GDP/GTP exchange and GTPase rates. Thus they need to be regulated by guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) for equipping small G proteins with GTP, and by GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs) for removing GTP from small G proteins.
The general scheme for GEF activity involves disruption of the magnesium cofactor or residues in the vicinity of the nucleotide binding pocket. Generally, binding of a GEF to a GDP-bound G protein is a low-affinity interaction, but subsequently becomes high-affinity when the GDP is lost. Binding of GTP causes the GEF to dissociate and all associated contacts to reverse: the so-called "push-and-pull model". GEFs usually contact switches I and II on G proteins - examples of this behaviour are found in RhoGEF's Dbl homology (DH) and pleckstrin homology (PH) domains, and ArfGEF's Sec7 domain. An example where this model is too simplistic are for RabGEFs, which are prevented from acting promiscuously by GDP dissociation inhibitors (GDIs) which remain bound until Rab:GDP returns to its donor membrane, where a GDI displacement factor (GDF) displaces the GDI. Another one is ArfGEF again, which cannot access the nucleotide binding site unless Arf is membrane-bound, in which case the N-terminal helical hasp is displaced. ArfGEF interacts with the interswitch, switches I and II, and the N-terminal helix.
The general scheme for GAP activity involves an arginine finger from the GAP that points into the nucleotide binding pocket ready to neutralise the negative charge in the pentavalent transition state. The G protein provides a general base catalyst glutamine to prime and align a water molecule for SN2 attack on GTP's γ phosphate. The pentavalent transition state can be frozen experimentally by using the mimic GDP.AlF4-. Systems in which this model is an oversimplification include the ArfGAP, which requires the Coatomer vesicle coat protein for activity. This requirement ensures the correct order of events in COP I vesicle formation. Also, RabGAPs are structurally diverse and provide both the arginine and glutamine catalytic residues: the so-called "dual-finger mechanism". The glutamine on RabGAP displaces the equivalent, would-be catalytic glutamine on Rab:GTP. RanGAP's activity is hampered by the presence of a C-terminal DEDDDL motif on Ran:GTP and so its activity is enhanced by RanBP1, which sequesters the DEDDDL motif and allows RanGAP to work: the so-called "molecular embrace".
The complexity in regulation in G protein nucleotide-bound state makes sense when you consider their downstream effectors. G proteins often have cascades of targets which have many ultimate goals, including cell growth, cytoskeleton control, vesicle traffic control, and nuclear traffic control. The Rho effectors WASP and WAVE are well-studied proteins which control the actin cytoskeleton in response to activated signal pathways in which Rho is a component.
Cherfils, J.; Zeghouf, M. 2013. "Regulation of small GTPases by GEFs, GAPs, and GDIs." Physiological Reviews 93:269-309.
Takenawa, T.; Miki, H. 2001. "WASP and WAVE family proteins: key molecules for rapid rearrangement of cortical actin filaments and cell movement." Journal of Cell Science 114:1801-1809.
Pasqualato, S.; Renault, L.; Cherfils, J. 2002. "Arf, Arl, Arp and Sar proteins: a family of GTP-binding proteins with a structural device for ‘front–back’ communication." EMBO Reports 3 (11):1035-1041.
Goldberg, J. 1998. "Structural basis for activation of ARF GTPase: mechanisms of guanine nucleotide exchange and GTP–myristoyl switching." Cell 95:237-248.
Goldberg, J. 1999. "Structural and functional analysis of the ARF1–ARFGAP complex reveals a role for coatomer in GTP hydrolysis." Cell 96:893-902.
Rak, A.; Pylypenko, O.; Durek, T.; Watzke, A.; Kushnir, S.; Brunsveld, L.; Waldmann, H.; Goody, R.D.; Alexandrov, K. 2003. "Structure of Rab GDP-dissociation inhibitor in complex with prenylated YPT1 GTPase." Science 302:646-650.
Pan, X.; Eathiraj, S.; Munson, M.; Lambright, D.G. 2006. "TBC-domain GAPs for Rab GTPases accelerate GTP hydrolysis by a dual-finger mechanism." Nature 442:303-306.
Renault, L.; Nassar, N.; Vetter, I.; Becker, J.; Klebe, C.; Roth, M.; Wittinghofer, A. 1998. "The 1.7 Å crystal structure of the regulator of chromosome condensation (RCC1) reveals a seven-bladed propeller." Nature 392:97-101.
Seewald, M.J.; Körner, C.; Wittinghofer, A.; Vetter, I.R. 2002. "RanGAP mediates GTP hydrolysis without an arginine finger." Nature 415:662-666.
Ayraethazide. 2014. “Cell signalling examples.” [Accessed 2015-11-23.]
Ayraethazide. 2015. “Metaphase to Cytokinesis.” [Accessed 2015-11-23.]
Ayraethazide. 2015. “The Secretory Pathway.” [Accessed 2015-11-23.]
Ayraethazide. 2014. “The Ran Cycle.” [Accessed 2015-11-23.]