This might be a bit of a hot take and is gonna sound weird out of context, but I don't really like how modern writers treat all LGBT+ identities as interchangeably representative of each other, like we're Lego pieces that can be swapped out.
Like, for an example of what I mean, i went to a comic book subreddit asking for superhero stories that were explicitly led by lesbians specifically, and more than half of them failed to live up to that standard at all. Practically every comment had a reply correcting them that one of the characters they recommended were bisexual. Which normally would be great, i like canonically queer characters of any identity, but as a lesbian I was looking for characters that I could see my specific identity represented within.
Just because a story has good bi representation does not necessarily mean it is going to have good lesbian representation. Just because it has good lesbian trans representation doesn't mean it will have good trans representation. Having good trans representation doesn't mean it will have good bisexual representation.
The L Word was a massive win for representation of cis lesbian women, but up until Gen Q it was horrifically transphobic in its handling of trans men and it still doesn't have an explicitly trans woman main character.
The romanceable cast of games like Dragon Age: Veilguard, Baldurs Gate 3, or Stardew Valley are all explicitly canonically bi/pan by default (since all potential romantic options are romanceable by the player character regardless of gender, barring the very rare exception), but if you want to see yourself in the game as a gay person you're limited entirely to just headcanoning your specific incarnation of the player character, unable to have your character ever explicitly voice their identity in any meaningful capacity. Same thing with Assassin's Creeds both Valhalla and Odyssey.
RWBY has a relationship between a bi woman (Blake) and a woman who is broadly generally known to be Sapphic but who's explicit canon sexuality is up for debate (Yang), and when you look at the explicitly undeniably canon lesbians we get...Ilia? A woman that only gets to be an actual character for a volume before getting written out entirely alongside Sun and Neptune. Maybe Jaune's moms, but they're more plot device than characters. Gay men get the Bury Your Gays in Clover and offensive stereotyping in Scarlett. Trans women get May Marigold the glorified background extra (who's VA was on the receiving end of horrific transmisogynistic abuse from fans and staff alike).
Side note: I hate the "Unlabeled Broadly Sapphic" type of rep for precisely this reason. Well, that, and the fact that any attempt at interpreting the supposedly unlabeled characters as anything other than bi/pan is loudly shouted down as Bi/Pan Erasure (which BTW, calling this out as Bi/Pan Erasure detracts from actual instances of Bi/Pan Erasure). I mean, we all saw the collective shit fit Comic Twitter threw when G. Willow Wilson called Poison Ivy a lesbian, right?
