(after, he spends a lot of time apologising for his anger, and they spend a lot of time telling him he has the right to feeling it, to being it.)
in the books, nathan is very, very angry. it’s near constant: he is angry whilst awake, his body trembles with rage in his sleep, he is burdened constantly by the weight of his own anger-fear-hatred.
in the show, he is angry only when it can be justified by the viewer: the massacre of the ozanne, his torture at ce(e)lia’s hands, soul (full stop).
there’s probably a middle ground somewhere between the two. what do we lose in making nathan palatable, in softening him. is this some kind of justification? he doesn’t deserve it because he is kind, because he isn’t his father (who is also noticeably less irritable within the show)? because, saliently, he is not the ‘angry black boy’?
i do love him more in the show, however, and i do like that he is allowed many more moments of peace, and that he is slightly less brutalised.














