I've been saying this for over twenty years.
In this installment of Azure's Corner, let's revisit "No Kings."
This movement message is funded entirely by China. It's backed by an American defector, a megaglomerate CEO who now lives in China. He's supported the PRC and is behind many of the organizations that you probably support, if you're a Democrat voter. One of the most prominent is one his wife created: Code Pink.
Backing and operating over five hundred organizations across the United States, he and George Soros, have been behind the vast majority of the campaigns that wind up in the news. From Anti-ICE and "No Kings" to Antifa and even BLM; these two individuals and their families are responsible for the past twenty years of violence and narrative warfare in the United States.
What is the difference?
George Soros has a fiscal-first and philosophical-second approach to achieving two goals. His first goal is making money. His second goal is the implementation of his manifest destiny for his family as geopolitical rulers -- a monarchy with his family centric to the global fiefdom. His vision is vastly shaped by hard-left nationalism founded by the Nazi party in World War II. While neither Marxist nor Stalinist by nature, his views are inherently shaped by Adolf Hitler's Mein Kompf. Having been an early teen during Germany's occupation of his native Hungary (which he's been banned from ever returning lest he face prosecution) during the late period of the war, he was of the age to be required to join the Hitler Youth -- which inherently ties into possibly how his family was turned in and murdered, yet he somehow miraculously was spared.
However, Neville Roy Singham is the husband of Jodie Evans (Code Pink). You'll find out more about him from this link:
Neville Roy Singham Biography: Neville Roy Singham, a successful American entrepreneur and former chairman of the renowned IT consulting fir
His political activism support China's viewpoints and so does Code Pink. In fact, the whole "No Kings" movement is the Chinese political propaganda arm by proxy. These are not "grassroots" but rather "astroturfing" protests supported by people who are not intellectually aware and are not critically thinking about the situation they're purported to support. In many cases, they're paid to just show up and as we've seen by reporters interviews of them, they don't know what they're talking about. Oftentimes, "Orange man bad".
Yet we see in the elected Democrats a common voice stating exactly the same lines that both George and Neville both espouse themselves. More importantly, we see veiled threats by these elected Democrats using calls to violence using words like "revolution" and "fight back" that are crossing the line between "just words" and insurrectionism. Elizabeth Warren recently went on her own X account and on live television to call for Americans to "fight back" at the United States.
No Kings.
This first needs to establish that the United States is a Representative Democracy. This specifically means that the President of the United States in effect is CEO of the country. This also needs to establish that a monarchy the United States is not, because the President is not a King due to it being an elected position that lasts between one or two four-year terms whereas a monarchy is a familial line of succession.
So these people who are protesting for "No Kings" have no logical argument to stand on, because the President cannot become hereditary by nature of the Constitution alone. Furthermore, it's a misnomer to indicate that the President is acting as a King, because the President has the power of the Executive Branch and the distribution of authority between the other two branches of Legislative and Judicial are in fact the "King" of the United States. No single branch has authority over the other two and the three as a trinary operate as the ruling monarchy -- each with their own decisive groups with equal power. Therefore, what "No Kings" is protesting does not exist, unless their argument is that the United States Constitution be abolished: Which it is.
The underlying reason why these people are protesting is because China wants the United States weakened on the geopolitical stage. Meanwhile, Soros is seeking to undermine the United States to subvert the national interest into leaning Socialist. China being Communist is the antithesis of what Soros intends, but is a means to an ends whereby his control over the world is solidified by lawmakers who are his personal vassals. Playing the long game, Soros himself may never live to become the Fuhrer of Earth, but his son might. By his support of far-left ideals and propping up future legislators rising up from Attorneys to heads of state (EU as an example; see Starmer, France, Spain, and even Germany until recently), the goal is to align heads of state to turn over their country's sovereignty to a national body that may instill a member of his family as leader. A national body whose charter presently has no governing authority lest it be ratified such by member nations... like the United Nations.
The only reason this hasn't happened yet, is because of the United States -- the country that founded the UN in the first place. In fact, it was Europe who made it absolutely clear that the UN would hold no legitimate power over any nation. This is the reason the UN is a barking dog with no teeth. Yet, his attempts to weak the United States on the world stage have been foiled by one man: President Donald Trump, who has been following US precedent whereas his predecessors, inclusive of the Bush family, had not. What's furthermore interesting is that President Trump has been following the law, utilizing past Presidential precedents, and siding very hard on the Constitution; yet the Democrats who claim otherwise have been found flouting all of that, and more, with many of them over present to past being indicted many times for all levels of criminality.
That's why the Democrats chant, "Orange Man Bad, Umgawa!"
Meanwhile, the establishment of the "Board of Peace" is a replacement of the United Nations. It has teeth. The charter grants membership states to the right of sovereignty and equal representation on all decisions made that affect the world. It in effect has the power of the United States Constitution behind it, with parallels providing the same protections to those member states. The "Board of Peace" does establish the same representations for lawmaking that balance the equation for their populaces' future whereas the United Nations does not.
This is the existential threat to Communism, specifically China -- the last true bastion of Communism in the entire world. While there are Socialist states, it's important to exclude Russia. Russia is no longer socialist nor is it Communist. It's easy to mistake Putin's interests as re-establishing the Soviet Union -- which he despises despite having worked for them as a KGB operative. Putin specifically wants to become an Emperor of the Russian Empire. Over the past five to ten years, he's been using the term "Russian Empire" instead of "Russian Federation" to establish that in the minds of the populace. However, his challenge is that the people of Russia don't support that but are generationally subservient to the State due to past Communist rule and only a fleeting experience with true democracy until Putin took power.
Such is why China is so fervent in increasing the pressure internally on the United States with the assistance of these two, Soros and Singham, as useful idiots. Singham has the knowhow of pushing ideology through propaganda due to his awareness of viral information (not to be mistaken as "viral posts") and Soros for his philosophical alignment along his interests of avarice.
Game time.
Should China achieve its goal and destabilize the United States into a civil war, China would pursue military support for the side supporting them: Democrats. Should that civil war end in favor of China's goals, they would gain foothold on US soil and the United States would become a territory of the PRC. Furthermore, Soros and Singham would then be able to install the UN with teeth through all other nations under their control. With support for the Soros family to achieve this, China would likely off both of them and attain rule over the planet.
Sounds far fetched, right? Then you probably haven't heard of the "Silk Road Initiative."
[Note: The commentary about sea-level rise is defunct, following recent revelation that the Climate Science Community was using extremely bad and falsified data.]
However, the United States is standing directly in front of this imitative. Europe has already begun to see what China is really up to as a result of the Iranian incursion by the United States. Furthermore, the US capture of Maduro completely uprooted China's influence in Venezuela. The blockade on Cuba isn't about Russia or even Communism! It's about China having been building military facilities on Cuban soil. This is why Cuban leadership isn't doing more than barely a touch of saber rattling, because they know they're in deep debt to China.
Let's evaluate that last bit, shall we?
[Note: This video is made by the PRC on a PRC owned Youtube Channel.]
If this is the case, and it's operational, why is Cuba now experiencing blackouts? It's not due to bad infrastructure, because China replaced it. So would that mean Chinese technology is bad? Well, perhaps, but it is highly unlikely. The reality is that Cuba can't pay back China, and so the Chinese were going to foreclose on this infrastructure to take it over for decades. When Cuba pushed back, the blackouts began -- not because of their solar power initiative, but because the power plant failed spectacularly (likely due to Chinese sabotage to reinforce their "agreement" with Cuba and as an example to the leadership).
So where does the blockade come in? It comes in because China was sending ships with troops and military equipment to install on Cuban land. Echoes of the past, am I right? Cuba had sent military officers to Venezuela at the behest of China, who was sent their own diplomats to solidify Venezuela's military by establishing Chinese military bases there too. Fortunately, those Chinese officers witnessed exactly what the US can do, and the United States ended that real quick. This presented Maduro's VP with all the power she needed to cut ties with China before it was too late -- that's why she's our pal now. It's not fear of the US, it's fear of China after she was likely presented with information after the fact.
And why isn't Cuba up in arms about the blockade? Because they see the writing on the wall. They have a military and people entrenched in Communism and a monarchy to maintain. Yes, Cuba is a monarchy as Castro will likely pass the torch to his son and if the "No Kings" movement were true, they'd be protesting Cuba's leadership inasmuch as Putin's leadership. Therefore, as they aren't, then their voices are by default null and void. Their ideology has no intellectual support beneath it as a result of this logical fallacy.
Cuba secretly is asking for help from the United States.
Nuclear ambitions
Why is the United States building nuclear arms? It's not to combat Russia. Russia's stockpile is antiquated and their attempts to refurbish their nuclear capacity has been met with tragedies.
This wasn't the only explosion... Another occurred at a port where they were building their "so called" nuclear torpedo.
So if it isn't about Russia, then it must be about Iran, right? Nope. It's about China. China has the world's third-largest and second-newest nuclear weapons stockpile. They began expanding that stockpile and further expanding their reach into the Pacific to establish forward missile bases for these nukes. Yet, you don't hear about anti-nuclear protesters against China or Iran, do you? And if Iran was building them, China was assisting them to add another player to the field that they could control.
This brings us full circle.
Iran, Cuba, Venezuela, the South Pacific: These are all Chinese initiatives to encroach strategically to militarily expand their power against the United States and Australia. China already has Europe by the short and curlies, thanks to Italy, Turkey, Germany by proxy of Russia, and Spain. Seen in the Silk Road Initiative, China's power influence already includes South East Asia all the way to Sri Lanka and the middle east. OPEC nations are now aligning with the United States because they have had a series of failed Chinese partnerships that resulted in further gains for China and bad investments for the middle east.
The Sheiks aren't stupid. They were misled and lied to by China. One thing these middle eastern countries uphold higher than the Koran is respect. They feel disrespected by China and they will remember that for generations. So why turn to the US? Because the US prizes honesty higher than respect. In the past, the United States had been perceived as disrespecting the Middle East, but it was later understood by the Sheiks that it was their misinterpretation of US culture.
The Middle East has a mix of Religion within their Governance. This mix shifts left and right like US political views. Some are too religious, like Iran, and others are less religious like Qatar. They're always trying to strike a balance with the world that they find eyeing them with concern and eagerness over their resource of oil. Iran has always been their problem child as it had failed to change with the times.
So with their understanding that honesty can mean saying what you mean, whether you denounce the US as villainous or agreeing to terms on paper, or even if those terms obfuscate meaning but are still right there in your face if you ask about them, meant that the US does respect others but also highly promotes responsibility by rightly putting it onto their shoulders. This aligns very well with Middle Eastern philosophies, reinforcing their understanding that the United States isn't to be dismissed as a peer -- Business is business, and as long as they mind their own, then the US minds it's own, and friendship is a separate thing.
All of this matters, if you've cared to read this far. Because China does not respect other nations. It is against the Chinese Communist philosophy and goals to do so. China used to be a very different place prior to Mao Tsung, before Communism. It was a cultural epicenter for the world with a mindset then that was very similar to the United States today. So if we delve into "No Kings", we find China undermining the world for China's goals and ambitions, and the only nation that's gumming up the works is the United States with one of the most powerful, effective, and centrist leaders in the Nation's history.
He's not a King: He's a Citizen.
