#is this syscourse?

[elysianpuppy]

apparently if youre under 15 you cant be plural /sarc

[anti-willo-piko]

this should be an ice cold take but if you are making an app designed for pwcdds (like all the simply plural-esk apps) or endogenics specifically you can state your syscourse stance as much as you want, but you CANNOT control who uses that app. pro endo, anti endo, once that app hits the app store anyone can use it and anyone is gonna use it

[alpha-miku]

Idk if maybe this is a Tumblr/Discord language difference but to me anti endo ≠ sysmed. Not inheritly, at least.

Sysmeds (at least as far as I've understood in my time on Discord) have always been systems that fakeclaim cdd systems for presenting abnormally or not being/not wanting to be diagnosed.

But it seems like here its more often the case that people are of the opinion that sysmed = anti endo.

Has anyone else noticed this difference? Am I just in weird communities with this definition or something?

I've always thought it was strange for blogs like anti-willo-miku to call themselves sysmeds when they don't seem to fit the definition that I'm familiar with, but I think its just that its defined differently here. Realizing that has made it make a lot more sense.

[kiichiouma]

i got put on the RQ blocklist...mama are you proud of me🥹🥹🥹🥹

[ghost-jester-sys]

Being genuine

If someone IS a system but has fallen prey to endogenic misinformation, they deserve so much support.

Because going from believing you have no trauma or that your trauma isn't bad enough to understanding that you do indeed have (bad enough) trauma must be terrifying, (even if you don't remember it)

Personally, I was never under the impression that endogenic systems existed- I had researched DID/OSDD specifically at a young age and more recently had researched other CDDs and CDD systems. I believed I simply had very intense C-PTSD, before coming to understand that I do indeed have DID (and later learn we are polyfragmented).

Note: I am not disclosing any medical information for our safety and will not elaborate on why this is unsafe for us specifically.

That in itself was terrifying to understand, even without being under the spell of misinformation and (in many cases) grooming from endos.

[sophieinwonderland]

(I'm a different anon) I want to add something to "degenerate"; I think it's important to know that "degenerate" isn't only used in the context of antisemitism and nazism. In fact, I have literally never seen it used in that way in my many years on the internet, only in the context of meme and weeb culture where it's usually about liking things that normal people would find repulsive and probably ostracise you for. For example, genuinely enjoying (in THAT way) a certain infamous manga made by "Shindol L" means you're a degenerate. Vtuber Comdost is an example of a degenerate (looking at the thumbnails on her YouTube videos tells you everything).

I'm not saying it can't necessarily be used as a nazi dogwhistle, only that I have never seen it used that way anywhere. Maybe it is used that way on tumblr or in very niche places, I don't know, but unless something has slipped under my radar somehow, you're more likely to see it used elsewhere in the way I have seen it be used.

I also don't know if it has nazi roots, but I doubt anybody is thinking of nazis when using said word. I at least haven't heard of it having such roots until now.

Isn't this normally used in a more silly or ironic way?

I found a Reddit thread on the topic and most people there agreed that it did have those connotations.

I do feel that context matters a lot. Someone who calls themselves a degenerate probably isn't an issue. Neither is someone who teasingly refers to people they're friends with as degenerates. I'd argue that these uses are fine because they're making fun of more harmful uses of the word.

But if you had someone angrily calling other people degenerates, then that might be a red flag.

To me, this is a case where tone and context are incredibly important.

[fagsystem]

(CW: I am not in a headspace where I can truly determine if what I am saying may be unreality or triggering of someone's delusions. You have been warned. Anyone who is able to tell better is free to suggest tags I can warn this with.)

Has any other CDD system had the experience of an alter understanding what CDDs are, introjects are, and the fact that their existence and memories are as a result of the disorder but also are fully convinced they are their source?

I know I'm him. I truly am. I believe that me being reincarnated into a DID system has little to do with the fact that I am him and I would still be him even if I were a singlet. But I also understand that he's fictional, I am not, and that my memories are 'psudomemories'.

Has anyone else had this experience before?

(Critical note: I am going to be speaking to our psychologist. You are free to share your experiences and offer any sort of advice while assured that you aren't going to say something that could potentially cause me problems. I am safe and alright and trust the judgment of the medical professional above yours. I am mostly just searching for anyone with personal experience with this.)