Watching Doctor Who this week (don't worry, Chelsea, I won't provide spoilers) put me face-to-face with some pretty fundamental issues surrounding everyday self-identity, but most especially in the context of some literary medium. Fiction, as it were - or science fiction, really, because that's what this whole thing is about.
Running through all this, I'm really thinking about myself, and the stories that I have written or am writing. Or will write. It's all about tone or mood, about pace, about symbolism and meaning, and also realism. Without connection, a story is just a story; done right, a story is an experience.
Toby Whithouse (I've heard him, appropriately enough, been referred to as the "Joss Whedon of British television") knows how to create a story that is not only exciting and fantastic, but also (sur)real - I mean, A Town Called Mercy was something that had a much more grounded-in-reality feel than Dinosaurs On A Spaceship (which, while utterly brilliant (thank you Chris Chibnall, as usual), was also so fantastical that we really loved it BECAUSE it was blatantly impossible and beyond us. We LOVE that the Doctor can take us on these journeys because we never can.) in that it had the sort of edginess and burden of something we could potentially face in real life. Like Firefly and Serenity, A Town Called Mercy combined the wonder and excitement of fantastic possibility, and grounded it all with a very un-jazzed-up depiction of real people getting by, no unrealistic pomp about it. Well, unless you count the cyborg (part technology, part man - think pacemakers, artificial limbs... we're working on it). Details.
We have a man expected to provide all the answers, to make everything right, to face down every manner of evil and immorality, and all the while keep a collected head and maintain a saintlike dedication to flawless morality. No matter if those around him or against him do murky or sketchy things, even the slightest variation from the path and he's seen as a monster because it contrasts so sharply with the moral prison he's chosen to entomb himself in the rest of the time. And he's chosen to do that because, deep down, he IS a monster - or, at least, was, and no one ever psychologically recovers from that. But talk about pressure, and to still make everything okay, without sacrificing the moral ground, time and time again, for 1200 years (or however long your character, or person, has).
But he doesn't do it because he is morally superior, he does it because it's right, and the people he cares about are there (whether actually or just in spirit, in heart, in mind) to remind him (without their even realizing it) why he wants to do the right thing.
Without love, the lives lived and places visited lose their flavor, it all turns to ash, and eventually the moral ground recedes because doing the right thing incurs just as many losses and failures as doing the wrong, and it's several times more difficult. Being selfish or spiteful, treating others harshly, or choosing NOT to act are all easier paths, all of which will only damage love.
Without love, breathing's just the ticking of.