Theoria: The Essentials of the Semiotic Theory of Magic
Acts of Magic, of whatever kind, are acts of Communication. I addressed this briefly in a private series titled the "Lesser Black Magic Primer" as follows:
A Basic Model of Communication
One of the most useful models of communication was proposed in 1954 by Charles Osgood and Wilbur Schramm.
Communication takes place between Interpreters, with a cyclical exchange. In a single act of communication one of the Interpreters acts as the Encoder. This individual takes some Message and puts it through a code of some sort. The most common in interpersonal communication is through language. The encoded message is then transmitted in some fashion to the other Interpreter who acts as the Decoder. As long as they know the code the Encoder used they can decode it and receive the message intended. Once a cycle like this is complete, it repeats in the other direction, creating a circular feedback system.
You might notice a place where problems can arise. What happens in the Encoding Interpreter used a code which the Decoder does not know? In that situation the Message will not be received at all. what happens if the Decoder only understands part of the code being used? They will delete and distort content from the Message that was encoded, and will likely generalize from what they do understand or have experienced in the past.
This model of communication will be the basic model I will be using throughout the discussion to follow. I will add to it from other Communications Studies resources, but the Osgood-Schramm Model will be the basic I will return to again and again.
Communication Studies is a rather complex field with a curious history, drawing from psychology, philosophy and other intellectual disciplines. It is outside the scope of this series to go into full details, but I encourage you to do your own independent research in this area.
From this model we see that the act of encoding is a central aspect of communication. Indeed, the creation of acts of magic comes from clearly identifying desires, seeing how to define them as intents, and then encoding this intent in a fashion that is resonant with your self of magic. For those fluent in a specific tradition or neo-tradition of magic this process of encoding will often fit within the semiotic structure of that tradition. For the purposes of this series however I am going to assume that you are not already fluent in any given tradition/neo-tradition and thus will need to come to your own means of encoding desires. It is for this reason that I draw from Liber MMM the practice of Sigil Magic.
In terms of existing texts on sigil magic, Frater U.D.'s Practical Sigil Magic is the best primary text with Jan Fries' Visual Magick being a worthwhile secondary text to challenge aspects of Frater U.D.'s thinking and to expand the potential media for practice.
All sigil magic follows a relatively simple formula. Identify a desire and turn it into a declarative statement of intent. These are best formed as positive statements. there is a strong benefit to forming these statements in a manner which J. L Austin termed a "performance utterance" in his seminal How to Do Things With Words. Once the statement has been formed, it is then put through a process of encoding. These encodings can be via nearly any media, however the two most common are visual and auditory, with kinesthetic or gestural methods being less commonly discussed in the literature on sigil magic.
Once the sigil is formed, it is then enchanted through an act of magic. A period of preparation takes place, a time for the act is determined, compression takes place, a frame rite is performed and in this magical space the sigil is charged in some manner appropriate to its communication. Once this is complete the frame ritual is used to close and the intent is let go of by the magician to work.
Much as been made in the literature of sigil magic regarding the importance of forgetting the intent of the sigil. This isn't nearly as necessary as has been suggested. What is important is not to be obsessive about the intent and continually calling it to mind. Much like a farmer you need to trust that once you have planted a well tended and selected seed that it will do the work of germinating on its own, provided they give it the proper soil.
This covers the first direction of communication, at least in terms of the encoder and the sending of the message, but what are we communicating with? As discussed previously, there are tow potential targets for our message: the Inner Ring of Perception to engage in Metamorphosis and the Outer Ring of the Objective to engage in Sorcery.
Ipsissimus Flowers provides a description of acts of magic drawn from the anthropologist Jan van Baal in his dissertation Runes and Magic.
Magic is seen by van Baal as a two sentence affair. The first is the Magician communicating their encoded desire to the other reality (Inner or Outer). The second is the response from that reality through phenomenon providing the result of the original communication.
Ipsissimus Flowers provides an interesting typology for acts of magic that are worth considering when identifying your desires. These categories are:
a) protection from destruction, forces, beings, etc.
b) restoration of disturbed natural order, health, etc.
c) preservation of natural order, health, etc.
d) attraction of desired forces, beings, persons — invocations, evocations, love-magic, etc.
e) destruction of intrusive forces, beings, persons — curses, etc.
f) transformation of forced, beings, persons — initiation, shape-shifting, etc.
g) perception of hidden reality — divination
It is important to note that these need not be isolated or exclusive categories. A blending of them is common, such as attracting people capable of preserving a given project, or looking to create the potential for transformation via the destruction of hindrances. Interestingly different traditions and styles of magic place emphasis upon some of these more than others. Ipsissimus Flowers notes that much of the surviving examples of runic magic deal with protection, restoration and preservation. The magic of Anton LaVey in contrast deals almost exclusively with attraction, destruction, and restoration. You will likely find in practice that you rely more heavily upon some of these categories than others. this will provide you with both a sense of your strengths and those areas where you are weakest.