Discover Top Posts Tagged with #kane lives

Azure's Corner

It's time to unfuck this mess, because people are being treated as if they're stupid by the media that is spoon-feeding them lies.

From: https://wgntv.com/news/politics/donald-trump-has-sweeping-plans-what-hes-proposed/

My comments are in red, the quoted news article is in blue.

A look at what Trump has proposed:

Immigration

“Build the wall!” from his 2016 campaign has become creating “the largest mass deportation program in history.” Trump has called for using the National Guard and empowering domestic police forces in the effort.

He called for using the National Guard, which is operated by the States and not the Federal Government, to secure the border as there are not enough ICE officers to do so. The domestic police forces already have authority to enforce United States laws. His call to empower them means to strip cities of their "sanctuary" status that allows them to ignore Federal law and violate the 14th Amendment.

Still, Trump has been scant on details of what the program would look like and how he would ensure that it targeted only people in the U.S. illegally. He’s pitched “ideological screening” for would-be entrants ...

Everyone entering the United States legally are given an ideological screening as part of their immigration processing. It was enacted a long, long time ago to entrap spies and saboteurs in the 30s, later it remained enacted post-70s to entrap terrorists. It's not a pitch, because the Biden Administration ended this practice by ignoring Federal law and allowing unrestricted, unmonitored, and unlawful entry into the United States.

..., ending birth-right citizenship (which almost certainly would require a constitutional change) [Won't happen, this is not something he pitched, it was listed in the stupid 2025 document that was released by a retarded thinktank no one listens to anyway. It cannot be enacted because the very birthright citizenship is a hallmark of the United States and is an internationally recognized maritime law.], and said he’d reinstitute first-term policies such as “Remain in Mexico,” limiting migrants on public health grounds and severely limiting or banning entrants from certain majority-Muslim nations. Altogether, the approach would not just crack down on illegal migration, but curtail immigration overall.

This is hyperbolic and misleading. Remain in Mexico existed prior to the Biden Administration. In fact, people were not "caught and released" prior to Biden, they were deported and had to remain in their countries to file for immigration legally -- after a period of six months to a year for violating US immigration law. This is the law that Biden and Kamala ignored. Public health and ill-intended ultra-nationalists were always factors of grounds to limit or ban people entry from any country. In fact, the only way to get into the US from a prohibited nation (like Iran) was asylum. Even then, if you had an incurable and highly infectious disease, you would be prohibited entry. This was the case with leprosy, which is now curable until it isn't. If someone cannot be cured because they're too far gone with the disease, they are still sent to leprosy colonies to avoid infecting the public. It will curtail immigration overall because we'll be enforcing the laws that have existed for nearly a hundred years.

Abortion

Trump played down abortion as a second-term priority, even as he took credit for the Supreme Court ending a woman’s federal right to terminate a pregnancy and returning abortion regulation to state governments. At Trump’s insistence, the GOP platform, for the first time in decades, did not call for a national ban on abortion. Trump maintains that overturning Roe v. Wade is enough on the federal level.

This is where people get mislead very easily. The Government does not give people rights via laws. It takes people's rights via laws. It is best to do so to prevent a patchwork of laws across various states. However, Roe v. Wade was not a Federal law. Repeal of it did not ban abortion. The problem was that abortion proponents were abusing the ruling and attempting to further push for abortions up to and even post birth. Their argument was that at any point, Human life can be extinguished at will of the mother or the state. Meaning, they wanted to codify how and when the Government could step in and order an abortion. Proponents of this only targeted minorities. In effect, Roe v. Wade was now promoting eugenics. The overturning of it returned the rights to the people, or the states where people had voted for laws restricting or defining the use of abortion. Any right not held by the state belong to the people: Removing Roe v. Wade put the right to choose back into the hands of women, taking the their right to choose away from the Government. I know, it's convoluted. I had to sit down and review it with a constitutional attorney friend because I was curious.

Still, Trump has not said explicitly that he would veto national abortion restrictions if they reached his desk. [Why should he? Just to make people feel good about a theoretical situation?] And in an example of how the conservative movement might proceed with or without Trump, anti-abortion activists note that the GOP platform still asserts that a fetus should have due process protections under the 14th Amendment’s equal protection clause. That constitutional argument is a roadmap for conservatives to seek a national abortion ban through federal courts.

The quoted anti-abortion activists being noted here are in the extremist category. They are not indicative of the actual conversations around abortion in general. They are also not in a position to enact this as they are not senators or representatives. In rare instances, such voices coming from senators or representatives are in staunch minority or simply singularity. The 14th Amendment being cited incorrectly in this context. The 14th Amendment requires states to apply Federal laws equally, and thus, supply equal protections for all citizens. This does not apply to non-citizens, which include the unborn as they cannot be citizens until birth on U.S. soil. [See how this comes full circle?] Due process is associated with legal persecution. Those who leverage this are the extremists who believe that the act of abortion is being carried out as a state-enacted death sentence after a criminal trial. This is just fucking stupid for them to believe, so I'm not even going to defend it. However, they would be correct if the state did call for an abortion to occur. Instead of looking at the real issue of murdering an infant and how liberals push abortion instead of education on low-income communities, pro-abortionists showcase horrors as if they're commonplace to hide the fact that they want to allow Muffy to abort a child without her wealthy multi-millionaire parents finding out she was banging the gardener while on pot, and skipping the pill because she didn't want to toxify her body. Meanwhile, they don't support nuclear families among the impoverished because it will reduce their blindly loyal low-educated voter-base.

Taxes

Trump’s tax policies broadly tilt toward corporations and wealthier Americans.

This is an ancient fear tactic. Republicans generally want common-sense regulations. This precludes the rampant spendthrift behavior of Democrats who have indebted the country to the tune of nearly 50 trillion dollars within the past 30 years, a sharp uptick from the 1980s. The Democrats routinely tax heavily to make people feel good, and then spend that money on stupid things that serve no one but their own pockets. True facts, go look.

That’s mostly due to his promise to extend his 2017 tax overhaul ...

Which benefitted lower-to-middle income families substantially until Biden reversed it and inflation exploded, hurting those same families for 4 years and sending the country toward depression by recklessly spending M2 capital to artificially prop up the economy.

... , with a few notable changes that include lowering the corporate income tax rate to 15% from the current 21% [This is why low income families can't afford eggs under Biden/Harris...]. That also involves rolling back Democratic President Joe Biden’s income tax hikes on the wealthiest Americans [This included middle-income families, despite his claims it wouldn't.] and scrapping Inflation Reduction Act levies that finance energy measures intended to combat climate change. [This is why we are heading toward a depression, since this act spent M2 capital.]

I reference M2 capital because a recent analysis by Money Fool identified that the US Dollar was contracting within the United States. M2 capital is what the Federal Government reserves for banks and lending institutions to fuel loans. Every loan, from housing mortgages to pay-day lending institutions, is not funded by or protected via IDIC by M1 capital. M1 capital is the money you have in your bank, from your paycheck, and is circulated cash. M2 funds, when they restrict because the Government does not have the money to back these loans, are a prime indicator of the economic health of a country. There is a finite amount of money here, it cannot simply be "printed", as it's pinned to available money generated from GDP. When the US Government under Biden spent this money to pay down foreign debt when our country's credit rating dropped from AAA to AA, to raise it back up again, they made a serious mistake and it resulted in explosive inflation. While the stock market is in bullish territory, companies and individuals finance these through M1 capital. When M2 restricts, the internal value of the dollar diminishes. What cost $1 dollar yesterday costs $2 today, etc. The Government at a point would need to revalue the dollar, which will undeniably send the economy into a depression.

Those policies notwithstanding [This is a placation because the writer knows it's theoretical as to what they wrote], Trump has put more emphasis on new proposals aimed at working- and middle class Americans: exempting earned tips, Social Security wages and overtime wages from income taxes. [Finally, the Truth, supporting everything I just said.] It’s noteworthy, however, that his proposal on tips, depending on how Congress might write it, could give a back-door tax break to top wage earners by allowing them to reclassify some of their pay as tip income — a prospect that at its most extreme could see hedge-fund managers or top-flight attorneys taking advantage of a policy that Trump frames as being designed for restaurant servers, bartenders and other service workers. [This is unsupported by any information and is just a flight of fancy to bolster the negative opinions of the writer.]

Tariffs and trade

Trump’s posture on international trade is to distrust world markets as harmful to American interests. [Duh? Iran, Russia, China...] He proposes tariffs of 10% to 20% on foreign goods — and in some speeches has mentioned even higher percentages. [Reinforcing "Duh..."] He promises to reinstitute an August 2020 executive order requiring that the Food and Drug Administration buy “essential” medications only from U.S. companies. [To reduce the prices of medicines while increasing FDA oversight and corporate accountability.] He pledges to block purchases of “any vital infrastructure” in the U.S. by Chinese buyers. [How is this a negative when China wound up buying square miles of land next to a sensitive United States military base in Michigan? Note that Chinese businessmen did exactly this in other countries claiming it was for business and then these locations were militarized by Chinese military forces setting up listening posts and forward operating bases. Go look, it's been in the news of various countries in South America and Cuba.]

DEI, LGBTQ and civil rights

Trump has called for rolling back societal emphasis on diversity and for legal protections for LGBTQ citizens. Trump has called for ending diversity, equity and inclusion programs in government institutions, using federal funding as leverage.

Because they don't work and create a pseudo-Government within companies that is enforced by quasi-official United States Gestapo enforcing unwritten laws.

On transgender rights, Trump promises generally to end “boys in girls’ sports,” a practice he insists, without evidence [There's evidence. It's called SCIENCE!], is widespread. But his policies go well beyond standard applause lines from his rally speeches. Among other ideas, Trump would roll back the Biden administration’s policy of extending Title IX civil rights protections to transgender students [Because Title IX has clear definitions and the Executive Branch illegally made this change, as only Congress can create, change, or repeal laws.], and he would ask Congress to require that only two genders can be recognized at birth. [Based on Science.]

Regulation, federal bureaucracy and presidential power

The president-elect seeks to reduce the role of federal bureaucrats and regulations across economic sectors. [The Executive Branch under Biden enforced rules that violate US Law or are not granted the powers to do so, such as banning Citizens from purchasing Gas appliances or non-electric vehicles. Kamala even said she would dictate prices of all products people can buy, which when you think about it, is pretty fucking Draconian.] Trump frames all regulatory cuts as an economic magic wand. [This is conjecture and opinion, not fact. Fact indicates that these cuts are logical and have been done before to great success, and also have backfired with great failure when done incorrectly or blindly.] He pledges precipitous drops in U.S. households’ utility bills by removing obstacles to fossil fuel production, including opening all federal lands for exploration — even though U.S. energy production is already at record highs.

U.S. energy production is not at record highs, this is incorrect. The United States recently stated there's insufficient power in the grid to support the growing nation. It was highlighted in many news agencies that AI and Crypto are partly responsible, but also the shuttering of nuclear and fossil fueled power plants in favor for unreliable green energy plants resulted in a significant reduction of available power. Additionally, the electrical grid is on the verge of collapse due to poorly maintained and ancient power lines such as the case in California. Green and liberal laws have made it difficult to impossible for energy providers to do anything without a bureaucracy blocking them because one squirrel lives in a tree somewhere in miles of the work to be done. However, they'll happily invade a private residence with military force, in violation of the 4th and 14th Amendments to murder the squirrel if it resides in a house.

Trump promises to unleash housing construction by cutting regulations — though most construction rules come from state and local government. [This is due to a patchwork of laws across the United States enacted by Democrats abusing the 14th Amendment like Epstein.] He also says he would end “frivolous litigation from the environmental extremists.” [Good.]

The approach would in many ways strengthen executive branch influence. That power would come more directly from the White House. [This is a flight of fancy and ignorant, as he's asking Congress to do the work they're supposed to. Certain powers already reside with the White House in terms of these rules, which were never laws but were recommendations to States for their laws.]

He would make it easier to fire federal workers by classifying thousands of them as being outside civil service protections. [He's talking about Contractors, let's be clear about this and not lie to people.] That could weaken the government’s power to enforce statutes and rules by reducing the number of employees engaging in the work and, potentially, impose a chilling effect on those who remain.

This is fearmongering and a lie. The Government under Democrats must publicly report the pay of any Government worker, except for Contractors. Contractors are not empowered to the same authority as Government officials. Equally, Government officials must be appointed or elected, Contractors do not. Contractors for the Government are many and their companies or themselves are very highly paid far more than Government officials. Reducing them will reduce the tax burden on tax paying citizens, of which illegal immigrants are not. Full circle here.

Trump also claims that presidents have exclusive power to control federal spending even after Congress has appropriated money. Trump argues that lawmakers’ budget actions “set a ceiling” on spending but not a floor — meaning the president’s constitutional duty to “faithfully execute the laws” includes discretion on whether to spend the money. This interpretation could set up a court battle with Congress.

TRUE FACT! For monies provided to the Executive Branch, the President is ultimately responsible for the Federal Budget after Congress appropriates the funds during the Budgetary Sessions. Go look, it's in the Constitution. This is not a court battle with Congress, this person doesn't know what the fuck they're talking about.

As a candidate, he also suggested that the Federal Reserve, an independent entity that sets interest rates, should be subject to more presidential power. Though he has not offered details, any such move would represent a momentous change to how the U.S. economic and monetary systems work.

The Federal Reserve is a separate entity... under the Executive Branch. However, he never said it should be subject to more Presidential power, he said it should be subject to Presidential oversight for greater accountability. The President already can set forth changes to the interest rate, but the Reserve doesn't have to abide by it.

Education

The federal Department of Education would be targeted for elimination in a second Trump administration. [This is completely false, and a full bald-faced lie.]That does not mean that Trump wants Washington out of classrooms. He still proposes, among other maneuvers, using federal funding as leverage to pressure K-12 school systems to abolish tenure and adopt merit pay for teachers and to scrap diversity programs at all levels of education. [Good. It's been done before under Regan, and tenure is abused by radicalized (near terroristic) educators creating minions instead of workers.] He calls for pulling federal funding “for any school or program pushing Critical Race Theory, gender ideology, or other inappropriate racial, sexual, or political content on our children.”

CRT is not an official US Education supported curriculum. It's called a Theory because it has no supporting facts, is not proven, and is simply ignorant of actual history. Many curriculums are in place at public schools which are not founded in science, lacking evidence of their efficacy, and often times run counter to historical fact.

In higher education, Trump proposes taking over accreditation processes for colleges, a move he describes as his “secret weapon” against the “Marxist Maniacs and lunatics” he says control higher education. Trump takes aim at higher education endowments, saying he will collect “billions and billions of dollars” from schools via “taxing, fining and suing excessively large private university endowments” at schools that do not comply with his edicts. That almost certainly would end up in protracted legal fights.

FUCKING FINALLY! The Federal Government under the DOE should be responsible for ensuring these schools are conforming to regulations. However, the commentary is used to negate the real statement here. Many of these private universities have been illicitly spending endowments without oversight on everything except the students they're there to teach. That's why it's so fucking expensive to go to college, allowing only the elite few who can to do so successfully whilst indebting students for life. There's no protracted legal fights here, laws need to be considered. Trump is asking Congress to look into this.

As in other policy areas, Trump isn’t actually proposing limiting federal power in higher education but strengthening it. [The author just invalidated their entire argument in this one sentence.] He calls for redirecting the confiscated endowment money into an online “American Academy” offering college credentials to all Americans without a tuition charges. “It will be strictly non-political, and there will be no wokeness or jihadism allowed—none of that’s going to be allowed,” Trump said on Nov. 1, 2023.

Free online college education for everyone by taking from the rich kids and giving to the poor kids? I'm not seeing the problem here.

Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid

Trump insists he would protect Social Security and Medicare, popular programs geared toward older Americans and among the biggest pieces of the federal spending pie each year. There are questions about how his proposal not to tax tip and overtime wages might affect Social Security and Medicare. [This is circular logic intended to confuse the reader.] If such plans eventually involved only income taxes, the entitlement programs would not be affected. But exempting those wages from payroll taxes would reduce the funding stream for Social Security and Medicare outlays. [This is intentionally misleading: Author has taken their earlier argument against the fantasy that tips would become taxable by act of Congress and reversed it to hypocritically prop up this argument.] Trump has talked little about Medicaid but his first administration, in general, defaulted to approving state requests for waivers of various federal rules and it broadly endorsed state-level work requirements for recipients. [Again, what's the problem?]

Affordable Care Act and Health Care

As he has since 2015, Trump calls for repealing the Affordable Care Act and its subsidized health insurance marketplaces. [ACA increased the cost of privatized health insurance provided by employers, who were now legally required to pass the burden on to employees in order for the ACA to subsidize itself. Most working Americans get their benefits from their employers by State and Federal Laws, so the unworking or unsupported and Elderly can get Medicaid, but the ACA added another layer to this in support of health insurance companies raking in billions in profits.] But he still has not proposed a replacement: [Medicaid & Medicare exist, we now have three different insurance programs spending taxpayer monies doing the same fucking thing.] In a September debate, he insisted he had the “concepts of a plan.” In the latter stages of the campaign, Trump played up his alliance with former presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a longtime critic of vaccines and of pesticides used in U.S. agriculture. Trump repeatedly told rally crowds that he would put Kennedy in charge of “making America healthy again.” [This is just colorization to present a negative in support of the tone of the opinionated article.]

Climate and energy

Trump, who claims falsely that climate change is a “hoax,” [Because it is, as there is equal scientific facts indicating that while Humans have had an impact on the climate, it is not the only impact as other factors have greater impacts as noted historically, and various methods in support of climate change use manipulated data to support their models. When the same data is used without manipulation, through use of statistical extrapolation to fill in blanks, climate change by Humans almost disappears. Go look, it's online and from notable scientific forums. However, climate change = money.] blasts Biden-era spending on cleaner energy designed to reduce U.S. reliance on fossil fuels. He proposes an energy policy – and transportation infrastructure spending – anchored to fossil fuels: roads, bridges and combustion-engine vehicles. “Drill, baby, drill!” was a regular chant at Trump rallies. Trump says he does not oppose electric vehicles but promises to end all Biden incentives to encourage EV market development. Trump also pledges to roll back Biden-era fuel efficiency standards. [This is good for many reasons, reducing inflation quickly is one of them.]

Workers’ rights

Trump and Vice President-elect JD Vance framed their ticket as favoring America’s workers. But Trump could make it harder for workers to unionize. [This is false, Union leaders came out in vocal support for Trump, but also cited their willingness to move away from partisan politics to favor only the candidate that best meets their workers' needs.] In discussing auto workers, Trump focused almost exclusively on Biden’s push toward electric vehicles. When he mentioned unions, it was often to lump “the union bosses and CEOs” together as complicit in “this disastrous electric car scheme.” [This is true, but more investigations are needed.] In an Oct. 23, 2023, statement, Trump said of United Auto Workers, “I’m telling you, you shouldn’t pay those dues.” [This statement is presented out of context to bolster a weak argument. Go look.]

National defense and America’s role in the world

Trump’s rhetoric and policy approach in world affairs is more isolationist diplomatically, non-interventionist militarily and protectionist economically than the U.S. has been since World War II.

This is not accurately presented: Since WWII, the United States has stepped into one problem after the next, expending American lives needlessly and involving ourselves in political wars we should not be involved in. It's not isolationist to block China, Russia and Iran. It would be economically viable to restrict our involvement in overseas crises that doesn't benefit the United States in any meaningful way.

But the details are more complicated. He pledges expansion of the military [Military equipment procurement], promises to protect Pentagon spending from austerity efforts and proposes a new missile defense shield — an old idea from the Reagan era during the Cold War. [We have a modern missile defense shield, it is continuously upgraded. It's not an old idea, we have them today.] Trump insists he can end Russia’s war in Ukraine and the Israel-Hamas war, without explaining how. [He has, and prior to Biden, there was peace based on his plans. This is either statement by ignorance, or intentionally lying via omission.] Trump summarizes his approach through another Reagan phrase: “peace through strength.” But he remains critical of NATO and top U.S. military brass. “I don’t consider them leaders,” Trump said of Pentagon officials that Americans “see on television.” He repeatedly praised authoritarians like Hungary’s Viktor Orban and Russia’s Vladimir Putin. [This is false representation. He hasn't praised them. He said he respects them, which is simply diplomatic to offer an olive branch. This is intended to dissuade and diminish the opinion of the reader regarding President Trump, rather than stick to facts.]

In short, I approve of Regan's phrase because...

KANE LIVES!

#just azure things #just azzy things #wicked bitch of the midwest #what the hell is wrong with you #you got some wicked tastes girl #dankmark #dank #kane for president #kane lives #peace through power #the brotherhood of nod wasn't wrong #for the brotherhood #the brotherhood of nod