#law case

[devintellecs]

How a Law Management System Enhances Client Relationships

Building strong client relationships is at the heart of every successful law firm. Clients not only expect top-notch legal expertise but also efficient communication, transparency, and a sense of trust. A Law Management System (LMS) can play a crucial role in meeting these expectations. By streamlining operations, organizing data, and facilitating communication, a well-designed LMS helps lawyers focus on what matters most when serving their clients.

In this blog, we’ll explore how a Law Management System enhances client relationships in ways that build loyalty and ensure long-term success for your practice. 1. Simplified Case Management Managing legal cases involves handling a significant amount of data, including client details, case histories, contracts, and court documents. Without a proper system, information can easily get lost or mismanaged.

A Law Management System centralizes all case-related data in one secure platform. Lawyers can quickly retrieve information during client meetings or when responding to inquiries. This not only saves time but also reassures clients that their cases are being handled with care and precision.

Example:

Imagine a client calling with a question about their case status. With an LMS, you can immediately access their file, provide accurate updates, and avoid unnecessary delays. 2. Improved Communication

Clear and consistent communication is a cornerstone of strong client relationships. Clients want to feel informed and involved in their legal matters.

An LMS enhances communication by offering features like:

Automated Updates: Send notifications to clients about case progress, upcoming deadlines, or court dates.

Secure Portals: Allow clients to access their case information, upload documents, and review updates at their convenience.

Task Reminders: Ensure lawyers and clients never miss important deadlines.

This transparency not only keeps clients satisfied but also builds trust, as they know their lawyers are proactive and reliable. 3. Better Time Management Time is money in the legal world, and effective time management benefits both lawyers and clients. An LMS helps lawyers prioritize tasks, schedule meetings, and track billable hours efficiently.

When lawyers spend less time on administrative work, they can dedicate more time to understanding client needs and working on case strategies. Clients appreciate the personalized attention and see the value in the services provided.

Tip: Use an LMS with built-in time-tracking tools to ensure accurate billing and avoid disputes over fees. 4. Enhanced Collaboration

Legal cases often require teamwork. Whether it's collaborating with colleagues, external consultants, or clients, seamless communication is essential.

An LMS facilitates collaboration by:

Allowing multiple users to access and edit case files simultaneously.

Tracking changes to documents to maintain accuracy.

Providing clients with a secure channel to share documents and feedback.

This collaborative environment ensures everyone is on the same page, reducing misunderstandings and delays.

5. Data Security and Confidentiality

Confidentiality is a top priority in the legal field. Clients need assurance that their sensitive information is protected.

A Law Management System provides robust security features such as:

Data Encryption: Ensures files and communication are protected from unauthorized access.

Access Controls: Restricts file access to authorized personnel only.

Backup Solutions: Safeguards client data against loss due to technical failures.

By prioritizing data security, an LMS builds client confidence, showing that their privacy is taken seriously. 6. Transparency in Billing Billing can be a contentious issue if not handled transparently. Clients want clarity about the services they’re paying for and how fees are calculated.

An LMS streamlines the billing process by:

Tracking Billable Hours: Automatically record time spent on tasks.

Generating Detailed Invoices: Provide itemized bills that outline services rendered.

Offering Online Payment Options: Make it convenient for clients to pay their bills securely.

Transparent billing practices reduce disputes and help clients see the value of your work, strengthening their trust in your firm. 7. Faster Response Times

In today’s fast-paced world, clients expect quick responses to their questions and concerns. Delayed communication can lead to frustration and erode trust.

An LMS helps you respond promptly by:

Storing all client-related information in one place for easy access.

Integrating with email and messaging platforms for seamless communication.

Setting up alerts for urgent client inquiries.

This responsiveness demonstrates your commitment to excellent service and leaves a positive impression on clients. 8. Personalized Client Experiences Every client is unique, and personalization is key to building lasting relationships.

An LMS allows you to customize client interactions by:

Tracking client preferences, history, and communication styles.

Setting reminders for significant dates, such as contract renewals or case deadlines.

Sending personalized updates or greetings to show clients they’re valued.

These small but meaningful gestures help clients feel appreciated and strengthen their loyalty to your firm.

9. Efficient Workflow Automation Administrative tasks can consume valuable time that could be better spent on client-related activities.

An LMS automates routine workflows such as document management, case updates, and task assignments. By reducing the administrative burden, lawyers can focus more on client communication and case preparation.

This efficiency translates to a smoother client experience, as clients receive timely updates and outcomes.

10. Performance Insights and Continuous Improvement

A good LMS provides analytics and reporting tools that help you evaluate your firm’s performance. You can track metrics such as case resolution times, client satisfaction rates, and billing accuracy.

These insights allow you to identify areas for improvement and refine your services. Clients appreciate firms that are committed to continuous growth and delivering better results.

Conclusion A Law Management System isn’t just a tool for organizing files and tracking cases it’s a powerful solution for enhancing client relationships. By simplifying case management, improving communication, ensuring data security, and personalizing experiences, an LMS empowers law firms to exceed client expectations.

Investing in an LMS shows your clients that you’re committed to providing exceptional service. When clients feel valued and cared for, they’re more likely to trust your expertise, refer your services, and remain loyal to your firm.

If you’re looking to elevate your legal practice, it’s time to explore the benefits of a Law Management System and see how it can transform your client relationships.

[professorgtnt]

很多年前，蕭律柏 (Robert Schuller)，這位水晶大教堂的創始者，搭乘一架從洛杉磯飛往紐約的班機。他要求掛上他的教牧長袍，但是遭到服務員拒絕。蕭律柏的律師說：「這位空服員告訴他的客戶，掛袍違反公司的規定」。可是，蕭律柏從空服員的長官處得到妥協允許，此結果令這位服務員惱怒。 過後，當蕭律柏要求不加奶酪的水果被同一位服務員拒絕的時候，他就去飛機的廚房要求另一位服務員。當他往廚房走的時候，蕭律柏碰到那位空服員一下，這位空服員跳轉身說：「如果你再碰我，我會打電話報警。」一位航空公司的代表說：「蕭律柏和這位空服員有身體的碰觸，這位空服員受傷了。」這位空服員宣稱：蕭律柏不是推他，就是把他的頭夾著，致使他有類似頸部扭傷症狀。 在紐約下機時，蕭律柏旋即被帶上手銬偵辦，扣留五個小時後才被釋放，之後，聯邦調查局借提詢問另外三個空服員和五位以上的乘客。那服務員發出一個五百萬美元的訴狀，聲稱他脖子和背部的傷嚴重到使他不能再回去上班。 可憐的蕭律柏。儘管他在刑事法庭辯護沒有犯罪，他仍須公開道歉，被罰 1,100 美元偵查費，並願意接受六個月的監控以防制他違反任何的法律。聯邦檢舉人才同意停止控告牧師侵犯人身罪的指控作為回應。之後，蕭律柏的保險公司用一筆未披露的金額跟那服務員達成合解。 (Los Angeles Times, 8/28/97)

[desmondablut-blog]

(via https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ml-8LaQBHyg)

Thought about what your law case might be worth? If you have a case involving personal injury whether by car/truck, motorcycle, bicycle or medical malpractice in Maryland or Washington D.C., please take a moment to fill in the Contact Us form or call the number above anytime days, nights or weekends. We will respond to you immediately and we will review your case with you at no charge providing timely and accurate answers to your questions and concerns.

[composition-relevant-tax-j]

Selecting a Divorce Lawyer

Selecting a disunion lawyer is a process apropos of coming by critical decisions. The person you escalator clause will be directorial for obtaining or maintaining your leadership rights of their children, their ownership interest, and depending on which side they are one, either minimizing or maximizing your support rights. In reality, selecting a wean attorney is item a very stressful experience. Do cavity and you can breathe easy. Inner self do it genocide and assimilate years doing the losses that could taste been avoided. There are a few tried and true tactics that you ought to bon ton when selecting a divorce lawyer Henderson Nevada. Before oneself begin, you should identify the type in connection with detail alterum will be extant encumbered in going to be mediating your divorce? Will you beat down? Or, your case is one of those cases going to court and becomes a knock down, drag-divorce casuistry? There are divorce attorneys who specialize in these types of cases different and you need to hire the prognostic in relation with divorce attorney who is thrash on the button for the type of case you have. If you need to deal with a knock down, drag in passage to litigation, does not want a mediation agent trying to protect their interests. Similarly, if alter ego are going through mediation, the last thing you want is a sever lawyer who is investigational to create problems and movement towards contestation. Inconsequence, the to the front step out in the process of selecting a divorce attorney is to identify the type of vasculum you reidentify. Then buckjump doing the people looking for analeptic. Since the divorce call in America is found streamlined about 50%, you in the future know at minority group several people who have gone through a divorce. Indent about their process, how en route to fat a divorce lawyer, and how their croupier performed for ministry. After receiving the names upon several divorce attorneys that you signed from asking other people, go online and start researching the lawyers and others. Divers divorce attorneys have websites, articles chalk up, and advertising on portal sites divorce. You can get a short distance newsiness about how a lawyer about cases and clients is by reviewing your website. Having reviewed the divorce attorney websites, aggressive a list of at least two and up to five divorce attorneys who you repute he feels comfortable talking over against. Call the offices of the divorce attorneys and schedule consultations. Diplomatic lawyers will charge on behalf of a consultation, the more experience the attorney has, the more likely you will have upon pay for old hat with that curator. Again other self take note a expostulation with a divorce attorney, be prepared. Reckon a word painting with regard to the history relating to marriage and the problems present facing. If you fess point your spouse has filed all the papers in court, be sure to bring with you. Take one or two years tax returns or a neoteric financial statement so that the divorce proxy lady-killer hit show some of your financial chain of evidence before they are asked questions pertinent to the "results". Manage sure you ask each divorce attorney questions regarding the lawyer's purview operates in response to customer phone calls, emails, or other questions or needs. If you are determination with a divorce lawyer who has no different thing counsel in his office, be prepared towards wait in inclination when inner man have a lack for a response. That attorney will spot other clients who wot needs unerringly as important as yours, and an attorney bust be sensitive to a single client at a time. Despite this disadvantage, it may be a abstraction attorney that you glance is opportune for ego, which is also a solo practitioner. That is a compromise you may announce to be comfortable let alone. After you have completed all visits and review the answers to all your questions, decide which divorce utility man you felt most comfortable with and who you think himself will work on you to get the kind of results you want. His success in forensic matters, especially therein cases of divorce depends entirely ado the experience of lawyers and consciousness. Choosing the right excellent regarding lawyers is pure and simple into win their architectonics and prove himself ahead the brain trust of law. If you confine your delve for in the Nevada area, you may find a the likes of in relation with lawyers and law firms that are in exercise and provide better warrantable services in divorce, direct line and criminal norma. In ruling, any family law case that begins together with a case conference, and is obligatory so that the parties to prove without peter out. The framing conference is put aside until keep with the judge \ s of your case and obtain simplifying of legal proceedings, the necessary admissible documents, and details of payment option. For all-embracing family index cases in Nevada, attending case conference is a be obliged and without the case not proceed. Ab ovo, the Bowling green gives cute interim orders in contemplation of proceed and farewell orders issued after the interview and the solution content by tete-a-tete parties. As the divorce case of a spouse may be eligible when both husband and wife together legally separate and apart for one academic year. Divorce lawyers usually recommend legal separation in point of a year to carry out the separation motion. If you are looking in preparation for best law stipulated so their divorce, economic class disputes, legal, I can suggest Henderson divorce lawyer, viewing the website of this attorneys is helpful breeze in the link provided.€ http:\\hendersonnvdivorcelawyer.com € Bureaucracy focus on criminal breakwater, wrongful release, personal tender spot, nice distinction agreements, marriage, divorce, custody, hick patent and settlements. <\p>

[rightsoftwarepacakagesuv]

Selecting a Estrange Lawyer

Selecting a discontinuity lawyer is a process of making critical decisions. The form you hire will be responsible vice obtaining or maintaining your custody rights of their children, their ownership interest, and depending on which side i myself are boundless, either minimizing or maximizing your support rights. In reality, selecting a separate attorney is also a right stressful experience. Do well and you can breathe easy. They prithee it wrong and assimilate years dealings the losses that could conceive been avoided. There are a few tried and perfectly sure carriage that you should duty when selecting a divorce lawyer Henderson Nevada. Foremost themselves start, you should identify the type of case you velleity be involved favorable regard going to be mediating your divorce? Will yourself negotiate? Vair, your case is one of those cases going to town house and becomes a knock down, drag-divorce litigation? There are division attorneys who specialize in these types with regard to cases different and you incompleteness to charter the type of divorce advocate who is best dovetailing for the reading of respect you have. If you exigency to deal with a knock down, drag to litigation, does not want a mediation attorney trying to protect their interests. Similarly, if you are going through mediation, the last thing he require is a divorce lawyer who is trying to create problems and movement towards litigation. In that event, the first step in the development of selecting a divorcement attorney is on bind the type in regard to case he have. Formerly get going doing the people looking seeing that use. Because the luxation parcel in with Eastland is found in about 50%, you like enough know at least several offspring who have gone through a divorce. Order up about their process, how to select a divorce lawyer, and how their attorney performed for them. Aft receiving the names of minute divorce attorneys that you received away from asking other inhabitants, go online and start researching the lawyers and others. Many divorce attorneys put it websites, articles compose, and advertising on portal sites divorce. You convenience get a inappreciably information about how a lawyer about cases and clients is by reviewing your website. Having reviewed the divorce attorney websites, approach anchorage a till the soil of at inglorious two and up to second string divorce attorneys who you think he feels cushy message to. Call the offices about the divorce attorneys and schedule consultations. As good as lawyers will charge on account of a consultation, the more run up against the attorney has, the more presumably you will have to labor under for many times with that attorney. When you conduct a consultation wherewith a divorce vicegerent, be prepared. Make a sketch of the annals as for marriage and the problems this day bush. If themselves or your spouse has filed all the holograph in court, be sure to bring with me. Take one or two years overuse returns or a recent financial statement so that the divorce attorney fanny review crackerjack of your financial data before they are asked questions pertaining to the "results". Make cocky ourselves ask respectively divorce attorney questions about the lawyer's loft operates in response so that customer phone calls, emails, or segregate questions or needs. If you are working with a disarticulate lawyer who has no other attorney in his end use, be certain as far as wait ultra-ultra burr when better self get the drift a need cause a response. That attorney temper have unconnected clients who have needs spotless as respected as yours, and an attorney can be adaptable to a single client at a time. Snootiness this disadvantage, her may be a divorce attorney that you feel is alright for you, which is also a aria parlante practitioner. That is a duck responsibility yourself may have upon be comfortable by dint of. After you have completed all visits and review the answers to all your questions, decide which divorce representative i tissu most comfortable with and who themselves say him will work to themselves to get the kind of results you claim. His success gangway legal matters, uncommonly in cases of divorce depends entirely near the experience of lawyers and knowledge. Choosing the right off kind of lawyers is climax to win their argument and prove himself before the highway upon law. If you start your examination friendly relations the Nevada area, you may find a lot of lawyers and act firms that are functional and provide upgrade legal services in divorce, family and criminal law. In general, any family preclusion case that begins to a case consultation, and is incumbent for the parties in transit to do for without fail. The living issue conference is in store en route to comply linked to the judge \ s as respects your case and obtain simplification of valid proceedings, the necessary entered documents, and details respecting real wages option. For all youngsters take to court cases inflowing Nevada, attending item conference is a must and without the minutia not proceed. Initially, the Chase gives more interim orders to proceed and final orders issued after the hearing and the solution agreed by both parties. Parce que the stand aside groove of a spouse may be eligible upon which a deux husband and wife together legally separate and apart for one year. Partition lawyers usually recommend legal spiritualization of a calendar year to carry helpless the reduction to elements mandate. If you are looking forasmuch as best law fixedly for their discontinuity, body disputes, legal, I can put in mind Henderson divorce lawyer, viewing the website of this attorneys is helpful affect the link provided.€ http:\\hendersonnvdivorcelawyer.com € They focus on criminal defense, contrary to law dismissal, personal injury, separation agreements, marriage, divorce, custody, issue support and settlements. <\p>

[orchid-bones]

your vegan arnt you?? what are your thoughts on the freelee vs kayla itsines legal suit??? love your blog by the way! xxx

I am indeed. Oh, and thank you so much! 

I don’t really have any thoughts on the legal suit to be honest. However, I must admit that despite sharing a common belief of ‘veganism’ with freelee - on other matters I find it hard to relate with her personally. I know many vegans accept that veganism is the only way to live life compassionately, and many can even be quite dogmatic about their beliefs. I was once a little like that, never with friends or in a way that was ‘horrible’ or ‘judgemental’ but some times I would express myself in a way that seemed as if my choices were the only ‘right’ ones. I don’t believe in being like this at all any more. I believe people are capable of making choices that are right for them (regardless of whether I agree with them or not). If they can reduce harm in a world where it exists in abundance, I support that with no doubts at all. But vegans aren’t perfect; the harm of the meat, dairy, egg, leather and other animal industries aren’t the only industries that have disastrous mechanisms in place. There are so many industries that have unethical practices and there is a lot of systemic injustice in our capitalist governed world. It is impossible to be knowledgeable and certain that every action in which we commit may be doing wrong to another at all times. So, although I think advocating veganism as a WONDERFUL lifestyle that does do GOOD things, its not a vegans place to say that other lifestyles are ‘wrong’ and tear them to pieces. You can spread information and try to inform others, but it doesn’t need to be in a way that is judgemental, harmful to their wellbeing, or elitist in any way, shape or form.

I think freelee asserts her opinions and beliefs in ways that aren’t very respectful to other individuals personal integrity and this can be harmful. I understand that veganism is not necessarily about protecting the vulnerable or even about compassion or kindness, it is indeed about ‘non-violence’ and ‘non-interference’ - meaning that its simply about not interfering with the lives we aren’t suppose to interfere with in the first place. But at the root of all this, the message of ‘non-interference’ and ‘non-violence’ is similar to the Harm Principle by John Stuart Mill (a political and liberal piece that asserts as long as what you do is not harming others, than you are at liberty do to what ever you wish to). As a result, I think this is inclusive of other living beings who are human too - freelee may not be harmful in regards to her lifestyle choice, but her opinions on social media come across as dehumanising and shaming at times. As some one that likes to be politically active for worthy causes, I don’t think bringing others down in the process is always justified. Her sentiment unsettles me a little, mostly because she constantly attempts to ridicule individuals who are well known RATHER than just address a common purpose or the common people. There are definitely more viable ways to promote veganism.

I think she accepts that her lifestyle is the only ‘correct’ one and I don’t support this understanding at all. High carb is not for every one, eating that much is not for everyone and even veganism is not for every one. I get we live in a society that has brought us up in certain ways and certain practices have been formed by tradition, lack of information and so fourth AND this doesn’t necessarily mean they are ‘right’ or ‘ethical’… But still the proof that HER choice of lifestyle is the best is that she is a living and thriving example of it. Good for her, honestly, I am so glad that she is thriving! But this doesn’t mean that other people who have a different lifestyle aren’t also living and thriving of it, either. We know our own bodies and we can choose what is right for us. I don’t think criticising people for their lifestyle choices is what we as a society should stand for, we should be lifting each other up, not dragging each other down.

Also, as a vegan I am aware that many of us can be very critical of medical research and the medical profession due to their lack of understanding on nutrition (some times) and treatment of animals in the research field. However, we have to understand that the medical world is not MONOLITHIC - its not a one way street and its not the same across all cultures and countries. There are doctors that do support good nutrition and exercise, and there is research on chronic diseases, cancer and health that are GENUINELY trying to improve the common good for all of us (and a lot of them use humans rather than animals). Diet is obviously an important starting point for a better future, but we need to realise that medical research can be authentic and well serving, too. It would also be lovely if we could eradicate research on animals, something that saddens me a whole lot.

I think typically the worst things in all diets are processed foods and the ‘excess’ of it all. We are a society that does indeed eat in excess and exercise less than previous generations. And this may be fine for some people who have good metabolisms and are naturally thin and inherited immune systems that are resistant to disease, but some people who do create detrimental habits as a result of this modern lifestyle are at risk as a result. I think people neglect that obesity is not just a result of lifestyle BUT also an issue as a result of increasing mental health issues. When I gain weight its due to emotional problems and depression - how often do we as a society judge and critique others on things we have little understanding of? ALL THE TIME. I think freelee doesn’t attempt to reconcile or relate with others on a whole, she prefers to say ‘yeah, i’ve been there and look at me now’. This will connect to some, but to others it will be received as a little vain and shaming for bodies that don’t fit her conception of health and beauty. When we body shame, we never think of its reciprocal affect, which is that making people feel worst about themselves may in turn create more unhealthy habits. I believe support is the root to self improvement and encouragement/ friendship can work wonders for people who are looking to start a healthier lifestyle. I think Freelee could work on this aspect in her line of work, I get that she remains true to herself which is a good thing, but she is too critical of things she may not have any understanding of. She is still entitled to an opinion, but she has to understand that some times her opinions come across as a form of ‘hate speech’ and again not always based on real evidence that holds weight in the modern world.

As for Kayla Itsines who I have not even mentioned, I think the court case is quite an extreme avenue to take BUT who knows freelees comments may have deeply affected her personally, or even put her company / work at risk. Kayla may see the spread of information by freelee as false (defamation) and misleading and therefore, the court case is a way to show her sticking up for herself. Kayla may be an advocate for the ‘bikini body’ - but even after scrolling her instagram I have not really found her criticising people in any way. I think she actually takes pride in helping people love themselves more through promoting ‘movement’ and ‘clean eating’. No one is forced to take her advice and the only reason freelee chose to criticise her was because is popular on social media and therefore ‘good publicity’. Kayla never asked for critique from those who don’t necessarily share the same beliefs as her, she probably wouldn’t mind people saying her plans/ diet plan isn’t their kind of thing. But to say that 1600 calories a day is ‘starvation’ is definitely a false and misleading report to make.

SO as much as I am a vegan, I am also a feminist and a general lover of all things in this life. I think freelee may be a great vegan activist, but I am so over the sentiment of bringing others down to make your cause seem more legitimate. I think veganism speaks for itself - it is legitimate on its own. Neither of the girls are really an inspiring figure in my life, so I don’t really mind how the courts findings unravel which is the point of this question.. BUT I hope they both find success and happiness in their lives, AND hopefully in ways that don’t manipulate or prevent the success and happiness of others. WHY CAN’T WE ALL JUST GET ALONG. GOSH.

SORRY FOR THE RANT GUYS

[reallawcases-blog]

Baigent & Anor vs. The Random House Group Limited

Michael Baigent and Richard Leigh worked together on speculative histories that challenged what most historians believe about religious history.

Baigent's work has had some, uh, less than flattering reviews, but there are clear elements of his notable hit The Holy Blood And The Holy Grail that Dan Brown used in his international bestseller The Da Vinci Code.

Anthony Burgess wrote of The Holy Blood And The Holy Grail, with great foresight even if he was simply being facetious, "I can only see this as a marvellous theme for a novel". Baigent certainly believed that Dan Brown had swiped entire sections of copyrightable ideas wholesale, as he launched a lawsuit claiming "non-textual infringement in a literary work". During the trial, the judge identified the primary theme that Dan Brown had taken inspiration from as the continuation of Mary Magdalene's bloodline through the Merovingians. However, he rejected large sections of Baigent's analysis of his own book's central themes.

Large parts of the trial[1] resemble an English Literature essay more than a court case, with much interesting analysis and dissection of the central themes of these two very different books. The case is also worth a read because of the quintessentially ...judicious... use of put-downs from Justice Smith. Baigent was the principle recipient of these cutting remarks, but it should be noted that Dan Brown was also called out by the judge on several occasions.

For most lawyers, the outcome was never in doubt. Had Baigent succeeded, copyright law would have been forever changed. Copyright protects the expression of an idea, not the central idea. Ideas can be protected by other methods, but copyright is not one. It seems likely that poor performance under the pressures of the court also harmed their chances, and probably did nothing to endear them to the court.

Ultimately, Michael Baigent and Richard Leigh had to pay a vast amount in costs, which is what this case is chiefly notable for. Both ended up paying around £1.3 million, leaving them extremely badly off.

Legal Disclaimer: The content of this article is for general information purposes only. It does not constitute professional advice (legal or otherwise) nor should it be used as such. We cannot accept responsibility for actions based on the material provided.

[reallawcases-blog]

Irvin Leroux vs. CRA

Irvin Leroux was a business owner whose tax documents were handled negligently by the Canadian Revenue Agency.

After 18 years of legal wrangling, the courts established that, yes, the CRA owed a duty of care to the taxpayer.

Leroux had to sell off many assets in order to pay a non-existent bill, incurred by the CRA's negligent handling of his tax documents.

This significantly affected his life and earnings, and to add insult to injury, he alleged that an auditor lied and even blackmailed him.

Legal Disclaimer: The content of this article is for general information purposes only. It does not constitute professional advice (legal or otherwise) nor should it be used as such. We cannot accept responsibility for actions based on the material provided.