Mathematical cognitive science is actually just formalization of human thinking, but it is much like computer science paired with quantum mechanics, much like quantum computing.

seen from France
seen from China
seen from Saudi Arabia

seen from France
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from China

seen from T1
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Hong Kong SAR China

seen from Malaysia
seen from Russia

seen from Malaysia

seen from Russia

seen from Saudi Arabia

seen from Saudi Arabia
Mathematical cognitive science is actually just formalization of human thinking, but it is much like computer science paired with quantum mechanics, much like quantum computing.
Connecting random dots is growing. What has started 10 years ago in an interest of where the attibutes of particles may come from.... ended in non-linear logic, conception of probabilistic determinism (feedback loops in linear logical systems, leading to 'axiomatic networks', or such...), weird concepts for interpreting quantum entanglement, twisting some concepts that were part of the main idea behind string theory, and, on another thought branch, the correlations in self-referent(, self-replicating, self-interfering and self-simplifying) loops...
... and ending in a network of insane-sounding gibberish.
The pattern is somewhat visible in this content overview... Starting from the merely meta-mathematical side, math-like, somewhat math-theoretical-physics combo, theoretical physics... and somewhat it ended in cognitive science...
I thought about splitting that last part from the first parts, but it wouldn't be so great as all the stuff beforehand needs to be known/considered as well...
I don't know where this "chaos" will lead me...
The last part is somewhat what I may consider as "the end result of all previous parts combined".
A section stuck in my mind the most today: What this means in regards of different neurotypes and the 'fluidity of cognitive algorithmics"...
Oh well... It's really on the threshold of silly and insane, I suppose...
Art lies // in the context of its contents
Word combat 30/12/2020 - Modern Nihilism
These were some thoughts I had while I thought about the meaninglessness of life...
...totally meaningless in the first manner, but meaningful given it a context...
Combinatorics means "combining" few data to gather further data and get implications.
Pattern recognition, on the other side, means fusing much data into fewer, like deriving an equation.
Both thinking tendencies are used alternately and paralelly in my broad band thinking
Also, there happens to also be a "Mischfrequenzdenken" (mixed frequency thinking) with high frequency, low frequency pattern recognition, and high/ low frequency combinatorics.
Plus, I throw in another item of interest: the cognitive functions of the MBTI (Myers Briggs Type Indicator), specially the Perceiving functions;
introverted Sensing Si: (lives in the past, recreates experiences afterwards) theoretical practice, low frequency pattern recognition
introverted iNtuition Ni: (lives in the far future, plans ahead) practical theory, low frequency combinatorics
extroverted Sensing Se: (lives in the present, directly experience things without much cognitive iterations) practical practice, high frequency pattern recognition
extroverted iNtuition Ne: (lives in the many possibilities of the closer future, recreate the outer world in the imagination) theoretical theory, high frequency combinatorics
What does low and high frequency mean in these cases:
LOW frequency means the "wavelength" is longer, the process is more subconscious, but persists far longer and is more stable. It is a slight "gut feeling"
HIGH frequency means the "wavelengths" are ultra short, high energy, thoughts persist for a shorter period of time but are more intense and conscious. Likely unstable, but "piercing the veil", possible "Eureka"-moments.
This diagram I made covers these ideas a bit:
The dots are thoughts/impressions: the extroverted functions are high frequency, thus persist shorter but have more branches and crossings, the low frequency ones, the introverted functions' thought processes, last longer, but have less branches and "focus more on themselves" whilst the high frequency ones spread all their energy around.
//if you don’t forget you create alternate selves...
The all seeing I - Manifestations of the pre-frontal cortex - Dissociative Personalities and the (dis)connection to the third eye - the blind seer and the epiphysis crysis - Psychotropical thoughts and results of consciousness-widening thinking...;
A brief introduction to the calabi-yau-manifold that is my self, and I don’t mean any of the selves you see as reflections, but the holograph that arises out of each of those mirrors - that divine imagination is the “mind`s I”, that’s me and I can’t have a name nor shape nor anything physical for I AM what builds up the physical world, I AM CONSCIOUSNESS that is conscious about its own consciousness; You name it! I contain myself! And so do you!
Welcome to the enterprise through the mind and matter of the soul!
The prosthetic knot - imagine this knot is the coordinate system of the non-euclidean plane in means of Gödel's Incompleteness!
In the upshot I have regarded that the most complex shapes simplify itself so much that the highest and most complex form of creation is the very brief moment when it ceases to exist and loses its complexity. Dying is literally what we call consciousness.
Senua Gwyddion (The conscious quest to question my own consciousness)