(via Gen Z & Modernity: The Brutal Rebellion - YouTube)
seen from United States
seen from Poland
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Poland
seen from China
seen from Singapore
seen from Italy
seen from China

seen from Malaysia
seen from China
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Sweden
seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from Chile
(via Gen Z & Modernity: The Brutal Rebellion - YouTube)
What's scary is that on the internet you can immediately see what someone's political beliefs are, while in person you cannot.
People can also lie, or hide their opinions in person, while online (if posted about), those are immediately obvious.
That sets the ground for the online encounters to leave stronger impressions than the in person ones.
god what is happening in the uk ... what is happening in the world really. In the netherlands ,,,
Prof. Francis Boyle Update on Coronavirus Bioweapon
Towards a Cognitive Theory of Politics
In recent years, a consensus has been forming about how we reason and develop the opinions we defend. In his influential 2012 book The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion, Jonathan Haidt argued that the first principle of moral psychology is: Intuition comes first and reasoning follows. Intuition is the reflexive gut feeling of like or dislike we experience in response to the things we see in the social world around us. In Thinking Fast and Slow, psychologist Daniel Kahneman observed that conscious reasoning requires language, the construction of an argument, and therefore time, so it can happen only after our intuition has already told us whether we approve or disapprove of something. In their book The Enigma of Reason, Hugo Mercier and Dan Sperber argue that the main evolved purpose of reason is to justify our intuitions and to persuade others that our own intuitions are correct. When it comes to social issues that we care about, reason is usually a post hoc rationalization of feelings already felt and decisions already taken. In other words, it turns out that David Hume was right almost 300 years ago when he said:
Reason is, and ought only to be, the slave of the passions, and can never pretend to any other office but to serve and obey them.
(via Towards a Cognitive Theory of Politics - Quillette)
आशिक साह को ‘धड्कन’ Part 2
आशिक साह को ‘धड्कन’ Part 2
– धडकन “Part 2 ”
टा उको मा हात राखेर म भुइ मा बसे ।
अनि खोज्नु थाले । जिन्दगी को परिभाषा । तर गाह्रो भयो भेटाउन । भेटिन मैले ठेट परिभाषा ।
सोच्दा सोच्दै केही कुरा थाहा पाए । जिन्दगी पनि एउटा गाडी झै हो । स्टार्ट भएसी कतै रोक्नै पर्छ । कुनै नकुनै स्टेशन मा ।
मात्र यति कोसिस गर्नु कि त्यो यात्रा छोटै भए पनि सुखद मय बितोस् । कसैले आफ्नो आयु लम्बयाउन सक्दैन । त्यो निश्चित हुन्छ ।
र निश्चित समय का…
View On WordPress
error 500
Still can't comprehend...
Americas first #InauseationDay 🤢