reducing system size as important therapy goal??
Hi, we have a question for other (formerly) “big” systems (”big” as self-identified, don’t need to put a number on it for the sake of this conversation), because our therapist seems to think that one of the reasons our progress stagnates is that our system size (number of system mates) stays the same and doesn’t go down and some of us actively stop that number from changing. And I know it’s a problem and we do want to change it eventually, but tbh it’s not our biggest problem? I think? (we and our therapist also disagree on how to get to that point, she wants to do it against some misguided system mates’ objections, we want to first convince everyone that it’s ok before we actually do it)
btw our therapist knows her stuff about DID and knows us for a very long time, 9 years now I think, so she’s not just saying it out of ignorance. I still think she’s wrong but idk, we might be wrong too.
So, idk, what do y’all other “big” or formerly big systems think - was/is reducing system size important for your recovery? Is holding on to a really big number of system mates such a roadblock to recovery that one should go “headfirst through a wall” to try and change that number? What are your experiences with this? Did your system size change and what does that mean for you? Does it stay high and is that a huge problem for you or not?
Idk we find it a bit weird that our therapist, who’s otherwise really good and doesn’t push integration and never unification, would say we need to reduce our number. She said this when we asked her why she thinks we’re doing worse over the last couple of years and not better overall (as a trend).








