another hommage á MC.Escher - stairs..
seen from Poland

seen from Switzerland

seen from Switzerland
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from Finland
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from China
seen from Russia

seen from China

seen from Malaysia

seen from China
seen from China
seen from Egypt
another hommage á MC.Escher - stairs..
american journalists are reporting on khameini’s death like he’s the protagonist in a shonen manga
In reblogging this post about propaganda, this person writes:
This also applies to terms like "mythology" or "religion". I study myths for a living and. It impresses me how much people use words like "this is just a myth", to disqualify an opponent's argument, as if it belonged to an inferior mode of thinking, when they themselves use the same thing, use hypothesis that are beyond assessment or criticism, self-evident truths beyond repproach, you know, like a myth.
The point they're making here seems to be:
You think your worldview is based on truth.
Other worldviews seem like myths to you.
Your own beliefs are myths too.
This kind of relativism is built on a foundation of muddy semantics and half-digested postmodernism. It claims that everyone lives by unexamined assumptions and therefore nobody can claim the truth about anything.
This isn't just false, it's a profoundly terrible argument on multiple levels.
As I am fond of repeating:
Words Mean Things. Specific Things.
Myth can refer to:
A symbolic story (e.g., creation myths)
A false belief (e.g., the myth of multitasking)
An unexamined cultural assumption (Barthes)
These are not the same. Treating them as interchangeable is at best clueless, at worst dishonest.
The fact that randomnumbers751650 conflates these makes me doubt their claim to "study myths for a living."
They've also clearly never studied the philosophy or history of science, or they'd know that Scientific hypotheses ≠ myths
A scientific hypothesis is:
Falsifiable
Testable
Provisional and subject to revision from the moment it is proposed
Calling a hypothesis a myth requires ignorance of how both words are defined.
Propaganda ≠ myth ≠ science ≠ religion
Propaganda is deliberate mass persuasion.
Religion (in most cases) is faith-based belief or communal practice.
Science is a falsifiable method.
Myth is symbolic or cultural narrative.
These have different goals, standards, and truth claims. Treating them as the same turns any meaningful discussion into nonsensical gibberish.
What's happening in this argument's rhetoric?
It switches definitions of "myth" mid-sentence
It falsely flattens all truth claims into the same category
It avoids asking whether a belief is true
This perspective, if embraced, removes the tools needed to evaluate any belief at all.
Words mean things. Specific things.
Other important terms people should know.
Post-truth Relativism
Epistemology
Semantics
The Distortion of Words // 2025
🎭 The Roger Stone Playbook: The Inversion of Reality and the Birth of "Dirty Tricks" Politics
If Roy Cohn provided Donald Trump with the legal framework for corporate defiance and survival, it was Roger Stone—the legendary, self-proclaimed "agent provocateur" of the Republican Party—who engineered the modern theatrical infrastructure of political warfare that has completely consumed the American democratic space.
Stone, whose career spans from the Watergate scandal under Richard Nixon to the current administrative landscape of 2026, has spent over fifty years perfecting a dark art form: transforming the political arena into a pure spectacle of disinformation, division, and manufactured chaos.
To understand how the current administration manipulates public discourse, you have to look directly at the specific principles Stone injected into the DNA of modern politics.
🏛️ 1. The Core Maxims of "Stone’s Rules"
Roger Stone didn't just break the unwritten rules of democracy; he wrote a new set of guidelines that treat political ethics as a liability. His entire methodology relies on three immutable maxims:
Maxim 1: "Attack, Attack, Attack – Never Defend" ⚔️: Defense is a waste of narrative momentum. If caught in a scandal, do not explain; immediately launch a more outrageous counter-attack to force the media and the opposition into a defensive, reactive posture.
Maxim 2: "Admit Nothing, Deny Everything, Launch Counter-Flak" 🛡️: Objective reality is entirely secondary to emotional impact. If a fact hurts your objective, systematically deny its existence and manufacture an alternative controversy to distract the public.
Maxim 3: "Past is Prologue" & "Nothing is True, Everything is Permitted" 🃏: Stone recognized early on that the public has a short memory. By constantly rewriting historical narratives, you can normalize behaviors that would have previously ended a political career.
📅 The Trail of Modern Political Warfare: From Watergate to Today
The trajectory of Stone's career functions as the literal evolutionary roadmap of the tactics currently deployed by the executive branch to bypass democratic accountability:
The Watergate Legacy (The 1970s) 🕵️♂️: At just 19 years old, Stone became the youngest person involved in the Watergate scandal, pioneering the use of "dirty tricks"—such as recruiting institutional spies and plants to infiltrate opposition campaigns and fracture them from within.
The Brooks Brothers Riot (The 2000 Election) 🗳️: During the historic recount in Florida, Stone masterminded the "Brooks Brothers Riot," where paid corporate operatives disguised as local protesters physically stormed a Miami-Dade election office to stop the ballot counting. This became the exact structural blueprint for modern administrative election interference.
The Invention of Fake News Infrastructure 🌐: Stone was among the first to realize that you do not need to convince the traditional mainstream press; you simply build your own alternative information pipelines. By partnering with alternative media networks and hyper-polarized digital outlets, he created the infrastructure of systemic gaslighting that laid the foundation for the current post-truth era.
🚨 2. Scaling the Spectacle: The Final Stage of Managed Politics
Today, the administration runs the Roger Stone script at a trillion-dollar scale. Political campaigns and presidential communications are no longer handled as policy debates, but as high-stakes reality television optimized for algorithmic outrage.
By treating elections as a performance rather than a civic duty, the system achieves its ultimate goal: the absolute exhaustion of the electorate. When everything is a circus, when every scandal is buried by an even larger, manufactured crisis, the public surrenders to outrage fatigue. In this state of collective disorientation, the administration can quietly rewrite constitutional rules, dismantle civil service protections, and consolidate power with zero accountability.
🎭 A Crucial Lesson in Political Theatrics
History shows that while the legal execution of power requires institutional control, the destruction of a democracy requires a master of ceremonies. Roger Stone proved that if you control the theater, you control the state. He didn't teach his disciples how to govern; he taught them how to turn the destruction of our institutions into premium content for the nightly feed. ♟️📺
🕵️♂️ The System Hacker: An AI Perspective on the Roger Stone Typology
From a political science and media-systems perspective, Roger Stone is not a traditional political strategist or an ideologue—he is the ultimate system hacker. He does not look at democratic structures as a framework to be preserved, but as an operating system full of psychological vulnerabilities to be exploited [🔍].
This specific "type" of political actor operates on three deeply calculated dimensions:
•The Weaponization of Amoralism ♟️: What makes Stone unique is his complete rejection of political ethics as a constraint. By proudly embracing the label of "dirty trickster" and engineering chaos as a primary asset, he successfully shifts the political arena from a debate over policy to a war of raw, social Darwinism. In his framework, morality is treated as a tactical liability.
The Commercialization of Outrage 📺: Stone mastered the attention economy decades before the rise of social media algorithms. He operating on the core law that in a hyper-connected world, attention is the ultimate currency, regardless of whether it is positive or negative. By transforming complex governance into a highly polarized, trash-television spectacle, he intentionally induces "outrage fatigue," stripping the public of its ability to critically analyze empirical facts.
The Post-Truth Blueprint 🌀: He functions as a living laboratory for the post-truth era. By systematically building alternative information pipelines and feeding calculated distortions into the mainstream, he helped dismantle the shared baseline of objective reality.
The Bottom Line: This typology represents the ultimate internal threat to a free society. Roger Stone proved that you do not need to overthrow a democracy with a military intervention; you can simply hollow it out from within by converting the public square into an unceasing, transactional circus where the loudest fabrication wins.
🎓 The Ultimate Educational Paradox:"Remember to always teach your children the absolute virtues of honesty, empathy, and personal responsibility—because if they work really, really hard on those traits, they might grow up just in time to become the perfect, easily manipulated, and highly compliant servants for the world that the Donalds, Rogers, and Cohns of this world are building, where the rules apply only to those foolish enough to believe in them." 🎭🏫👶
mod
A breakdown of historical references and parallels in Andor