Hello there, thank you for creating this wonderful resource! Your post about lizard people really opened my eyes, as I was not aware of it being an antisemitic trope specifically until now. I absolutely love making reptile heroes and villains alike, but I'm not Jewish myself and I’m now concerned about a dragon character I have as a main antagonist for one of my stories. Your other posts regarding this topic do point out that having one aspect of the trope does not guarantee that it will evoke the trope itself, but I'm afraid that this character has several aspects of it without me realizing prior to now, and I'm looking for advice on what to do with him.
I did not intend to make him Jewish at all, but if I were to use other ways to specifically show that he isn’t Jewish/a Jewish equivalent in this fantasy world (and I definitely will when I reach the scripting/panelling phase), I’m still concerned that even the base idea for this character will read as such regardless.
(I also apologize for the length of this ask, feel free to cut it down as needed when posting it)
Dragons, lizards, and other reptiles are not considered evil or vile in this universe, in fact there is an entire kingdom that worships a dragon god to the point where things like their clothing and architecture resemble them. Having even a fabricated appearance of a reptile (or any other animal for that matter) is encouraged and celebrated across all the kingdoms, so this isn’t meant to be a “humans vs reptiles” or “humans vs non-humans” story, even if humans are still a dominant species.
That said, this character is still an outsider to the monarchy (in fact his and the protagonist's status as non-royal is deliberate), and his appearance as a dragon man is the reason he is able to sway this particular kingdom so easily. The general populace views him as a second coming of their god, even more so than its current royalty, so I’m not sure if that makes his case better or worse here.
(I know this isn't a visual design blog necessarily but if it helps, this is the most recent design I have for him. If you have any critiques about the visuals as well then I'm all ears)
He is not motivated by greed as I thought the “dragon hoarding treasure” angle was overused already, but he does intend to overthrow and abolish the monarchy of all of the kingdoms in a “burn them to the ground” kind of way, so I’m concerned that his conquest of this and the other non-dragon kingdoms will still read poorly from the manipulation/government takeover perspective.
The protagonists that ultimately defeat him are each from different parts of this world, one of whom is the princess of the dragon kingdom and is fighting to get it back from him, though she resembles a bat more than a dragon visually (they share the same wing type). Would adding more scaly/lizard characters on the side of good help matters?
This antagonist’s own cohorts are also from various parts of this world as well (i.e. not a group of lizard people), which is intended to create a parallel between them and the group of protagonists thematically, but he’s still the leader and mastermind of his group's schemes.
So with all that in mind, do you think this concept could still be used/reworked or should it be scrapped entirely? Do you have any advice on writing lizard folk villains specifically when it comes to avoiding antisemitism? Are there questions I’m not asking myself about this particular story concept that I should be? I'm happy to clarify any further questions about the world building as needed, though admittedly there are a lot of details that need ironing out regardless. In any case, thank you for your time, I appreciate it!
Dragon antagonist trying to overthrow a kingdom
Having him be an anomaly in dragonkind, and having the good guys be more dragonlike, will help. Because then it shows that reptilian-ness, in your world, is not the reason he’s a bad guy. So yes, you’re right that adding more good lizard characters would help.
How do you feel about switching his character design with the bat princess character? Or even making her more dragonlike (without making him less so necessarily?) Just some thoughts.
I’d like to gently move you away from looking at this as “am I inadvertently checking a box that I don’t want to check?” and toward “What are the ways in which I am and am not playing into a constellation of tropes that might or might not add up to something I don’t want to say?” Dragon = reptilian = antisemitic is a decent start, and it’s good that it got your attention. Taking a deeper look will help you evaluate what’s happening with your character development.
“Lizard people,” as in the accusation of literally being reptilian, or the use of “Lizard people” as a dog whistle to imply “Jewish” without saying it, grew into significance in the 90s, but it builds on tropes that had been established in art and literature for the span of Western history. “Lizard people” works as a dog whistle because of how many of the tropes for negatively portraying Jewish characters also work for negatively portraying humanoid reptilians. So instead of simply giving the sign-off on whether “dragon-man” is a subset of “lizard person” and therefore antisemitic, let’s look at the various components of the trope and how a writer might find themselves upholding, bypassing, or directly counteracting any selection of them.
Here’s a short list of character design elements often linked with negative Jewish coding in male characters (the tropes for non-men Jewish characters can overlap with these but will also have their own components).
Note that a lot of them are only negative if the context establishes them as negative:
Skinny and nerdy, not physically strong or imposing, gaining power through trickery rather than force;
Fat and lazy, not physically strong, gaining power through financial pressure or tricky contract language;
Narrow, pointy nose and chin, close-set eyes, high forehead, black or red curly hair, olive undertones to complexion; portrayed as negative in contrast to the fair and square or rounded features portrayed on non-Jewish-coded characters;
Cowardly in a setting where physical violence is a virtue, violent toward family members or politically bloodthirsty in a setting where the virtue is pacifism, but never personally a warrior and never willing to take personal safety risks;
Never shown wearing armor or holding weapons except in 20th-21st century settings;
Elements of autistic coding including monotonous, robotic, cracking, or otherwise “unmasculine” voice;
Failure to dominate women, romantically or in his own family, but also failure to respect women who are outside of his family. Pursues women who have made it clear that they are not interested. Not a supportive or attentive partner;
Dismissive of others’ boundaries, whether sexual/romantic or just personal space;
Excels in careers that don’t require charisma, especially in math and technology fields.
Lacks loyalty to the group that includes them: that is, lacks a sense of noble patriotism in settings where patriotism is noble; lacks loyalty to the revolution or resistance movement where those are the heroes; even when an antagonist will show disloyalty to the other antagonists. This will be the case either because he values nothing above personal gain or because he has a stronger loyalty to another group or nationality than the one he is betraying.
Unpleasant, unlikeable, unappealing: even people who work for him find him repulsive and follow him because they have been manipulated out of other options or are villainous themselves.
Right off the bat, we see that some of these are contradictory. Your character--and any other character we hold up to it--might wind up upholding one of these elements specifically by intending to counteract another. Some of them are only understood as negative when placed in a context that specifically extolls a different virtue. Historically, Jews have been a handy all-purpose antagonist: to capitalists, Jews are communist, to communists Jews are capitalists. To radical Leftists Jews are faking being marginalized and to racists Jews are faking whiteness. In the face of this, a checklist attempting to encode tropes to avoid would quickly become too sprawling and unwieldy to use. Since “vibes” are hard to convey in text, though, let’s do our best to figure out what applies here.
Your character is an antagonist who gains power through trickery, by using his draconic appearance to gain the trust of a people who revere dragons. He’s also red-toned, armored, and motivated by something other than greed, characteristics which generally run counter to negative Jewish coding. You have a two-sided task: to make it clear that he isn’t intended as a dog whistle, and to avoid implying that the actions he takes that make him an antagonist are inherently results of his Jewish-coded aspects.
What are his other attributes?
Do people follow him because he offers them kindness or because he tricks them into contracts or maneuvers them out of options?
Does he respect and listen to his allies? Is he loyal to them?
Does your story frame his motives as noble even if his methods are misguided?
What would it take to get him to sell out his allies?
Would he do it for money? To save their lives?
Is he heroic on the battlefield, a formidable foe, or does he send others to take risks he wouldn’t take?
Does he have romantic relationships? If so, how does he treat his partners?
Is he loyal to a long-term spouse? Is he predatory and coercive?
Does he have genuine friendships and loving familial relationships, or only yes-men?
I’m not saying that your bad guy has to be a good person; rather these are some openers to considering what the coding of villainy consists of, and how one codes for evil without employing antisemitic coding as a handy shorthand.