#section 8

[gordiicore]

[chernobog13]

ATTENTION JAMES GUNN:

Section 8 is the greatest superhero team in all of the DC Universe and deserves their own series, just like Peacemaker got. Or maybe an animated series, like Creature Commandos.

Either way, make it happen NOW!

For those who are unfamiliar with these stalwart champions (shame on you!), they were introduced in the always entertaining, uproariously hilarious series Hitman from writer Garth Ennis and artist John McCrea.

Section 8's original members are (from left-to right above): Shakes, Jean de Baton-Baton, Dog Welder, Friendly Fire, The Defenestrator, Sixpack, Flemgem, and (in the shadows) Bueno Excellente.

[justinspoliticalcorner]

The war on poor kids

Late Friday afternoon, the Trump administration released the details of its 2026 budget request. The 1,223-page document proposes slashing a

Judd Legum at Popular Information:

Late Friday afternoon, the Trump administration released the details of its 2026 budget request. The 1,223-page document proposes slashing around $163 billion in non-defense spending. That isn't nearly enough to offset the trillions in tax cuts the administration is simultaneously seeking in the reconciliation bill. But the spending cuts would have severe consequences for the most vulnerable Americans, especially poor children. For example, the Trump administration is reducing funding that helps pregnant women, children, and breastfeeding mothers who are nutritionally at risk afford fruits and vegetables. Approximately 6.7 million people currently benefit from the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC), including 1.5 million pregnant and post-partum mothers, 1.5 million infants, and 3.7 million children under the age of five. To qualify, a beneficiary must live in a household with an income at or below 185% of the federal poverty line and be deemed nutritionally at risk by a healthcare professional or other expert.

Research has shown that the program reduces healthcare costs, leads to improved academic achievement, and results in "fewer infant deaths, premature births, and low birthweight infants." The current fruit and vegetable benefit is modest, and only covers about half of the cost of the recommended daily servings of fruit and vegetables for mothers and young children. Nevertheless, the Trump budget would cut the monthly benefit for fruits and vegetables for pregnant mothers from $54 to $13. Young children living in poor families would see their monthly fruit and vegetable benefit reduced from $27 to $10. The administration's budget document provides no justification for these cuts. Trump has justified other reductions in social safety net programs as a way to encourage beneficiaries to work or eliminate waste and fraud. But this cut impacts millions of infants and children under five. Previously, WIC has enjoyed bipartisan support. In the 50 years since the program was started, its funding has never been reduced.

[...]

Kicking kids out of their homes

One of the deepest cuts in the Trump budget targets the rental assistance programs administered by the Department of Housing and Urban Development, including Housing Choice Vouchers and Section 8 assistance. The Trump budget cuts these programs by $26.72 billion, which is a 42% reduction. There are currently 10.1 million people who rely on these programs to keep a roof over their heads. Of that total, 5.6 million beneficiaries are in families with children. (Most of the rest are seniors or people with disabilities.)

The drastic cuts mean that millions of families with children will no longer be able to afford a place to live. The reason why many families cannot afford housing without federal assistance is not due to a lack of employment. "60% of non-disabled, working-age American households receiving Department of Housing and Urban Development rental assistance include at least one worker," according to the Center for Budget and Policy Priorities. The problem is that since 2001, median rent has increased by 23%, but the median income of a renter household has increased by just 5%. These households do not benefit from the two largest federal housing subsidies — the mortgage interest deduction and the capital gains exemption for the sale of a principal residence.

[...]

Taking an ax to pre-K

Preschool Development Grants is a federal program that helps states improve their early-childhood educational systems for children up to age five. States compete for a portion of the grant funding available — $315 million in fiscal year 2024. The money is used to help states offer "high-quality early education to more working families." The funding "helps millions of children have access to safe, quality child care and early learning that can help set them on a strong path for their futures." States use the money for various purposes. Kansas, for example, used some funding "to identify and reduce regulatory burdens associated with operating state child care businesses." Maryland provided training to early education providers to "improve quality among programs for infants and toddlers as well as preschool-age children." Ohio's grant funded "partnerships between early childhood providers and businesses to increase wages and improve recruitment and retention."

The Trump Regime’s FY 2026 budget request includes items that would harm poor children, such as cuts to WIC and housing assistance.

[indefiniteavatar]

hey poor as hell people who need an apartment, section 8, waiting list is open for the next few days. Here’s the link even if you don’t need it, please signal boost. They are not making nearly enough people aware about this shit.

on.nyc.gov/section8-application

http://on.nyc.gov/section8-application

[globalriseofblackpeople]

[muzzleguppy]

more dogwelder, unfortunately.

[psychotic-tbh]

I think section 8 and disability income sources (and welfare in general) shouldn’t be so stigmatized.

They help people. They help the poor in difficult circumstances. They help the disabled. They help the elderly.

When folks associate/describe everyone who uses these as necessary options as those who don’t need them in order to survive on the most basic level and are being “‘lazy’”, they’re inadvertently creating shame in those who do need them to survive.

You never know why someone is using welfare, even if they’re in a “good” spot. Don’t assume, especially if you don’t have all the information. And especially don’t say things like “everyone who uses welfare who isn’t xyz is abusing the system.”