#selectivity

[odiabonecessario]

Part of what made me feel a lot better was when I understood that what attracts women isn't inherently good or perfect

[omegaphilosophia]

Exploring the Notion: Why a Heaven Might Not Be Ideal

Throughout human history, the concept of a heavenly afterlife has been embraced by various religious and cultural traditions. However, upon closer examination, one may find that the idea of a heaven, as traditionally envisioned, presents certain philosophical and practical challenges. In this thought-provoking blog post, we will explore some compelling reasons why the existence of a heaven, contrary to common belief, may not be as desirable as it initially appears.

Stagnation of Personal Growth: The notion of an eternal paradise, where all desires are fulfilled and suffering is absent, raises concerns about the stagnation of personal growth and development. Human existence is marked by challenges, struggles, and the pursuit of improvement. The absence of adversity and the constant fulfillment of desires might hinder the drive for personal growth, the acquisition of knowledge, and the pursuit of new experiences. It is through overcoming obstacles that we often find meaning and purpose in life.

Loss of Free Will: A fundamental aspect of many conceptions of heaven is the absence of pain, suffering, and moral dilemmas. However, this raises questions about the preservation of free will and individual autonomy. If heaven is a place where everything is predetermined or where individuals are stripped of their ability to make choices, it might lead to a loss of personal agency and genuine human experiences. The freedom to make choices, learn from mistakes, and navigate moral complexities is essential for personal growth and the development of moral character.

The Problem of Selectivity: The concept of heaven often raises concerns about fairness and selectivity. If a heavenly existence is granted only to a chosen few, based on certain criteria or religious affiliations, it can give rise to feelings of exclusion, inequality, and arbitrary judgment. The idea of eternal bliss for some and eternal damnation for others contradicts principles of fairness, justice, and compassion. A heaven that perpetuates divisions and exclusivity may not align with our moral intuitions and desires for a just and inclusive world.

The End of Existential Meaning: The concept of heaven as an eternal paradise can potentially undermine the inherent value and meaning of our finite earthly existence. The recognition of life's impermanence and the limitations it imposes often drives individuals to seek purpose, personal growth, and meaningful connections. The notion of an eternal afterlife might diminish the significance of our earthly pursuits, relationships, and accomplishments, leading to a devaluation of the present moment and the experiences that shape our character.

Compatibility with Human Flourishing: The human experience encompasses a wide range of emotions, challenges, and opportunities for growth. Happiness and fulfillment often arise from overcoming obstacles, forming meaningful connections, and pursuing personal and collective goals. If a heaven were to remove these essential aspects of the human experience, it might hinder our capacity for authentic joy, empathy, and personal fulfillment. The complexities and diversity of human existence contribute to our ability to appreciate and value the full spectrum of human emotions and experiences.

While the concept of a heavenly afterlife holds allure and comfort for many, a closer examination reveals potential philosophical and practical challenges. The notion of an eternal paradise raises concerns about personal growth, free will, fairness, existential meaning, and the compatibility with human flourishing. Engaging with these thought-provoking considerations invites us to contemplate the importance of the human condition, our capacity for growth and development, and the significance of our experiences in shaping our lives. It is through our engagement with life's challenges and uncertainties that we may find the true richness and fulfillment that come from embracing our shared human journey.

[roleplayerconfessions]

🌴 The reason I don’t list my sexual orientation on my blog is because it’s none of your goddamn business, not because I’m “probably a heterosexual homophobe”. What in the actual fuck does MY orientation as a mun have to do with my portrayals? Three of them are bisexual, one is heterosexual, and forgive me for being picky about my wlw ships because of the insane levels of fetishization and/or pushiness for ships to the level of being creeped out in the past by other muns that I’ve experienced every time I’ve been interested in a wlw ship. Selectivity is not homophobic.

And further for the record: I’m a gray-ace (sex-positive) who’s yet to come out openly and is still figuring out exactly where I fall sexually and romantically. That’s also why it’s none of your fucking business. The fact that the lgbtq+ community treats me like I’m somehow homophobic because I don’t feel comfortable yet being open and honest about my sexuality is just… so disheartening, and makes it so much harder for me to feel comfortable ever talking about my struggles.

[confessionsofa-roleplayer]

I feel like sometimes selective blogs need to make it clear how they're selective. Simply saying you're selective is not really good? It can mean a many a thing. Are you selective due to limited time? Are you selective due to writing style? Are you selective due to conflicting muses? I don't deny your right to be selective, but how is it fair to yourself or other people if you don't explain how you are selective?

[0samjha]

[studyandprocrastinate]

I’m in love with page markers/pos-its❤️

[senribirarantomarco-blog]