
seen from Singapore
seen from Pakistan
seen from Germany

seen from Azerbaijan

seen from Canada

seen from T1

seen from Greece

seen from Singapore
seen from United States

seen from Greece
seen from India

seen from Malaysia
seen from China

seen from Greece
seen from United States

seen from Germany
seen from Greece
seen from Türkiye

seen from Canada

seen from Kyrgyzstan
When today’s post-Marxists write treatises where they ponder endlessly on what to do, on who might be the agent of radical change, their desperate doubt and search effectively bears witness to the waning of their desire to really embark on a radical change: they don’t really desire change, they rather enjoy the endless self-critical pondering which, as they know well, will not lead to any clear result.
Surplus Enjoyment S. Zizek
I don’t mean to imply that since no political decision or project can ever be fully justified by or grounded in what precedes it (or in its circumstances) we might as well stop complaining about it and pointing at dirty conditions behind it. Or that it doesn’t really matter what we do (politically), since whatever we do, this gap will always be there and all political decision will ultimately always be decisions of Power. On the contrary, it is precisely because of this that it matters very much what we do.
Alenko Zupancic, “When Surplus Enjoyment Meets Surplus Value” in Reflections on Seminar XVII, 177. (emphasis my own)
Repetition bears a certain relationship to what is the limit of this knowledge, and which we call jouissance.
Lacan, The Other Side of Psychoanalysis
"The greatest threat to pleasure is not a scarcity that prevents full access to it, but the excess of pleasure itself."
Žižek