#thinking caps on

[noctisangui]

conditioning 🙅‍♂️🙅‍♂️

her favorite kinks 🙅‍♂️🙅‍♂️🙅‍♂️

conditioning her with her favorite kinks 🙅‍♂️🙅‍♂️🙅‍♂️

conditioning her with my favorite kinks🙂‍↕️😵‍💫🙂‍↕️

nah but deadass…. followers who are into cnc & hypnosis? its idea time ;p cause hear me out, right?

cnc is very versatile. there’s a lot of different unique ways to use it.

one of which…. could be….. well. you know.

after all, the subs who look so pretty doing exactly as they’re told, getting off on it…. they would probably love to please you even more, no? and what’s more devotion than not just forcing yourself to do something you don’t usually do, but training yourself. training yourself to associate pleasure with something you’re not into, to bring a new kink solely for their pleasure….

i mean. that would be crazy, right?

[aethercoreheart]

had a thought during work and wanted to share it :p but thought of current timeline mc (us ??) randomly waking up one day as an mc from one of the myths (*especially* from any of the og trios new myths) and just thinking of how each li would react especially seeing as the trend is mc dying in the li’s arms in their myths

OOOOOF.... hmm i think KOD died right after mc though right.... would this apply to him??

wait this could be a concept for a banner though... like mc getting isekai'd into a myth because of a deepspace fluctuation or whatever.. like she's in her current body but what if she adopts her memories from the myth's version of her??? like she knows she died tragically in that timeline and she has to find a way back to her own world... but the li's see her, they have a feeling that she's not their mc (if that makes sense) but they can't bear to lose her again so they do all that they can to keep her in their world.. but she knows she needs their powers/abilities to somehow make it back home

[doomed2repeat]

The people complaining that influencers who got to tour the Bridgerton set had to sign NDA’s and aren’t real fans of the show….

That is the point.

They made them sign NDA’s so they can have behind the scenes content that will be ready when it’s time to actually promote the season in a media blitz. Same thing happened last season. They can’t wait and film on set content later, it has to be done now, but it’s also way too early to blanket the internet with it or people will move on. It’s called an embargo and it’s fairly common.

They’re not targeting super fan content creators because who are those people going to influence to watch? Their fans already watch the show and are obsessed with it! They’re trying to influence new audiences to watch, to grow the audience. If they keep targeting the same people, they’ll only reach the same people.

It’s not that deep! It’s good promo! And you’ll get it when they’re ready!!!

[b99fandomevents]

You guys do AMAZING work and I'm so sad this might be the last event 😢 Let's all make it a great one!

Thank you 🥺 and we agree - let’s all put on our matching leather jackets, sit on cool bean bag chairs and find our blaze of glory! ❤️‍🔥

[daughterboy]

this comment on the new txt mv teaser is killing me bc like. where do you think they got the footage for the teaser. of course it’s high quality it’s a short clip of the same video 😭😭

[queen-astraea]

How unoriginal. There’s only one of me. Try again…

[shadowspellchecker]

Resources and Notes on Minors and the House of Lords -- or Netflix better get crackin' on it's worldbuilding

Lords and the manner of their introduction

2 Lords not to sit in Parliament before twenty-one [22 May 1685]

No Lord under the age of one and twenty years shall be permitted to sit in the House.

3 Peers by descent not to be introduced [27 July 1663]

Peers summoned by writ by virtue of their descent, being of the age of one and twenty years, may sit in the House without any introduction, and no such peers shall be introduced by any herald or with any ceremony.

4 No fee to be paid on introduction [27 July 1663]

No peer shall pay any fee to any herald upon their first coming or introduction into the House.

5 Difference in form or style of writs [27 March 1621]

If there be any difference in the form or style of the writs from the ancient, it is to be examined how it came to pass.

6 Bishops Lords of Parliament to be introduced [27 March 1621]

Bishops to whom a writ of summons has been issued are not peers but are Lords of Parliament, and shall be introduced on first receiving a writ and also on translation to another See.

7 Lords’ higher titles to be used [1 June 1954]

When any Lord who has a higher title or dignity than that by which they sit in Parliament shall be named in any record of the proceedings of the House, or of any committee thereof, the said higher title alone shall be used, but when such a Lord takes the oath of allegiance the title or dignity by which they sit in Parliament shall be added in brackets after such higher title or dignity.

8 Precedency [10 April 1628]

Every peer, upon new creation, shall have place according to their degree and the date of their Letters Patent, and every peer shall hold their place according to their ancienty in their degree, unless it be in case of such persons as are particularly mentioned in any Act of Parliament.

No explanation for WHY it was only in 1685 that they added it to Standing Orders found so far, so here's some alternative context:

https://www.jstor.org/stable/3817236

THE POLITICAL CAREER OF CHARLES SPENCER, THIRD ...

He was active in Essex and its boroughs, and in 1685 also in Cambridge University and Hertfordshire. As lord lieutenant of Devonshire he did not distinguish himself in the campaign against Monmouth, and on 31 July he threw up all his employments out of jealousy of Lord Feversham and John Churchill II.

By this point, he would have been in the House of Lords. Perhaps the memory of what an early entry into politics could do weighed on their minds? But Monck was an extreme case.

The youngest MP since…?

Following the election of Mhairi Black last week, many of you have asked us about young MPs! Over to our Director, Dr Paul Seaward… Many hav

This also regards the House of Commons...

But he is the youngest MP we know about, rather than the only one under 21. In fact, it’s already been pointed out that several rather high profile MPs in the eighteenth century were elected well under the legal age of majority, at 21, including Charles James Fox, elected for Midhurst at a mere 19.

As Andrew Thrush’s introductory survey to our 1604-29 volumes shows, though it was assumed to be against the custom of Parliament, it was common in the sixteenth and early seventeenth century for young men under, sometimes well under, the age of 21 to be elected, a practice regarded with irritation by some older members, but vaguely amused tolerance by plenty more. Under-age members included, for example, 15 year olds like Lord Wriothesley and Sir Montagu Bertie; even Sir Francis Bacon boasted that he was an MP at the age of 17.

By the late seventeenth century (and perhaps spurred on by the example of Christopher Monck) it seems to have become a bit less acceptable: there was a debate on the subject in 1678 occasioned by the presence in the House of two relations of the Earl of Danby aged 17 and 18 and in 1685 a motion to expel two teenagers was effectively suppressed. One MP referred to the fact that the issue had ‘ever been industriously avoided’. The case of Monck produced a bizarre anomaly when he succeeded to his father’s title, Duke of Albemarle in 1670, when he was still under 21 and barred from taking his seat in the House of Lords because of his age. No-one could quite work out whether the seat was, as a result, vacant or not.

That is strange. It wasn't against standing orders at the time... so what prevented him?

Also discusses education of members.

The Manuscripts of the House of Lords

A Constitutional History of the House of Lords, from Original Sources

[nolongertwo]

The concept was pure, simple, true, it inspired me, led a rebellious fire, but ultimately I learned the lesson that Goldman, Prudot and the others learned. That true freedom requires sacrifice and pain. Most human beings only think they want freedom. In truth they yearn for the bondage of social order, rigid laws, materialism. The only freedom man really wants is the freedom to become comfortable.