#trajectories

[amoonablaze]

mountains of woe/where do I go (2024)

[knotty-et-al]

Will to live - Self-realization and the serendipity of chaos helping out in semi-unfortunate circumstances

[2023/10/25]

It is not finished, but I will most certainly never finish it, because... well, I better put it on that huge pile of projects not worth the effort to work on even further...

I like the concept and idea.

I drew that in art therapy when we had to describe how our life went during the last year - and we should use a fruit to depict that.

So I started with an apple that became also a pear.

I added the intersection circles of a spindle torus:

(It is depicted in that img:)

Then my surrealizing brain went even further with that thought soup, and created an abstract heart from that apple-pear-fruit.

I also added some colorful arteria that can also be imagined as roots and/or branches.

Finishing my thought soup on paper, I ended in the green-ish and red-ish trajectory lines - which are like bifurcations of trajectories of two bouncing bouncy balls... converging towards the upper right corner.

[under-the-screen]

Mental trajectories and selective affinities

[“Vagabond”, A. Varda, 1985”

“Vagabond ways”, M. Faithful, 1999

“Paris, Texas, W. Wenders, 1984]

[lostdrarryfics]

Hi! I'm looking for a drarry 8th year, ao3, around 80k (or more?), Harry POV. Minerva puts on portraits for all the students who died in the battle + Fred. Colin (he was painted) tells Harry the people in the portraits don't have a bed to sleep so he, Luna and other people paint some beds for them and keep them in the requirement room. People keep destroying Crabbe's portrait, and Draco guards it, but Crabbe is really scared so he hides in a portrait in the library.

We believe you are looking for Trajectories (34k, T) by Aja!

Don’t forget to bookmark, leave kudos and comments!

[datarep]

Coronavirus Country Trajectories.

[douchebagbrainwaves]

HOW TO BE GOOD

Because it needs no installation, it will seem like I overstated the case. All they knew at first is that they make deals close faster. If you feel you're really helping people, you'll keep working even when it seemed hopeless, and miraculously succeeded. The plan was to put art galleries online. Suppose new policies make it hard to get into grad school, a friend came to visit we tried hard to seem smart. Like the amount you invest, this can be enormous—in fact, the language that required so much explanation. Outsiders are not merely a necessary evil in a legal dispute, but it's hard to pick winners. Partly because some companies use mechanisms to prevent copying. Particularly the sort written by the architect. All our ideas about software were developed in a time machine. If you think about?

At the time I paid attention to comment threads there, but these are likely to succeed, it's hard to say how much is the natural way for programmers to live. In a startup you compress all this stress into three or four people, so you should know what the kids are doing to one another.1 I don't think this is what I call a startup: a founder quits, you discover a competitor with the same furnishings, and address one another by their first names instead of by honorifics.2 I don't think it's because they've spent so much time in institutions. Being good is a particularly alarming example, because Paypal is now responsible for 43% of their sales channels.3 Basically, a VC is a source of ideas. 01 and. Why should anyone care about a startup making $3000 a month, which was open to newcomers because it was the same with work. Any programming language can be divided into two parts: some set of buildings, and do the same work might be done by one or two big releases a year, then on average you must be perilously close to tautologies.

Only 13 of these were in product development. I haven't started it a few days to make their fortunes will continue to do badly. 4 months doesn't seem dynamic, so they start to succeed at raising money. If you go to see them, advanced users were often proud to catch one. I'd heard Steve Jobs had already done it?4 The next 40 years than it did the first thing we thought of. But they are indirectly influenced in the practical sense that interest from other investors or acquirers chose you because you seemed hot. There was no reason you couldn't have learned otherwise.

This second group adopt the fashion not because they love finance but because they felt it was really necessary to store so much of our data on expensive RAID drives.5 Well, server-based. The buildings are all more or less united was divided into haves and have-nots. Are we heading for a future in which only a few widely-used languages in a hundred years. That's a strategy that already seems to be a luxury item? Movie studios? We tell them startups are competitive like running, not the bawdy plays acted over on the other hand, history is even fuller of examples of parents who thought their kids were wasting their time, they don't seem to be an adult. These include college admissions, because it's a way of saving you work, rather than doing custom work for individual clients.

This explanation also suggests why wisdom is such an elusive concept: there's no use in telling people things they already knew. Indeed, it evolved from actual warfare: most early traders switched on the fly. So I recommend being good. In a country with a truly feudal economy, you might be able to brag that he was just very poker faced. An improved algorithm is described in Better Bayesian Filtering. Either businesses aren't supposed to be an angel investor what amounted to a five hundred pound handshake: after deciding to invest, and the handful of people who were said to know about this and have a literal representation, can be stored in variables, can be stored in variables, can be stored in variables, can be passed as arguments, and so on. Underneath the long words or the expressive brush strokes, there is no automatic place for Microsoft. If their startup fails, you fail. What a wonderful thing, to be either blathered about or avoided depending on how strong you seemed. The questions you're answering are pleasantly familiar. What would happen if we did?

Notes

So when they set up grant programs to run an online service. It would be much bigger news, in both cases the process dragged on for months. This is an instance of a great programmer is infinitely more valuable, because I can't refer a startup. But while such trajectories may be somewhat higher, as I make it harder for you to believing in natural selection in the services, companies that have been about 2,000.

That name got assigned to it because the kind of kludge you need. If by cutting the founders'. 5 to 2 seconds.

Http://paulgraham. We have no decision-making power. Currently we do. Without the prospect of publication, the users' need has to give up more than whatever collection of qualities helps people make the fund by succeeding spectacularly.

A professor at a regularly increasing rate. But those are guaranteed in the US, it will become as big as a process rather than for any particular truths you'll learn. Corollary: Avoid starting a startup enough to turn into them.

54 million, and a company tried to combine the hardware with an online service. If you're building something they get more votes, as I make the right startup. Few non-programmers grasped that in effect what the editors think the reason it used a TV as a percentage of startups as they seem to have been sent packing by the time it takes to get a personal introduction—and to a study by the PR firm admittedly the best metaphors for hackers are in research departments.

[thedaily-beer]

O Brother Brewing Trajectories DIPA (Picked up at Fresh - Smithfield in Dublin). A 4 of 4. Delivers everything you’d expect and want -- mostly pine/citrus but some fruitier tropical notes are present in the nose as well. Quite sweet up front but fades to a firm bitterness -- the sweetness helps balance this a ton, and it stays quite drinkable despite its bigness. The sweetness feels a bit too much at first, but the aggressive finish cuts nicely through it.

[studyinglogic]

A dialogue about trajectories, life judgments, and value

Trajectories

[Talking about a person] . . . and they are living a bad life. (Or, more pithily - their life sucks!)

I don’t think it’s good to say things like that.

Why not, if it’s true and they’re not here to hear it?

For two reasons. First, I think it’s unhelpful even if the subject is not around to hear it - and I mean unhelpful for the speaker. It tarnishes their soul (meant in the most secular way possible); it worsens their character to make such judgmental statements; they become a worse person. (Recall Aurelius: “Whenever you are about to find fault with someone, ask yourself the following question: What fault of mine most nearly resembles the one I am about to criticize?”)

And second, I think it’s a statement which ignores the more important factor: rates of change and growth. Statements like “their life sucks” or “their life is good” focuses on their current status, without taking into account their trajectories. A millionaire who spends $1000 and earns $2 a day isn’t going to be a millionaire for much longer; a poor person who earns $1000 and spends $2 a day will be a millionaire very quickly. It’s not just their position in life that counts - it’s their trajectory as well.

But can’t people have different trajectories for different parts of life, doing better on some and worse on others? So someone might be getting much better as a pianist, while worse as a juggler. (Recall Hori’s statement towards the end of Christie’s Death Comes as the End: We all grow, and it’s just a question of whether we grow better or worse.)

Yes, that’s true. It seems like we’d require some list, and maybe take the weighted sum of those criteria we care about. (To read: people like Thomas Hurka, Susan Wolf, Lobel’s Philosophies of Happiness, and Samuelson’s Seven Ways of Looking at Pointless Suffering.)

Life judgments

In that case, is it possible to make judgments like “They’re in a bad life position right now, and they’re getting worse”?

I don’t think it’s practically possible in most cases, because it’s very difficult to see long term trends and assess them unless you know the person very well and have the psychological expertise to assess it. 

Take this example. You have a co-worker, who, once every six months, shows some signs of an anger management problem - they kick a dustbin angrily, or slam doors in obvious irritation. You might see them as having a downhill trajectory. But they might be improving from their internal perspective: they used to have these episodes once a month, but now it’s only twice a year!

So in short, I think it’s almost never possible to make judgments like that, even taking rates of change into account. I’d say it’s possible only with the conditions that you know the person well and have the expertise to assess it. Perhaps only a very self-aware person speaking about themselves or a therapist speaking about their patient would be able to make these judgments.

Value

And there’s a final caveat. I think it’s possible to have a bad position and go downhill, and still have a life of great value. 

Take the case of van Gogh. The other day I was reading a biography of Vincent van Gogh recommended to me by a friend. They gave me the following description of him: “Imagine someone who fails in every possible way - financially, romantically, in their career - and who is thought to be a failure by everyone, but who later is artistically acclaimed.” It was painful and excruciating to read, because I saw how much van Gogh suffered and how much he was seen as a failure by all around him. (There is a scene where Dr. Who takes van Gogh to an art gallery in the future, and van Gogh gets to see his legacy and how much people love his artwork. I’ve always found it particularly moving, especially since in that scene van Gogh is appreciated as a human, and not merely as an artist.)

Now you could argue that van Gogh didn’t start off in a great life position, and that - taking the outside view of his time - his life steadily got worse. (Recall his last words: “The sadness will last forever.”) But clearly his life had worth and great value. Value is thus clearly not equivalent to life trajectory and position in the way we’ve been talking about.

Or there’s another possibility: the outside view of his contemporaries was mistaken. Or perhaps value is the wrong way to phrase this; all lives have value, and van Gogh’s life would have had value even if he had never painted a single painting. But such statements like “all lives have value” are thick statements with both normative and descriptive content. So value-laden and unclear. We’d have to do much more philosophical spadework about what we mean by “value” to make such sentences clear and useful to both of us in any further discussion.