So Missouri is introducing a bill that would make it so teachers would be charged as sex offenders and put on the registry for "contributing to social transition" of trans youth.
This is so completely fucked up. A teacher can be charged with a class E felony for using they/them pronouns.
They’re making aiding trans people punishable by law. They’re making it illegal to help trans people. They want to make it impossible to support us. They want to cut us off from all resources in society. They want to starve us out.
You can read the whole bill here: https://documents.house.mo.gov/billtracking/bills241/hlrbillspdf/5874H.01I.pdf
🚨 My article finally came out in the McGill Law Journal, volume 69. It has been angering right-wing pundits since it was accepted, so you know it’s juicy!
In the article, which is full of sex jokes, I flesh out genderfucking as a legal methodology that emphasizes the messiness of gender life.
Writing the paper with quite possibly the most sex jokes in legal history for volume 69 was… noice.
Genderfucking as a Critical Legal Methodology - McGill Law Journal
New law started applying today in Sweden! Anyone can now have their legal gender changed... with a certificate written by a licensed medical professional, but by joves that is a much simpler process than before.
A TIM couldn't accept that his wife was not going to go along with his delusion and turned to the family annihilator route, a route associated with violent narcissistic men.
A man in Spain is alleged to have poisoned his wife and child in the midst of divorce proceedings following his declaration of a transgender
By Nuria Muíña García July 11, 2024
A man in Spain is alleged to have poisoned his wife and child in the midst of divorce proceedings following his declaration of a transgender identity. The court has now imposed a restraining order on the man, who has not been named, while the police investigation is ongoing.
According to Diario de Sevilla, the couple were engaged in divorce proceedings but were still sharing a home in Dos Hermanas when the suspected poisoning took place. While it has not been definitively confirmed, the motive for the divorce appears to have been the man’s decision to identify as a “woman.”
Shortly after choosing to split, the woman, whose identity has also been kept anonymous, began experiencing severe and sudden-onset stomach pain. She sought medical care and was told she was exhibiting symptoms of chemical consumption. Police quickly became involved, and an investigation was launched into what was then identified as a suspected poisoning.
Disturbingly, the couple’s 5-year-old son may have also been the victim of an attempted poisoning by his father. Medical tests are being conducted in order to verify whether he had been targeted as well.
Prosecutors speculated that the woman was poisoned by her husband using household pool care products that were mixed into her food. In response to the hypothesis, the court issued a warrant of entry to the couple’s home to gather evidence.
Yesterday, a Dos Hermanas court responsible for prosecuting violence against women heard statements from both the husband and wife, after which it decided to place a restraining order on the man. He is now required to stay 300 meters away from his wife, and has been denied contact to his son.
At the time of this writing, no arrests have been made, but police investigations are ongoing.
The case has sparked particular concern amongst Spanish women’s rights advocates, as they have noted that Spain’s exceptionally strict gender identity laws mean that, if prosecuted, the man will be treated as a “female” by the courts.
Further, crimes marked as “gender-based violence” in Spain result in female victims being provided with specific legal protections and resources to assist them in the aftermath of the crime. These resources may include assistance with divorce proceedings, child custody, and housing arrangements.
If the man’s legal gender marker change was completed before the poisoning took place, it would mean that the victim would have no access to these resources because her aggressor was a “woman.”
“Gender-based violence” is also considered an aggravating factor in violent crimes, and may result in a harsher sentencing.
The situation has lead some women’s rights advocates to speculate that the man had planned to murder his wife, but that he had changed his legal gender marker just before doing so to avoid “gender-based violence” being used as an aggravating factor in the event he was caught.
If the man is prosecuted, this would not be the first time in Spain that a male accused of domestic violence against his female partner was prosecuted as a “woman.”
As previously reported by Reduxx, a man in Catalonia who beat his female partner for opposing his transition avoided charges of gender-based violence by legally changing his identification to “female” and adopting a woman’s name just prior to being prosecuted.
The couple, who were in their 60s, had been together for 11 years, but after the man began expressing an interest in crossdressing, the woman asked to break off their intimate relationship. He became violent towards her, and began sexually and physically abusing her in retaliation for her refusal to participate in his fetish.
After seeking help with the police, the woman discovered he had already changed his legal sex marker, and thus she would not be provided any protections for female victims of male crime.
At the time, Reduxx spoke with Núria González López, the legal advisor for the victim, who explained that “the abuser’s change of his legal sex means that, in the eyes of the law, the female in the situation is not at risk. This means the victim has fewer rights.”
In February of 2023, the Spanish government enacted what is colloquially known as the “Trans Law,” which instituted a “no questions asked” policy for those who declared they were transgender. The law also made it significantly easier for individuals to change their name and legal sex, hastening the process for applicants and removing any medical requirements.
Since the institution of the law, Spain has seen concerns right about the rise in “trans fraud,” in which males change their legal sex marker simply to gain legal or professional benefits.
In Ceuta, an extremely small Spanish autonomous city located in the North African coast, 37 male civil servants are known to have changed their registered sex in order to obtain benefits assigned to women.
Most of the men are members of the Army, the National Police, the Civil Guard, or the Local Police of the city. The men all share a pattern in that they change their legal sex marker while keeping their “male” name.
Experts explain what leads these killers to do the unimaginable.
"The term “biological sex” had appeared infrequently in biomedical research prior to the 2010s, but its usage increased over the course of that decade. In 2016, it appeared in a much-discussed North Carolina law excluding transgender people from restrooms consistent with their gender identities. Around that time, similar legislation was proposed in many other states and localities, offering various definitions of “biological sex” based on criteria such as reproductive organs or genetics. These varying legal definitions reflect the fact that there is no agreed upon definition of “biological male” or “biological female” in the sciences.
These trends have continued with laws enacted beginning in 2020. Eighteen states have invoked “biological sex” in new laws barring transgender girls and women from girls’ and women’s sports. Because it is impossible to devise and apply any all-purpose medical definition, most of these laws either neglect to define “biological sex” or provide that “biological sex” is to be determined not based on any aspect of biology, but rather, based on the original birth certificate. States have also invoked “biological sex” in their new laws banning certain forms of gender-affirming health care for transgender youth, limiting restroom access for transgender students, and restricting changes to sex designations on identification documents. Some state legislatures have even come up with different definitions of biological sex in the very same session."
Clarke, Jessica A. (November 2022) "Sex Assigned at Birth" Columbia Law Review Vol. 122, No. 7., pages 1846-1849.
(emphasis mine)
"the system wants trans mascs to submit (detransition), and it wants TMA people to not exist (die)"
If they want transmascs to submit, what do you think they're submitting to? Submission to the violence of forced detransition. They want us to stop fighting the cistem, to stop being trans.
What happens if all the trans men and mascs are forced to detransition? You mean, trans mascs wouldn't exist then?
What do you think happens to trans men who are forced into being women? They often die.
They don't want trans men to exist either, stop pretending forced detransition or erasure isn't murder or wanting us to exist
