In regards to this post/ask: https://www.tumblr.com/theseventhstrangersystem/802433961330622465/its-not-really-fair-or-accurate-to-call-your?source=share
You ... haven't been educating at all. Most of your content is trying to disprove endogenic plurality which has nothing to do with CDDs. It's not "guy makes one mistake", you've become pretty infamous in syscourse for not keeping up with the sources people give you NOR providing *your own* sources. So why even say you educate about CDDs when you haven't actually been doing that?
"Most of your content is trying to disprove endogenic plurality which has nothing to do with CDDs" I fear it has everything to do with CDDs because pro/neu/endogenics are directly ableist towards people with CDDs and spread extremely harmful misinformation about CDDs.
"You've become pretty infamous in syscourse for not keeping up with the sources people give you NOR providing *your own* sources." Are you covering your eyes and plugging your ears? We read every source pro/neu/endos cite to us, which it's funny they cite those sources considering none of them prove endogenic multiplicity in the slightest— it's always just "they (endogenics) maybe might exist. More research has to be done, but it isn't looking good for them." We just don't always respond because either we don't have the energy, are busy, forgot because we literally have DID + ADHD, or don't see the point in arguing because the opposition's argument makes no sense— they clearly have no idea what they're talking about. As for ourselves: we definitely do cite all of our own sources, I really don't know what you're talking about. Sometimes we may leave a source out if it's something easily google-able, but its uncommon that we do that.
Also, we don't ONLY post educational content. Our bio says we post educational and general CDD content. Frankly, we could post whatever the hell we want, because it's our blog... but we do post educational content like every other day, so I really don't know what you're talking about.