agree or disagree, I just need people to understand why Anders did what he did. especially now that I’ve played through the game, begging the chantry to do anything but sit with their thumbs up their ass when they could be stepping in to do literally anything. he couldn’t have targeted the gallows without directly targeting the mages as well, and while his actions are short sighted with his drive for vengeance above justice, it was still done with a desperation to stop the injustice mages face. and the templars are so associated with the chantry, despite how that order of authority had sort of swapped in Kirkwall.
“Anders thought he was wrong, he can’t be right,” “Anders fought injustice, he can’t be wrong,” Anders was inevitable idk what to tell you. mages were actively being oppressed and killed, the boot was coming down anyways, Meridith had already been calling for the Right of Anullment before the chantry was even a target. though Anders was the inciting incident that kicked off the mage and templar war, his action was far from the first act of violence.
was the problem ultimately in how his decision was not truly made with the greater mages safety in mind? vengeance instead of justice? no thought to collateral? yeah. but wrong or right, he spoke the truth when he said that they were already dying, it was just a matter of how quick or slow. of course he targeted the chantry, when inaction in the face of oppression is a sort of violence in its own right.