spot the difference

No title available
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open

ellievsbear

oozey mess
occasionally subtle

gracie abrams
todays bird
Fai_Ryy
icyghini twinkie
official daine visual archive
Monterey Bay Aquarium

Discoholic đȘ©
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
will byers stan first human second

â
hello vonnie
macklin celebrini has autism
đȘŒ
sheepfilms
Claire Keane
seen from Singapore
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Russia

seen from Italy
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Russia

seen from Singapore
seen from Cape Verde

seen from El Salvador

seen from United States
seen from Jordan
seen from Ecuador

seen from Iraq
seen from Oman
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Bangladesh
seen from Italy
@taitravnat
spot the difference
I feel like people forget Jackie's possessiveness of Shauna because Jackie would 100% be the one making the wish.
(BTW: I don't like when people compare ships to Nikki and Bear and try to make it non-toxic, so don't take it that way. Saying this because I've seen a lot of that.)
Something about teen Nat carrying herself with a world-weariness, stoicism, and maturity beyond her years while adult Nat has the sulky, angsty energy of a teenager. Natalie âI was so young when I behaved 25. Yet now I find Iâve grown into a tall childâ Scatorccio
Natalie and Travis
The way they are written has me in a chokehold. So incredibly sincere, so desperately intimate and gentle. Every movement of theirs? every expression of their love is so tender.
Natalie had one foot in the grave from the first episode, until travis and javi beat her to it, "wait for me im coming too" is natalie and the martinez siblings.
POV: You have a surface level understanding of a character
It was definitely the situationship that turned Shauna evil you guys! đ€Ą
Not the plane crash, or the starvation, or her dead baby, or butchering Javi, or having her hard work go unnoticed!
And also itâs the fact that Shauna after Jackieâs death (and before the baby died) was arguably pretty chill, outside of talking to a corpse, and was actually being helpful to the others, and even kept Lottie and Natalie from dying of hypothermia.
This take just shows me you have a surface level understanding of Shaunaâs character that goes, âShauna like Jackie, Jackie died, Shauna evil nowâ, and acknowledges nothing else.
I hate when people act like Jackies death was the final blow to Shauna's mental health. Obviously, she still wasn't doing good in s2 but I feel like people ignore how kind she was being. She butchered for them everyday, helped Nat in the bath, whilst there is a literal scene in s2 ep1 or 2 where Mari suggests eating Shauna's share and the others dont agree just because Lottie said so.
People who say that if you ship travnat you don't understand Natalie's character are incredibly dense.
the most important to me. tai's smile to nat...........
My absolute favs
YELLOWJACKETS 2.01 "Friends, Romans, Countrymen"
and she stayed silent after rescue đ
yellowjackets obsession au but its just lottie as bear and travis as nikki
Because bear and nikki are not meant to be inserts for your favourite yj ship!! đ„°
and if u ship travlot this is not for you
Everyone who calls travis and lottie this or "siblings" deadass gotta go
lord im 500 miles from my home
the stag
we have to catch it !!
helllooo sailor
if you hate callie or travis i hate you much more
and if you bitched about travis/callie trying to kill lottie
Nat and Kevynâs dynamic is a lot more interesting that I think people give it credit for (not as a healthy ship but as a window into Natâs character, background, and relationship patterns). Iâm actually really eager to see where it goes in the post-rescue timeline of Season 4.
Kevyn is the catalyst for Natâs fatherâs death. Her dad catching them together in her bedroom is what triggers the violent outburst that leads Nat to grab the rifle. Iâve always imagined thereâs some resentment Nat carries toward Kevyn because of that. Heâs a living reminder of one of the most traumatic moments of her life. Seeing him over and over is almost a form of self-punishment, forcing her to relive her guilt and wonder if things wouldâve been different if she had never invited him over in the first place. Her best (and arguably only) friend is inextricably linked to the memory of her fatherâs brains splattered on the ground.
And I imagine Kevyn carries a fair amount of guilt too. Imagine almost getting beaten by your crushâs father, running for your life, then finding out later he died in a gun âaccidentâ that same day. Does Kevyn ever wonder if he shouldâve stayed to protect her? Does some part of him feel responsible? Does he ever suspect it wasnât really an accident at all?
Then, Nat gets on the plane for Nationals and Kevyn is under the impression that she died, for almost two years. The idealistic image he must have created of her during that time, in his grief. He was a teenage boy completely in love with her for years, and now she has just died tragically young, frozen in time before she had a chance to disappoint him. Thereâs no way he didnât develop a glorified image of her in his mind, a fantasy. And, therefore, it must have been incredibly jarring when the real Natalie returned home as a shell of her former self. She might try to act like her former self, or live up to the fantasy Kevyn has created of her, but she canât put on the mask anymore and the reminder of how much she has changed is unbearable for her, so she ditches him and avoids him for decades.
And their dynamic is so mutually manipulative when they reunite in the adult timeline. Nat is obviously using Kevyn for answers on Travisâ death, fully aware that he has always had feelings for her and intentionally using that against him. She grabs the old mixtape he made her because she knows he has been clinging to a past version of her, and the nostalgia of seeing that tape will make him see past the hardened version of herself she has become.
And Kevyn is using Nat too. Nat tells him Travis, someone she very obviously loved deeply, has just killed himself, but that doesnât stop him from confessing his feelings for her and trying to kiss her that night. Nat pulls away, starts crying, and admits she canât stop thinking about Travis, making it very clear that she is in an emotionally shattered state and nowhere near ready to enter a relationship with someone else. And yet he still pursues her.
She kisses him to seal the deal on her emotional manipulation, but also because sheâs swept up by this nostalgic feeling of being with him, and the scrap of hope sheâs clinging to amidst her intense grief over Travis. Kevyn represents a kind of life boat she is clinging to. Later that night sheâs shown back in her motel room washing her mouth, visibly conflicted. Interestingly, a deleted portion of the scene shows her teenage self standing behind her. I think this symbolizes the version of herself Nat is trying to recreate while sheâs with Kevyn. But that version of Nat is not real to her now, leaving her to perform a role that no longer fits while her younger self mourns who she has become.
Then Kevyn gives her Travisâ autopsy records, positioning himself as the person who can save her, help her, fix things for her. Nat says she âowes him,â and Kevyn immediately cashes that vulnerability in by asking her out again. When she turns him down, he literally drives to her motel to convince her otherwise.
And on that date, Nat has an obvious trauma flashback severe enough that she has to physically isolate herself to calm down. Kevyn once again steps into the role of the understanding savior, reassuring her that he accepts her trauma and loves her anyway, before sleeping with her that same night while she is actively grieving Travis and very likely still emotionally destabilized from the flashback.
Kevyn genuinely cares about Nat, but thereâs still an undeniable selfishness in the way he approaches her vulnerability. He wants to be needed by her. He wants to be the person who finally ârescuesâ Natalie Scatorccio, and that desire repeatedly overrides the reality that she is drowning in grief, addiction, trauma, and emotional instability throughout almost all of their interactions in the adult timeline. I canât help but wonder how much of Kevynâs âknight in shining armorâ savior fantasy is connected to the guilt he still holds over running away when Natâs father caught them together decades ago.
Nat (after stealing his gun while heâs sleeping and using it to go on a heist) tells the other survivors how âniceâ Kevyn is with sincerity in her tone, which I think shows how poorly Nat is accustomed to being treated by men, as well as the desperate, vulnerable state she is in; reaching out for any form of love and connection she can get even when itâs unhealthy and based on a lie.
And then the next morning, when Kevyn confronts her about the gun and Nat immediately lashes out, accusing him of still clinging to a âhigh school crushâ on her, the tragedy is that sheâs right. Kevyn insists he accepts Natâs trauma and loves her anyway, but the moment her trauma manifests in an ugly, inconvenient, real way, he walks away. He loves the idealized version of Natalie he preserved in his head after the crash, not the reality of the deeply damaged woman who came back.
At the same time, the scene is undeniably an act of self-sabotage from Nat. She senses intimacy and vulnerability getting too close, and she detonates the relationship before she can risk it.
Nat and Kevyn both seem to have used this relationship as an attempt to recreate or relive their teenagehood or live out a version of their lives that could have been. Their conversations revolve around past memories and nostalgia.
Adult Kevyn is dissatisfied with the life he ended up with rather than consciously chose. Heâs recently divorced, stuck in a job that feels more like a something he fell into than one he passionately pursued, and he probably knows that the goth, anarchist teenager he once was would be horrified to learn he grew up to be a cop with a failed music career, a failed marriage, and weekends spent at childrenâs soccer games. Nat embodies the rebellious, reckless, alive version of himself that he lost somewhere along the way. He romanticizes memories of running through alleyways with her, stealing chemistry lab equipment to make bongs, and listening to Nirvana back when it felt like it belonged only to the two of them.
For Nat, her dynamic with Kevyn gives her a glimpse at the version of herself that could have been if the crash had never happened, or, going back even further, who she could have been without the trauma of her fatherâs death. Trauma fundamentally altered her relationship to herself. After the guilt of her fatherâs death, and especially after everything she did in the wilderness, she doesnât allow herself to love or create any form of happiness in her life, believing she doesnât deserve it. She runs from stability, never even allows herself to have a home address, and destroys any potential of peace that presents itself to her.
Kevyn offers her a vision of an ordinary life. A healthy relationship with a man who is kind to her and has a stable position in life. A home. A family. Standing on the sidelines of a soccer game, cheering for a kid. The small, mundane comforts that most people take for granted. He presents a tantalizing âwhat if,â a version of Natalie who chose life instead of punishment.
And after a lifetime of self-loathing, Kevynâs idealization of her feels intoxicating. His unwavering belief in her offers a kind of validation sheâs rarely experienced (akin to moments in the wilderness she thrived on, such as being cheered on when she brought food back to the group or when she was initially crowned as the new leader). What begins as manipulation (a means of getting information about Travisâ death) slowly starts to feel like a genuine attempt to imagine a future for herself after losing the last thing that gave her life direction: the promise she made with Travis.
But thatâs also why the relationship is so inauthentic. Neither of them is really seeing the other as they are in the present. Theyâre both in love with possibilities, with ghosts, with alternate timelines. What draws them together isnât compatibility so much as longing. The relationship becomes a vessel for grief, nostalgia, and regret. And for Natalie especially, that hope is less a sign of healing than an act of desperation, a last attempt to find something worth living for before the darkness closes in again (and, as we see, it does catch up to her again once the fantasy of Kevyn fades).
In their last scene together at the reunion, Nat watches Kevyn finally let her (and the idea of her) go, and at the same time, she stares at Travisâ photo in the memorial case and accepts that he ended his own life and broke their promise. In that moment, the two final scraps tethering her to life are both shattered: her brief fantasy of an ordinary happy life with Kevyn, and the desperate distraction of her hunt for Travisâ supposed killer, both of which briefly prevented her from really sitting with the reality that she is deeply alone by her own design. And we know what she decides to do immediately following this scene.
And then, at Lottieâs compound, they both end up dying on the same night in the exact same way and are wheeled out on body bags right next to each other.
Iâm excited to see this important gap in their timeline, this post-rescue period where Kevynâs glorified ideal of Nat and the hollowed out shell she has become after the rescue collide. Kevyn is an essential piece of Natâs story, whether we like him or not.
Something that has been making me extremely uncomfortable, particularly in the Travnat fandom on Twitter, that I just can't hold in anymore is how excitedly people talk about the idea of Nat hitting and abusing Travis post-rescue.
If your headcanon is that Nat, despite desperately trying not to, ends up replicating the cycle of abuse she grew up with because her father was her primary model for love and intimacy, thatâs a legitimate and potentially compelling thing to explore. I may not agree with it personally, but I can understand why people would want to explore this concept. Trauma survivors can reenact harmful dynamics, and thereâs room for serious discussion and meta about that.
What bothers me is the way itâs very often framed by the fans. Iâm constantly seeing posts along the lines of, âI canât wait until Nat hits Travis in Season 4 and he apologizes to her afterwards,â or referring to the idea of Nat slapping Travis as âjuicyâ or âdeliciousâ (I kid you not I have seen this), joking about Nat controlling where Travis goes because she's possessive, casting them into the roles of Obsession, celebrating the idea of an aggressive, abusive Nat and a submissive, victimized Travis as if it's a fun ship dynamic they're eager to see play out, ETC. Thatâs far from really engaging with the tragedy of abuse or trauma.
Domestic violence is a real thing that many people have experienced, and I don't think it should ever be discussed this lightly, even when we're talking about fictional characters. It's not something fun or shippy. It's not something to pair with reaction gifs.
I grew up in a violent household, and every time I try to spend time on Travnat Twitter, I end up getting genuinely triggered by some of the things fellow Travnats are saying. It's frustrating, because I'm literally just trying to run a cute little Travnat account. I don't really know what else to call it besides the admittedly overused and often eyeroll-worthy words: romanticization and fetishization of abuse. I don't enjoy watching something that has caused real suffering in my life be treated like a fun fandom trope.
Especially with characters like Nat and Travis. Nat is a character whose entire life has been shaped by the violence she witnessed and experienced at home, the idea of her becoming anything like her father after so many years of internalizing all of her anger to prevent this should feel absolutely devastating, not exciting. And Travis experienced unimaginable abuse and coercion in the wilderness, which resulted in him having to conform and make himself small, compliant, and invisible as a survival mechanism. In your post-rescue headcanon, Travis' abuse is being perpetuated by arguably the only person he felt safe with out there. That is tragic and dark and horrifying. Imagine if the roles were reversed and people were excitedly talking about Travis hitting and abusing Nat next season. I highly doubt the response would be the same. If you can see the discomfort and wrongness in that, why can't you see it the other way around? Also, you know making light of Doomcoming is wrong, so why is this situation any different?
I often see this urge with het ships within queer fanbases to "justify" it by casting the woman into a very dominant role and the man into a submissive one. Which is fine! But I think this concept can go way too far, as is becoming the case with some Travnat fans.
Please remember the seriousness of the subjects you are discussing, and how real victims are reading what you're saying about these subjects.