Timothée Chalamet and Music Miseducation, Part 2
Let's segue what's behind the never-ending cultural debate about whether ancient art forms like opera and ballet are still relevant—or if they’re just kept on life support by rich patrons and guilty elitists who feel obligated to clap politely at things they don’t actually enjoy. Recall that it's the artistic equivalent of eating pinakbet because your Filipina lola insists mga gulay are good for you, even though everyone at the table would rather be inhaling Chickenjoy.
It all came to a head in late February 2026, when Timothée Chalamet dropped a truth bomb at a town hall hosted by CNN and Variety. With the casual confidence of someone who has never had to pirouette for a paycheck, he mused aloud that maybe, just maybe, ballet and opera are only still kicking because of some collective sense of duty rather than genuine enthusiasm.
"I don’t want to be working in ballet, or opera, or things where it’s like, 'Hey, keep this thing alive, even though like no one cares about this anymore,'" he said, blissfully unaware that he had just activated the rage of every balletomane and opera buff within earshot. Then, with the diplomatic finesse of a man who knows he’s about to be ratioed, he tacked on, "All respect to all the ballet and opera people out there."
Cue the outrage. Critics clutched their monocles, industry veterans huffed about "disrespect," classical vocalists clutched their "Baroque pearls," and social media and news sites briefly imploded under the weight of thinkpieces titled "Timothée Chalamet Just Canceled Culture" and "Why Youthful Arrogance Is Killing the Arts" (titles not completely accurate).
And it was partially why Chalamet – who himself has 3 relatives who’d danced ballet – got snubbed at the 98th Academy Awards. But here’s the thing: was he wrong?
Let’s be honest—how many people under 40 genuinely wake up thinking, "You know what I need today? Three hours of countertenors ROFLing in Italian, with strings and basso continuo." (See timestamp 4:50 of video above.) Or, "Yes, I’d love to spend my evening watching people portraying ghosts of maidens who'd succumbed to St. Vitus's Dance kill a village gamekeeper en pointe."
Sure, ballet and opera have their devotees, but let’s not pretend they’re pulling stadium numbers.
And then there’s the funding issue — oh, the funding issue. Ballet companies and opera houses survive on a precarious cocktail of wealthy donors, government grants, and the occasional desperate Nutcracker reconstruction to pay the bills.
Meanwhile, music education in schools has been gutted so thoroughly that many kids today think Rodelinda is a supporting NPC character of Super Mario Galaxy and Swan Lake is a fancy swimming pool.
Enter Hellene Hiner, Ukrainian-American piano teacher and founder of the Soft Mozart piano pedagogy method, who saw the points of those who'd actually agreed with Chalamet. Not because she thinks opera is obsolete, but because she argues that classical arts suffer from an accessibility problem. And that problem mostly lies in how youths'd learn how to play the piano.
There - I said it. It mostly comes down to the curricula of youths' piano lessons.
"The root of (classical music's survival) is musical literacy," Hiner justly posited, "The masses are musically illiterate; they do not read or understand music notation. Roots rot, teeth hurt and fall out. With a drunken perseverance, we keep putting new and new crowns on sick decaying teeth. At our own expense."
Now replace "teeth" with "opera houses" and "crowns" with "productions of Rinaldo for audiences comprising apiece of twelve retirees and a confused tourist." Voilà! You’ve got the state of classical arts funding. Hiner’s not wrong — musical illiteracy is the root canal no one wants to sit through. If you can’t read sheet music, a Johann Sebastian Bach cantata might as well be a spreadsheet in Thai.
And let’s be honest, if your idea of a good time isn’t deciphering polyphonic counterpoint, why would you subject yourself to Bach's St. John Passion, BWV 245?
But here’s the kicker — instead of asking why the masses find these art forms dull (hint: it’s not just the lack of TikTok integration), the response is to double down on funding. It’s like propping up a crumbling palace with gold bars while ignoring the fact that nobody lives there anymore.
Hiner and Chalamet both take aim at the absurdity of pouring money into institutions that, for most people, might as well be museum exhibits.
Hiner, that brave soul shouting into the void, pointed out what we all know but pretend not to notice: clip culture hasn’t just nibbled at our attention spans; it’s taken a chainsaw to them, leaving us with the attention retention of a goldfish on espresso.
And what’s the casualty? Classical music, that poor, neglected art form, now sitting in the corner like a forgotten grandparent at a rave.
The root of this apathy, Hiner argues (and she’s not wrong), is musical illiteracy—a condition so widespread it might as well be classified as a pandemic. Even worse, the relentless popularity of hip-hop, electronic, rap, and pop music isn’t just competing with classical; it’s actively bulldozing over it like a drunk toddler with a toy truck.
A 2015 study by SeatSmart — the UK’s premier classroom seating organization software — revealed that the lyrical complexity of the most popular songs of the 2000s and 2010s hovered around a third-grade Flesch-Kincaid reading level. That’s right. We’ve regressed from Shakespearean sonnets to lyrics that could’ve been written by a moderately literate eight-year-old with a thesaurus (but only if the thesaurus was replaced by emojis).
This lyrical lobotomy has consequences. When your brain gets hooked on the linguistic equivalent of cotton candy — songs like Mark Ronson and Bruno Mars's "Uptown Funk," where the deepest philosophical musing is, "Don’t believe me, just watch!"— then the intricate, polyphonic layers of Gottes Zeit is die allerbeste Zeit, BWV 106, don’t just sound complex; they sound like pure, unfiltered noise.
It’s like trying to appreciate - as the music teacher of the West Monroe, LA, based classical Christian charter school Geneva Academy, Jarrod Richey, best analogized - a scratch-grilled steak after a lifetime of eating nothing but baby food. Your palate just can’t compute.
Speaking of Bach, let’s talk about his St. Matthew Passion, BWV 244, a masterpiece so dense it makes Tolstoy look like a Twitter thread.
Once translated into English (assuming you’re using the New American Bible to translate the Gospel recitatives), the text demands a reading level roughly four to six grades above your average Billboard chart-topper (about 9ish on the Flesch-Kincaid scale). That’s the difference between reading "See Spot run" and deciphering a doctoral thesis on medieval Gregorian chant.
A latter example is "APT.," the 2024 viral duet by Rosé and Mars — a song so lyrically sparse it makes Pinkfong's "Baby Shark" look like Dante’s Inferno.
With a Flesch-Kincaid reading level estimated at a staggering 1.1, it’s the musical equivalent of a participation trophy. And yet, it’s addictive. Why? Because the human brain, tragically, is a sucker for repetition. That hook isn’t just catchy; it’s a cognitive parasite, burrowing into your auditory cortex and refusing to leave, like a squatter who’s also really into karaoke.
In South Korea, high school students preparing for the Suneung — a college admission test so stressful it makes the SAT look like a casual crossword puzzle — have reported legitimate fear that "APT." and its K-pop cousins would likely hijack their brains mid-exam, transforming their carefully memorized equations into an involuntary internal DJ set.
Imagine: you’re knee-deep in calculus, sweat dripping onto your Scantron, when suddenly — bam — your mental jukebox blasts the refrain of "APT." on loop.
Chaeyoung-iga joahaneun. Random game. Random game.
No "SKY" (Seoul National, Korea, or Yonsei) university diploma and a white-collar job for you.
But the pièce de résistance? A Malaysian student, presumably in a fit of either rebellion or sheer auditory possession, decided that her language arts exam was the perfect place to transcribe the lyrics to "APT." instead of actually responding to the essay prompt supporting her response with what she read in Yuzaini Rahya’s sci-fi novel Tawanan Komander Caucasus.
Her teacher, in a move that was equal parts exasperation and opportunistic content creation, zoomed in on the lyrical "essay" for a TikTok reel captioned with the kind of disappointment usually reserved for finding out your dog ate your term paper — and then barfed it up on your diploma.
Hiner posits, with the zeal of a revolutionary and the precision of a neuroscientist, that music is not some arcane secret whispered only to the initiated, but a visual, kinesthetic language that, when properly presented, should click into place with the satisfying simplicity of a binary system. You know, like turning a light switch on or off—except instead of illumination, you get Mozart.
Somewhere in the aftermath of Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart’s era, the logic of music notation underwent a sort of intellectual mitosis, splitting into fragments designed to serve a newly professionalized elite. The result? A system that effectively locked the general public out of true musical comprehension like bouncers at an exclusive club, leaving generations of would-be musicians to fumble with sheet music as if it were encrypted by the CIA.
And here’s where Hiner really throws down the gauntlet: she declares traditional piano lessons to be, in her words, “sadistic.” Picture, if you will, the plight of a child staring at those horizontal hieroglyphics we call musical notation, desperately trying to translate them into vertical finger movements on the keyboard. It’s like asking someone to read a novel (say, as mentioned, Tanauan Komander Caucasus) while standing on their head—technically possible, but guaranteed to induce both dizziness and despair.
The real kicker? Hiner argues that the human brain, that impatient little miracle-worker, demands immediate answers to its persistent cognitive question: “Am I doing this right, or am I about to embarrass myself?” When traditional teaching methods respond with abstract theory and endless rote repetition, it’s no wonder students develop what Hiner dramatically terms a “disconnected musical soul”—a condition that sounds like it should be treatable with herbal tea and a good therapist.
The irony isn't lost on us that Chalamet's alma mater, the prestigious LaGuardia High School, likely subjected him to this very traditional model of musical education. Meaning that when he learned piano mainly for his role as Elio Perlman in Call Me By Your Name, he was probably wrestling with the same frustrating translation process that Hiner rails against.
According to her theory, this means Chalamet might never achieve true “music literacy” — not just in the sense of hitting the right notes, but in the deeper, more profound ability to perceive a symphony’s narrative structure as effortlessly as one absorbs the plot of a paperback novel.
Hiner’s solution to this centuries-old problem is nothing short of a pedagogical time machine. She’s essentially conducting an 11th-century restoration project, dusting off the innovations of Guido d’Arezzo—a medieval monk who, in a stroke of genius, created a system based on the beautifully binary distinction between notes on lines versus notes in spaces.
Hiner takes this ancient insight and gives it a modern makeover, color-coding the Grand Staff like a kindergartener’s dream: brown for the bass clef lines, green for the treble clef lines. This isn’t just decorative—it’s cognitive judo, allowing the brain to bypass the tedious “naming” phase of music and leap straight into the “doing” phase.
To Hiner, the Grand Staff isn’t just a collection of symbols; it’s an entire ecosystem. Notes and keys don’t just coexist — they’re entangled in a relationship more interdependent than a rom-com couple. The connection between them isn’t some abstract concept to be laboriously memorized; it’s right there in the physicality of lines and spaces, more obvious and intuitive than forcing students to associate arbitrary letter names with keys.
What if Hiner had packed up her life in Soviet Ukraine and immigrated to America before 1975. And suppose that by 1982, Soft Mozart had taken root in preschools across the nation, creating generations of toddlers who could identify a fugue before they could pronounce McDonald's?
6 years later, we might have been spared the earth-shaking cultural phenomenon that was L'Trimm's Miami bass masterpiece "Cars That Go Boom." Those poor, misguided souls who spent their paychecks on subwoofers capable of rattling fillings loose might instead had trained as early music scholars or - gasp - professional countertenors.
What a tragic loss for parking lot bass battles — but what a win for civilizational refinement and noise pollution mitigation!
Judge Paul Sacco's legendary music immersion program in Fort Lupton, CO — where noise ordinance offenders were subjected to endless loops of The Platters' "Only You" and Minnie Ripperton's "Loving You" — might never have been necessary back in 1998. The streets would have been silent but for the gentle strains of Antonio Vivaldi's Nisi Dominus, RV 608, drifting from rolled-down windows.
No need for judicial musical waterboarding when the populace voluntarily attends the Denver Early Music Festival.
This hypothetical scenario exposes our cultural schizophrenia about sound. When musical literacy atrophies, what remains is either tribal marking or pure annoyance. The boom car enthusiast isn't just sharing music — he's staking territorial claims through sonic deforestation.
Judge Sacco's genius was fighting fire with fire, or rather, fighting noise with greater psychological torment. It's the musical equivalent of feeding a picky eater nothing but plain oatmeal until they beg for broccoli. Hiner — bless her pitch-perfect heart — approaches music as cognitive calisthenics, treating the brain like a muscle that must flex through scales and arpeggios.
Meanwhile, over at Geneva Academy (and the Delta Youth Chorale as well as the annual Jubilate Deo Summer Music Camp), Richey is framing music education as affection-shaping soulcraft. His notion of "training our musical loves" sounds suspiciously like emotional indoctrination — but frankly, if the choice is between Erschallet, ihr Lieder, erklinget, ihr Saiten!, BWV 172, and "Baby Shark," I'll take the indoctrination.
Richey's interview with Monroe Symphony Orchestra's John Mason Hodges drops this theological mic: classical music isn't just pleasing patterns — it's God's math made audible. When Chalamet dismisses it (including opera and ballet suites) as irrelevant, he's not being edgy; he's admitting he never learned to read the divine Rosetta Stone of quarter notes.
Let's talk about Richey's culinary metaphor, because nothing says "high culture" like comparing Bach to a well-made bistec Tagalog, if the main steaks were filets mignons and the mga sibuyas Tagalog were caramelized and braised in imported fine red wine. His warning about "musical junk food" explains why parents develop nervous tics upon hearing the opening bars of "Baby Beluga."
Dr. Jeff Lee's 2023 case study of the mom who yeeted a Raffi CD mid-road trip from Seattle to Winthrop after looping that said song by her toddler's demand isn't just humorous — it's Darwinian adaptation. The human brain recoils from endless repetitions of aquatic mammal songs like a body rejecting a poorly matched organ.
Victoria Greenan, of the Magical Music Method, lamented, "Many children today can instantly recognize celebrities, brand logos, or influencers, but cannon name a single composer, a famous painter, or a constellation in the sky." Simply put, many a youth back in 1988 could instantly recognize Lady Tigra or Bunny D but neither recognized George Friedric Handel nor Nicola Francesco Haym if they'd bitten him on, as Experience Unlimited posited, "’Da Butt."
In her worldview, beauty persists like cosmic background radiation — present even when no one's tuning in. Greenan's defiance against the "14 cents in viewership" mentality is the artistic equivalent of maintaining Latin: impractical, glorious, and quietly revolutionary. The throughline here is rebellion against what Dr. Lee calls the "childhood industrial complex" — that machinery pumping out sanitized, algorithm-approved "content" masquerading as culture.
Richey's vision of hymn-singing students isn't about creating choirbots; it's about restoring what Hiner calls the "doer" mentality. Because when music becomes purely consumptive—when we stop singing and only listen, stop playing and only watch—we become passive recipients of someone else's emotional agenda.
If you’ve stumbled upon this little post thinking it’s some thinly veiled takedown of Chalamet’s filmography or a manifesto against the entire pop-industrial complex, lemme cook.
Chalamet’s now-infamous quip about opera and ballet being relics for the museum crowd? That’s not just a hot take — it’s the molten core of what CS Lewis dubbed "chronological snobbery," a term so deliciously academic it makes you want to dust off your elbow patches.
The gist? Assuming anything older than your social media feed is irrelevant simply because it predates wireless earbuds. It’s the cultural equivalent of throwing out your nanay's heirloom china because it clashes with your IKEA flatware.
Richey advises parents: "If your family playlists seem dry, decide that you’re going to water them with richer, deeper music." Translation: Your Spotify algorithm is a dystopian wasteland, and you’re the one holding the watering can.
Richey’s prescription? Think of it as musical crop rotation. For every three servings of Billie Eilish, toss in countertenor Alexander Chance's rendition of "Jesus ist ein guter Hirt" from Bach's Ich bin ein guter Hirt, BWV 85. Let Taylor Swift and Lady Gaga share airtime with the ilk of Susan Gritton, Deborah York, Nancy Argenta, Patrizia Kwella, or Dame Emma Kirkby. It’s not about ditching the new — it’s about refusing to let the old gather dust in the attic.
But here’s where things get spicy. Hiner, meanwhile, drops the mic: "The Grand Staff is not a set of three elements, but rather it is a system that can and should be simultaneously taught as one." In layman’s terms? We’ve been teaching music like it’s a disassembled IKEA shelf — handing kids screws and planks one at a time without showing them the picture on the box.
Hiner’s method? Teach the whole dang language at once. Notes aren’t just dots on a page; they’re sounds, symbols, and rhythms holding hands in a conga line. Imagine a world where school boards — those notorious penny-pinchers — treated music budgets like Amazon Prime subscriptions instead of dial-up internet by implementing Soft Mozart. Where parents raced to piano recitals with the same fervor as Little League playoffs.
Where "family jam sessions" weren’t a euphemism for a tito butchering "Even the Nights Are Better" on the Magic Sing after three bottles of Red Horse. (Look, I love me some Air Supply, but I would belt their ballads out while sober, maraming salamat.)
Soft Mozart, had it debuted in the neon glory of 1982 instead of the Y2K panic, might’ve rewritten Chalamet’s music literacy destiny. Picture it: tiny Timothée, age six, decoding Mozart sonatas between viewings of The NeverEnding Story.
Fast forward to the 98th Academy Awards. Chalamet’s acceptance speech would’ve been peppered with references to Rudolf Nureyev or high school concert bands crediting Richard Wagner for their existence through Lucien Cailliet's masterful transcription of the chorus that is sung as Elsa processes to the cathedral in the opera Lohengrin.
Or that he could’ve said that the same high school concert bands had credited Bach for inspiring audiences via Robert Leist and Richard Franko Goldman's arrangement of the second movement of Fantasia in G Major, BWV 572 – while he would’ve received his Oscars he could've won in the first place.
Alas, we live in the timeline where music programs are the first being chopped down in the budgetary jungle. But here’s the twist: the tools exist. The desert can be irrigated. (Salamat po, Ginong Lewis.)
"Exposure to the arts is not the same as true music literacy," Hiner concluded, as a response to a comment I made on a post in the Soft Mozart Facebook group, "One may grow up around performances, institutions, and artistic prestige, and still never be taught how music actually works as a language."
This is exactly why real musical education matters so much. Music literacy should not belong only to a narrow circle. It should be accessible to the wider public, so that people can not only admire music from afar, but truly read it, understand it, and make it part of their lives. The question is whether we’ll keep eating sonic "baby food" or ACTUALLY cook up the musical equivalent of bistec.
Or rather, seeing the Grand Staff as ANYTHING but an integrated system.