Donât discriminate!
I'd rather be in outer space đž

oozey mess

No title available

PR's Tumblrdome

â
Xuebing Du
h
ojovivo

@theartofmadeline
trying on a metaphor
Cosimo Galluzzi
đȘŒ

No title available
YOU ARE THE REASON

shark vs the universe
tumblr dot com
Sade Olutola
d e v o n

#extradirty
Noah Kahan
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Argentina
seen from Iraq
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
@thefellowshipofthegeeks
Donât discriminate!
On the 1st of July this year, the 100th anniversary of the start of the battle of the Somme, men in uniforms provided an eerie spectacle handing out the names of killed soldiers at the UK train stations they departed form a hundred years before. #wearehere
@rtrixie
What a great way to remember the humanity of those who die in battle.
ANNOUNCEMENT: While The Fellowship of the Geeks strives to be nonpartisan, we would like to announce that we are formally endorsing Steve Rogers, otherwise known as Captain America, for president in this election season.
*This image was found on The Internet. All credited to the original creator who lurks somewhere in the Cyberworld.
On the Beauty of Each Wonderful Life
By Joey Garrity
One of the most timeless Christmas stories of the past century is Frank Capra's classic film It's a Wonderful Life. Â Initially a box office disappointment in December 1946, it has became nearly as universally associated with the Christmas season as Charles Dickens' A Christmas Carol, and is watched by millions of people every December. Â The story centers around George Bailey, an everyman living in the small town of Bedford Falls, whose father owns the local Bailey Building and Loan. Â George has always dreamed of traveling the world, but upon his father's death he finds himself faced with the decision to either take up his father's position as head of the company or relinquish it to the miser, Henry Potter, who wants nothing less than ownership of the entire town. Â He becomes a local hero among many of the townsfolk, building homes and helping those in need. Â He soon marries his high school sweetheart and has three children, and they move into an old abandoned house in town, effectively rooting themselves â and George â in Bedford Falls for good.
But just when everything seems happy for George, disaster strikes. Â On Christmas Eve, his uncle and business partner, Billy, misplaces eight thousand dollars of the Bailey Building and Loan's funds. This disaster puts the Building and Loan at Potterâs mercy, and George at risk for arrest and prosecution for a misuse of funds. As a last resort, George stops by Mr. Potter's office to ask his archenemy for help â and mercy â where he reveals that the only money he has left that could possibly save the company is his ten thousand dollars of life insurance. Â Potter laughs, saying George is âworth more dead than alive.â Â He then calls up the police to tell the tale, and they immediately issue a warrant for George's arrest on charges of misappropriation of funds, leaving George with two options: live, and face federal prison and bankruptcy, or die and save the company and his family, as he believes that his life insurance will cover the debt. Feeling no hope, he drives to a bridge and prepares to jump, only to be saved by his guardian angel, Clarence, who offers to show him what the world would look like if he had never been born.
It's a Wonderful Life offered a life-affirming look at the issue of suicide at a time when it was still somewhat a taboo subject. Â But it is more relevant than ever with the rising rates of suicides among teenagers and young adults. Â When many of us first saw the film as children, we likely echoed Clarence's initial commentary that money is a silly thing to kill yourself over. Â Upon reaching adulthood though, the realization hits us that the fear of debt is a real thing that affects many people, even young people with rising college tuition and a higher cost of living. Â But as Clarence shows George, each of us makes a greater impact on the world than we will ever know. Â In an alternate world where George was never born, his brother, Harry, a local WWII hero in the community, died at the age of nine because George didn't rescue him from drowning after he fell through thin ice. Â Because Harry didnât survive childhood to go to war, an entire transport of soldiers died. Â Many of the people George helped throughout his life were also in prison or struggling to survive in an alternate Bedford Falls, known as Pottersville, without Georgeâs influence through the Building and Loan. In this alternate world, Potter took control of the entire town and converted it into a commercialistic wasteland.
None of us truly know how many lives we have impacted or how much we have changed the world for the better. Â We also can never be certain that our conditions will not improve, as the film shows, for as it turns out, ultimately, George's friends and family raise enough money to save the business and keep him out of jail. Â The only thing his death would have achieved would have been to leave his wife a widow, and his children, fatherless â and it would have left Bedford Falls without a wonderful human being.
One final note must be made about Mr. Potter's statement that George is âworth more dead than alive.â  Potter almost seemed as if he was encouraging George to take his life.  Just as Susan B. Anthony's Revolution declared, âthrice guilty is he who, for selfish gratificationâŠdrove her to the desperation which impelled her to [abortion]â1, just so is he who drives one to suicide or actively encourages it.  In many places in today's culture, it seems popular to use âgo kill yourselfâ as a retort against someone's unpopular opinion.  This is an attitude that needs to end.  Even in jest, this is a threat on par with any other threat of violence.  No one is worth more dead than alive, because everyone's life is wonderful and worth living.  Let us appreciate the impact of each and every individual life in our world.
Saw your prolife sign on DailySignal. Congrats!
Oh my goodness! Thank you so much! One of our founding members is totally dancing for joy to hear that.For those of you who wanted to see this article:Â http://dailysignal.com/2016/01/22/35-of-the-most-interesting-signs-at-the-march-for-life/
The Fellowship of the Ring: Taking Courage Instead of Taking Life
By: Joey Garrity and Amelia Haynes
 The legendary story of The Lord of the Rings begins with The Fellowship of the Ring, in which all of Hobbiton is preparing to celebrate the hobbit, Bilbo Baggins' 111st birthday. But after Bilbo disappears using the ring he acquired from Gollum in the novel The Hobbit and leaves it to Frodo, it becomes clear that there is something much more evil at work. After a few years, the wizard Gandalf returns to Bag End to examine the ring. He tells Frodo the story of its making and path through history, explaining that it was created by the Dark Lord Sauron, and provides a source of almost unlimited power to any who chooses to wield it; and finally, he also explains how it can be destroyed once and for all.
      One of the greatest arguments against of the death penalty can be found in Gandalf's story of Gollum, and discussion with Frodo at Bag End. Upon hearing the story of Gollum's past and the death he caused to many (including his own family), Frodo states that he has no pity for Gollum and cannot understand why his uncle Bilbo spared him during the events of The Hobbit. Gandalf responds with one of the greatest summaries of the consistent life ethic to be found in The Fellowship of the Ring, if not any literature in human history: âDeserves it! I daresay he does. Many that live deserve death. And some that die deserve life. Can you give it to them? Then do not be too eager to deal out death in judgement. For even the very wise cannot see all ends. I have not much hope that Gollum can be cured before he dies, but there is a chance of it.â
Of course, it turns out in the end that Gollum does not turn from his evil ways. But this does not mean that he should have been killed by Bilbo when they first met, or by Frodo or Sam, because if he hadn't been spared, then Frodo and Sam may have not been able to get into Mordor to destroy the One Ring. We never know if one who has committed great crimes will one day turn from them but in the meantime we should always give them the benefit of the doubt and respect their right to live as a human being. This also can be applied to post-abortive women because despite committing a heinous act many have come to realize the horror of abortion, and now dedicate all of their strength and efforts to ending the legalized injustice they once accepted.
      Confronted with the potential task of taking the One Ring to the Cracks of Doom to destroy it once and for all, Frodo feels a passion to see the One Ring destroyed, but a reluctance to make the journey, and wishes the Ring had never come to him. To this, Gandalf answers: âYou may be sure it was not for any merit that others do not possess: not for power or wisdom, at any rate. But you have been chosen, and you must therefore use such strength and heart and wits as you have.â Often when we are confronted with injustice in our world, we feel a powerlessness to do anything even though we have a strong passion to help. But as Gandalf says, what we have to offer is enough. Even a tiny hobbit with no combat experience can stand up against the ultimate evil and win. We may feel like we are not powerful enough to stop the injustices of abortion, unjust war, and all other legalized violence. But we will stand against it with âsuch strength and heart and witâ as we have. And we will not back down even in the face of great evil with all the power and influence in the world. Just as Frodo sets off with Sam, Merry, and Pippin on the first steps of his journey, so we begin with others; we are not alone either. We all have the power to take a stand together.
      The second half of The Fellowship of the Ring begins with Frodo waking in Rivendell, and transitions from the quest of the hobbits simply getting the One Ring away from the Shire to their decision to take a stand against the evil of Sauron and participate in having the One Ring destroyed. The decisions of the hobbits (and other characters) frequently demonstrate courage, perseverance, and selflessness when they have to choose between doing what is right and what is easy. Thus, like us, the ordinary hobbits are called to move from a simple understanding of "right" to an active choice to defend it, from the more passive quest of fleeing with the Ring to decisive task of putting their will and lives into destroying it, whatever the personal cost.
When GlĂłin the Dwarf explains that messengers of Sauron have been threatening the dwarves and demanding information concerning Bilbo (and thereby, the One Ring, as Sauron believes Bilbo still possesses it), he shows the courage of the dwarves as they have refused to sell out Bilbo. âThere is naught that you can do, other than to resist, with hope or without it. But you do not stand alone.â The dwarves are well aware that Sauron is an evil, unjust destroyer of life, and they have stood firm in refusing to betray their friend. Often when people take a stand against injustice it can seem very hopeless. But that does not mean we should give up on standing for whatâs right. Forty-two years ago, Roe v. Wade was passed, striking down all restrictions on the willful taking of human life through the act of abortion. But today, because so many pro-lifers have made a stand and used their voices, most babies in the United States are protected from abortion at least in the third trimester of pregnancy. Many are also protected in the second trimester. Though there is still a long way to go, we also have come a long way. Similar to the Hobbits who travelled a long way just to get to Rivendell, we have travelled far, bringing us closer and closer to protecting the most vulnerable of our fellow human beings. It may have seemed hopeless before, but the courage of those who refused to give up on fighting injustice has brought about change.
Perhaps one of the most significant demonstrations of courage in the entirety of The Lord of the Rings is when Frodo volunteers himself to destroy the One Ring. The members of the Council are silent, knowing that someone has to fulfill the task at handâuntil Frodo speaks up: âI will take the Ring, though I do not know the way.â
By all accounts, Frodo is far from the best-suited for the task: he is small, not strong, nor well-travelledâhe does not know the lands between Rivendell and Mordor. But he sees a need and rises to the task. I think most people have a point in their lives when they are aware there is some injustice going on, but feel they are helpless. Itâs easy to think we need a great leader like Martin Luther King Jr. or Sophie Scholl or William Wilberforce to end injustice. But every great leader was a normal human being who, like Frodo, saw something that needed to be fought, and took a standâthey did not always know how they could end injustice, but like Frodo, they were willing to do whatever it took. The buildup of the first half of The Fellowship of the Ring demonstrates just how lighthearted the hobbits were, just how easy their lives were, only to turn them out into the world â they  leave all of that behind  willingly, knowing the danger and not knowing it, and step out of themselves. Everyone who stands against injustice starts somewhere, and he or she starts with a choice, not knowing the outcome.
One important sub-theme within the Fellowship is the unity of the races. They all have different cultures and lifestyles, yet they are able to come together for a common cause. The friendship of Gimli and Legolas is particularly significant as the elves and dwarves have been enemies for around six thousand years at this point. In LothlĂłrien, the elves again extend friendship towards Gimli, despite the millennia of odds between their races. âMay it be a sign that though the world is now dark better days are at hand, and that friendship shall be renewed between our people,â Celebornâthe Lord of LothlĂłrien and husband of Galadrielâ tells Gimli. The unity of the Fellowship demonstrates that when there is an injustice that needs to be fought, we need to be united with, and not divided from, those who are different. Whether itâs different political views, religions, skin colors, habits, personal choices, or a whole other range of things, justice canât wait. We canât stand aside while the lives and liberties of others are threatened just because someone looks or thinks differently than us. Unity is vital to the cause of justice.
If there is one thing to take away from the protagonists in the Fellowship, it is their enduring courage. They are continually given a choice between what they know is right, and what looks easy, and they choose to do what is right. Taking a stand to defend the right to life is often difficult and intimidating at times, but if we donât take a stand, who will? It doesnât take someone with great strength or great public speaking skills to change the world. Justice needs everyone; people of every color, faith, sexual orientation, and political view to say âNo more.â Not moving forward for the Fellowship did not mean staying put. It meant going backward. Sauron was coming for the Ring. In the same way, life cannot wait. If we are not standing up actively, we are allowing the Culture of Death to advance. We must say, âNo more.â âI will take the Ring, though I do not know the way.â
MAY 21 - NICOLE TICEA
At just fifteen years old, Vancouver high school student Nicole Ticea developed an early-stage HIV test thatâs as easy to use as an over-the-counter pregnancy test. Unlike current rapid response tests which rely on testing antibodies, Ticea utilized a technique known as isothermic nucleic acid amplification, making it possible to detect the virus as early as one week after infection. The disposable device does not rely on electricity, provides results in under one hour and should cost less than $5.00 to produce.
âNicoleâs work really made me realize what a big difference a fast easy-to-administer test for early stage HIV infection could make in prolonging, if not saving, thousands of lives in developing countries,â said Gursev Anmole, the graduate student mentor who assisted Nicole on her research at Simon Fraser University.
Ticea was recently awarded the 2015 Intel Foundation Young Scientist Award for her groundbreaking work. After starting her own company, she received a $100,000 grant to continue developing this technology in the hopes of bringing it to low-income communities in need.
This is amazing!
Yes for women doing groundbreaking shit! Yes for YOUNG women bettering the world! Yes for Canadian women! YES FOR WOMEN IN SCIENCES!!! YAAASSSSSSS!!!!
GIRLS IN STEM. Saving lives!
You go, Nicole Ticea. 4 for you, Nicole Ticea!!
Without the right to life, all other rights are meaningless!
It blows my mind how I see so many pro-choice people saying âIâm not pro-abortion, Iâm just pro-people having a choiceâ etcâŠ
and Iâm like âI disagree⊠but I get it.â
Yet they canât begin to grasp the concept that weâre not âPro-forced-pregnancyâ⊠Weâre just pro-unborn humans having a chance at life.Â
â Weâre just pro-unborn humans having a chance at life. â - So, forced pregnancy. Because to give the fetus priority, you are valuing the life of the mother as less deserving of her choice and HER life. You are valuing something that is not even sentient yet instead of a thinking, feeling individual who must deal with the repercussions of birth physically emotionally and mentally.
You can try prettying up your worlds all you want, but your base message is that a potential life is more valuable than an actual one, and thatâs disgusting. Keep your opinions of what others do with their body to yourself.
Youâre clearly proving what I just saidâŠYou donât want to be shown as an abortion lover yet you donât get that we donât âloveâ the idea of forcing someone to be pregnant. Of course not. But there are very few ways to make sure both humans have their right to life preserved.
And I value them equallyâŠSeriously⊠Wanting both to live is not a lack of compassion for one its just equal compassion fir both human LIVES⊠Iâm tired of the assumption that nit letting one kill another means that I donât care about the first.
Itâs not a potential life itâs just a younger lifeâŠNo experience but those experiences and that future have already been set their for them⊠and Iâm fighting for their right to live as well as to prove the pretty simple notion that a preborn human is NOT a part of someone elseâs body.
I need some coffee.
âItâs not a potential life itâs just a younger lifeâ YES. SCIENCE. YES.Â
*:ă»ïŸâ§ fun facts about pro-life feminism â§ă»ïŸ:*
I think all of our team members would identify themselves as feminists... and we stand for peace and ALL life!
In which John contemplates what it means to be human, and how we define personhood, while also talking a bit about the stuff he's been trying to write the la...
John Green gets so close! Let's help him out... go to the original YT vid & let him know your thoughts!
What makes us human and what makes us persons are two different questions. "Humanity" is our nature as members, individuals of the species homo sapiens -- it is nearly scientific, based in DNA. "Personhood," contrariwise, has been under much debate over the course of human history -- and at times has been used to advance human rights, at others to deprive human beings of human rights. Think of the dehumanization of slavery, genocide -- and even abortion: all consequences of dehumanization of certain classes of human beings.
Is it not enough to insist that being human is sufficient for being a human? John seems, in part, to get this: he agrees that the capability to read or to understand or tell stories is wrong because there are human beings with severe disabilities who could never participate in them, but they are still persons.
What do you think?
âSomeone else always has to carry on the story.â ~J.R.R. Tolkien, The Fellowship of the Ring
Amelia gives a persuasive speech on abortion for her Intro to Speech class
Confessions of a âpro-lifeâ geek.
There is a problem with the pro-life movement and using movies, books and tv shows to make arguments. Donât get me wrong, I used to do this very thing. If a movie literally involved saving a baby or mentioned abortion, I would slap a label on it as âpro-life.â If a movie came out touting itself as pro-life, I would support it whole-heartedly. Now, this is a well-meaning mindset. I mean we love the powerful imagery of a young life being saved but I think we need to really explain what it looks like when pro-lifers use works of fiction as points of discussion. Take for example the movie Juno. When I first saw Juno, I was so excited! It was about a teenager who opted NOT to choose abortion in a difficult circumstance. But it was a turning point for me. Through talking to other people, both pro-life and pro-choice, I realized this was short-sighted and misguided. This movie was not about choosing life. It was really about a girl who is forced to grow up very fast and how life can be confusing for all people. Adults are just as clueless as teenagers and they donât have things all figured out. Thatâs not really a pro-life movie but that also is my point. We really donât want to make âpro-lifeâ movies. As pro-lifers, the meaningful discussions we have are in light of works of fiction that make us think about the principles that make us âpro-life.â These principles include the dignity of the human person, the mercy given to someone who may or may not deserve it, and hope amidst troubling circumstances. We love Doctor Who for the uniqueness of the humans the doctor comes across and the moral dilemmas he and his companion face to save not only human life but humanity itself. We love the Lord of The Rings because even the most unlikely of people (this includes elves, ents, hobbits, dwarves, etc) can be heroic, loving and peaceful all the while STILL being imperfect. We love the Walking Dead because it really makes us consider what makes someone human, how do we preserve our conscience in a quickly changing world and shows what humans are capable of, violence and honor. I could go on and on. Fiction is the key to the imagination but it also is the key to accessing the heart and truly plumbing what we believe. This allows us to have discussions, as pro-lifers, with people who may not share our view. It isnât to be used as ammunition to fire back at the other side. Itâs a bridge. That is what this page is about. We are not here to stake claim on fandoms for our own personal beliefs. We want to learn, discuss and change hearts through our mutual love of the spectacular nerdy world of movies, tv shows, and books. - Lisa
The Quality of Mercy: Death Isn't The Answer
Pro-lifers often find it consistent to be against many anti-life issues apart from abortion, such as assisted suicide, embryonic stem cell research, and domestic homicide to name a few. But thereâs one major hot-button issue that pro-lifers are often divided on: The death penalty. By all means, there is legitimate support for both pro-death penalty and anti-death penalty stances, but as consistent pro-lifers, such an issue should be taken with great consideration. Some great insight on this matter is offered a few times in J.R.R. Tolkienâs The Lord of the Rings.
        âWhat a pity that Bilbo did not stab that vile creature, when he had a chance!â Frodo states in The Fellowship of the Ring, after Gandalf has explained Gollumâs history to him. Gandalf then replies, âPity? It was Pity that stayed his hand. Pity, and Mercy: not to strike without need. And he has been well rewarded, Frodo. Be sure that he took so little hurt from the evil, and escaped in the end, because he began his ownership of the Ring so. With Pity.â (Emphasis mine.) Bilbo was well-aware that Gollum had every intention of killing him when he found the Ring. And once he was invisible by the Ringâs power, he had the perfect opportunity to end the evil of Gollum. He could have killed him, yet he did not. Despite him being at the very beginning of his bondage to the Ring, the mercy in his heart overcame, and he let him live. And while people guilty of crimes such as murder by no means should be walked away from, what does killing them when it is not a direct situation of self-defense or defending someone else who cannot defend her or himself accomplish? Is it truly a form of punishment, or is it vengeance? As Frodo later says in The Return of the King, âIt is useless to meet revenge with revenge: It will heal nothing.â
        Faramir further reiterates a merciful mindset in The Two Towers as he is explaining to Frodo that he does not wish for the glory of a warrior, but he instead wishes for peace: âWar must be, while we defend our lives against a destroyer who would devour all; but I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend: the city of the Men of NĂșmenor[.]â In this conversation, Faramir clarifies that sometime defense is necessary, but lusting for blood is futile. Throughout his introduction in this chapter (The Window on the West) and in his later appearances, Tolkien portrays Faramir as the embodiment of an uncorrupted Manâthe species most prone to corruption in Arda. He continually proves himself to be a person who would lead out of necessity rather than lust for power, even to the point of telling Frodo he would not take the Ring knowing its power could lead to seeming victory against the Enemy.  He embodies resistance to evil, to the extent he does not thirst for blood when alternatives are available. And in the real world, we have life sentences to solitary confinement. As Tolkien continually stressed, death doesnât have to be the answer if there is another option available.
        In The Return of the King, Beregond is charged with treason for leaving his post, and spilling blood in the Hallows of the stewards of Gondor. Though former laws of Gondor would have demanded the death penalty, Aragorn rejects giving him this doom because his actions were to protect Faramir, his superior. But even though Beregondâs actions were for good, Aragorn also pardoned the Easterlings who surrendered themselves and granted them freedom, despite their former service to Sauron. In these instances, Aragorn had good faith that those he pardoned were indeed remorseful of their actions, and refused to have them put to death. Though in reality such pardons would be near impossible, the example of Aragorn does show that those who have done wrong donât have to be put to death.
        Before the conclusion of the story, Tolkien demonstrates a mindset of mercy yet again when the four Hobbits return to the Shire to find Saruman has taken over, and that many hobbits have joined him. Despite this dark turn, Frodo prohibits his friends from shedding blood. âBut remember: there is to be no slaying of hobbits, not even if they have gone over to the other side. Really gone over, I mean; not just obeying ruffiansâ orders because they are frightened. No hobbit has ever killed another on purpose in the Shire, and it is not to begin now. And nobody is to be killed at all, if it can be helped.â This is a drastic change from Frodo before his journey, who believed it would have been just to kill Gollum even when he was helpless. After being pushed to the edge of life and death, nearly giving in to the evil of the Ring, and knowing that for some of the things he had done some would say he deserved to die, yet he had been shown mercy by Sam. Because of this, Frodo now is able to appreciate the quality of mercy and extend it to others.
        The death penalty is a difficult topic, and unlike in the killing of innocents, thereâs no easy answer to whether itâs ever justifiable or not. And especially for pro-lifers, we cannot disregard this issue or ignore it. And although Tolkien was not recognized as a philosopher, his works do offer excellent insight that we all should consider.
âDo I have the Right?â Â Genesis of the Daleks and the Right to Life
One of the most celebrated episodes in Doctor Who's long history is the 1975 gem âGenesis of the Daleksâ, which turns 40 today. Â While being transmatted back to the TARDIS, The Doctor and his companions Sarah and Harry are intercepted by the Time Lords, who send them to the Dalek home planet Skaro on a mission to prevent the Daleks, the most feared and destructive creatures in the universe, from ever evolving in the first place. Â The Doctor is given three options: to prevent the evolutionary development of the Daleks, to turn them into a force for good rather than evil, or to destroy them once and for all.
But as things go from bad to worse, The Doctor slowly starts losing options to choose from. Â For he has arrived too late, and the Kaled scientist Davros has already invented the Dalek casing and weapons, and has begun the process of speeding up his species' evolution to a form that will become the Daleks' organic material. Â With help from Sarah and Harry, he teams up with a dissenting group of Davros' scientists who object to the removal of the Dalek's conscience, and manage to convince the Kaled government to halt Dalek production while an investigation is made. Â But Davros' response to the government's ultimatum is to assist the Kaleds' enemies in war with wiping out the entire Kaled city with a nuclear warhead. Â Losing his first two options, the Doctor decides he has but one option left for his mission: total genocide of the Dalek species.
The scene where the Doctor and Sarah debate over whether he has the right to kill is one of my favorite scenes in all of science fiction. Â It is praised by many fans for its display of nonviolence against even something so terribly evil. Â But one thing that many don't realize or think about as much is the age of the beings the Doctor is talking aboutâhe is refusing to kill preborn Daleks! Â The Daleks he is debating over the right to kill are called âembryosâ multiple times throughout the six-part epic. Â Even after the second more recent pro-life episode, I still consider this the most pro-life moment in the entire 50-year series. Â While every so often pro-choicers will attempt to use the fact that Adolf Hitler was nearly aborted as an argument for the extermination of whichever preborn children they view as undeserving of life, the Doctor has a better answer. Â He points out to his companions that many different people and civilizations in the future will become friends and allies out of mutual fear of the Daleks, similar to how The Third Reich's crimes against humanity united many of Earth's nations in a common cause during World War II. Â And while the preborn Daleks in the incubation room are eventually killed near the end, it is not by the Doctor's hands but by a Dalek, which fires on the Doctor whenever he would try to do it himself, a symbol that evil will continue to kill its own at a level good people must never stoop to, lest they become the same villain they fight. Â The answer to any choice involving a violent outcome is to refuse to choose, a statement Feminists For Life has adopted as their prime philosophy. Â In the final spoken line of the episode, when asked by Sarah why he seems so positive when he failed his mission, the Doctor responds with life-affirming optimism: âFailed? Â Not really. Â You see, although I know the Daleks will create havoc and destruction for millions of years, I also know that out of their evil must come something good.â Â In the end, the nonviolent choice will bring a positive end.