Thousands of Thousands

Also called "Millions" time doesn't exist but boardgames do. im like if Shinoa was a sister of battle. 31 she/her. internet name is Plasma. Crowley Eusford deserved better. Bi Transbian Tomboy.

[trans-girl-nausicaa]

Hopefully tumblr doesn't mangle this via its compression algorithm. I have scanned and composited this map from its two page spread in the box set of the manga.

Bonus images:

Map detail:

Dorok footsoldiers:

[princessrhcenyra]

BOBS' BURGERS ⇢ 3x03 | BOB FIRES THE KIDS

[ape-of-naples]

lmao

[ape-of-naples]

come on

[maxknightley]

"of course this is a valid historical source. it says 'this happened' right there at the top of the page."

[pixiecatsupreme]

This is really funny considering the bible was retranslated multiple times before being translated to English

[jingerpi]

well many modern translations use much earlier versions to source their translation - it's not exactly a game of telephone once we have the written record, though the written record we do have starts some time after the actual events depicted so yeah there is a decent gap. still though, it's funny for a lot of reasons

1. it's just not true, there's other more reliable accounts from the time period

2. the Bible is written by a lot of different people with different levels of credibility. a lot of the attributed authors are also wrong, and many are written by someone other than the claimed author

3. some of the books that claim to be written by different authors as evidence to multiple eyewitness testimonies (the gospels), are actually so similar in account, scholars generally agree that there was another single source (called Q) which they all drew from instead

4. entirely ignores that the Bible claims dead people can come back to life and that divine beings are real, among other things. if even a modern text claimed this we would probably dismiss it because of how absurd and unlikely it is. even if the Bible were relatively reliable otherwise, the claims it makes are not remotely comparable to other historical accounts which recount you know, normal stuff that we see happen regularly

[thejediexile]

I would like to mention with the possible exception of the gospel of John, the weird one, none of them claim to be written by any specific person, let alone an eyewitness. And john claims to have a source that is the nameless Beloved Disciple thats not in any other gospel..

A good example of why Matthew the apostle didn't write the gospel that has his name is that gMatt plagarizes the scene where Jesus calls Matthew word for word from Marks gospel...who church tradition even says isnt an eye witness. The successively written gospels knew each other but also kinda assumed to be writing over each other, like when Luke corrects Marks prediction of the siege of Jerusalem or giving Herod the incorrect title.

Isaiah is written by 2 or 3 different people writing at different times and from different perspectives within the book, but apologists and fundamentalists ignore that. Or the 6 letters claimed to be written by Paul but almost certainly were not.

Very rarely is the bible proveably correct on historical events but it does show how a specific society viewed its history. Also like...some parts are clearly written as stories or polemical myths and apologists will ignore what the text says in favor of what they want it to say. Like, anyone who says sodoms sin was homosexuality literally did not read the story and doesn't care what the bible says, just how they can use it.

Anyway yeah the bible says Pontious Pilate was real so its all true, even the stuff that contradicts the other stuff...

[ape-of-naples]

lmao

[ape-of-naples]

come on

[maxknightley]

"of course this is a valid historical source. it says 'this happened' right there at the top of the page."

[pixiecatsupreme]

This is really funny considering the bible was retranslated multiple times before being translated to English

[jingerpi]

well many modern translations use much earlier versions to source their translation - it's not exactly a game of telephone once we have the written record, though the written record we do have starts some time after the actual events depicted so yeah there is a decent gap. still though, it's funny for a lot of reasons

1. it's just not true, there's other more reliable accounts from the time period

2. the Bible is written by a lot of different people with different levels of credibility. a lot of the attributed authors are also wrong, and many are written by someone other than the claimed author

3. some of the books that claim to be written by different authors as evidence to multiple eyewitness testimonies (the gospels), are actually so similar in account, scholars generally agree that there was another single source (called Q) which they all drew from instead

4. entirely ignores that the Bible claims dead people can come back to life and that divine beings are real, among other things. if even a modern text claimed this we would probably dismiss it because of how absurd and unlikely it is. even if the Bible were relatively reliable otherwise, the claims it makes are not remotely comparable to other historical accounts which recount you know, normal stuff that we see happen regularly

[suspiriously]

this time i’m really gonna do it

[psipudding]

[yamada-ryo]

yamada ryo

[transparent-plastic-robotgirl]

reblog to absolutely bap prev to death with your paws

[creatureactivist]

Can we just stay like this for a while?

[nitrobishop]

[agpsoundsystem]

[videolottery]

Someone should make a disco elysium spiritual successor that takes place in a maze and follows a protagonist who has to eat all the dots in the maze whilst avoiding several ghosts

[dragongirlbunny]

you can actually homebrew this in d&d 5e

[griffonatrix]

SCROLL UP!!! THIS IS A PAINTING

[redavexat]

[emotargaryen]

one of the tweets of all time to me

[1794]

mustard snob canon

[archivesoftheapes]

[iahtruong]

[yamada-ryo]

Here. Take these. You'll need them.

[s-lycopersicum]

[yamada-ryo]

no!!!

[theehorsepusssy]