The Media Milennial
Every day for the past two weeks Iāve approached my parents and asked them if they got a letter from Berkeley in the mail. Ten years ago, this would have made sense; a student anxiously awaiting her admissions decision was normal. Today, though, it seems arbitrary. I already know Iāve been accepted. Iām forced to admit that my primary motivation for the constant badgering and snail mail investigation is aimed not at personal achievement but at social sharing-- Iād rather Instagram a paper letter than a screenshot off of my gmail account.
We are the children of the social media generation. While I like to think that Iām above the influence of lowly popularity monitors like Facebook, Twitter, and instagram, I know Iām not. I spend much of my day refreshing three different news feeds, checking for activity, likes, follows. I know itās trivial, but I often drain my phoneās battery by the time the bell rings at 2:50 to signify the end of my school day. While that may send a strong message about my dedication to my academics, it also indicates to me that Iāve been swallowed up by the social media monster, and once youāre inside, itās difficult, if not impossible, to escape.
While many writers, looking at the two paragraphs above, may continue this post in criticism of our technological Millennium, I donāt think thereās any use in combatting progress. Rather, Iād like to focus on a small detail of our transition into fabricated narcissism: itās impact on our lives and, specifically, its impact on our abilities to communicate.
Iāll begin with an example. In the past few months since Iāve adopted an active twitter account, Iāve been spectator to countless ātwit-fights,ā quick-witted 160 character insults that often result in more harm than drawn-out in-person speeches. These twit-fights, which are captured in a moment by a screenshot, may seem trivial; however, Twitter is a networking site that bridges generations, people, and places. Principals on campus have tracked students on twitter and held them accountable for things said online. People in another country have felt offended by an off-handed comment a SoCal kid posted on his feed. Ironically, while ink on paper is much more permanent, the dots on a screen, easily deleted or restructured, are often more indelible.
The consequences of words written in pixels on a screen arenāt temporary or immediate, as they used to be when conflict arose. Instead, they ripple out like waves across a current of negativity, rumors, confusion, and mistrust. We never used to believe what we saw online; when I was younger, my parents told me the internet wasnāt a resource I could depend on for hard facts. Nowadays, though, the internet is the basis for our facts, our perceptions, and our understandings of human nature. Weāve converted a ramshackle compilation of homemade recipes into a dictionary for human discovery, and weāre heading down a path from which there is no return.


















