Devil's Triad Chocolate Collection

No title available
Misplaced Lens Cap

oozey mess
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year

ellievsbear

No title available
Cosimo Galluzzi

blake kathryn

izzy's playlists!

roma★
Monterey Bay Aquarium
Cosmic Funnies
TVSTRANGERTHINGS

Love Begins
untitled
Xuebing Du
$LAYYYTER
cherry valley forever
RMH
KIROKAZE
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from Türkiye
seen from United States

seen from Ukraine
seen from Bangladesh

seen from Spain

seen from South Africa

seen from Malaysia

seen from Türkiye
seen from Syria

seen from Azerbaijan

seen from Canada
seen from Singapore
seen from Bangladesh

seen from Russia
seen from Venezuela
seen from Chile

seen from Iraq
seen from United Kingdom
@thepleaofsuchsuch
Devil's Triad Chocolate Collection
🌈✨✨
fashion details:
pretty
from the warframe wiki 🫡
the image of him ready to throw down with his kids and then leaving immediately once Jade enters the room was so funny to me that I had to draw it
there are good days and bad days, in good days happy for 2 hours depressed for the rest in bad days its just simply hell. lmao. What a life
One of the reasons I find Doflamingo so fascinating is the feeling of destroyed potential. Like, when I look at him, I can see the ghost of the great and good man he could’ve been: loyal, smart, determined, charismatic, good with children, forgiving mistakes and caring about his family… He has all those qualities, all the potential, but it was completely twisted and warped by his upbringing. At first, unintentionally - via the awful culture of Mary Geoise and the disastrous situation when he was hunted down by the people around him, with his parents unfit to help or deal with the circumstances in any way. And then - deliberately: through Trebol and the gang’s grooming and encouraging of Doflamingo’s worst sides.
Doflamingo is a terrifying villain, but he’s also tragic - because I can almost see the good person he could have been. Not perfect, not a flawless paragon - but a genuinely caring man. A brother who shared food with Rosi, a son who tried to help his mother, a captain who accepted people regardless of their looks, character flaws, or prejudice. And this is what makes him so unnerving, I think: because in him, I can see how anything good or genuine in any of us can be destroyed beyond repair.
But the most moving part about Doffy is that he isn't beyond repair. One could even say that he has partially repaired himself already. For example, just take a look at his affection towards his adopted children. And before anyone says Doffy only adopt children to use them, the plot actually proved otherwise, because none of his children were useful. They literally won 0 fights, but Doffy never blame them for failing. No verbal threats, no physical harm, no consequence.
Not to mention Doffy never brings them to do truly dangerous work in the first place. Doffy never let his elder and younger family members come near when he's working as a Warlord. Even before Doffy killed Rosinante, Doffy still ordered the children (Buffalo and Baby-5) to go away.
As for Law, the complications escalate. Because the story is narrated from Law and Luffy's POV, the audience often forgets that Doffy literally fulfilled Rosinante's last wish. Rosinante wanted Law to be free, and Doffy listened.
Doffy said he forgave Rosi's betrayal after the fratricide and he meant it. For thirteen years he never laid a finger on Law. He let Law roam free, just like Rosi would have wanted. When Law trashed his assets on Sabaody he simply ignored the damage, just like he always ignored Baby-5's assassination attempts at him.
In contrast, Croc tried to murder useless Baroque members, Judge experimented on his own children's genes, Kaido chained his, Linlin ate hers.
And even when Law made it very clear that he wanted Doflamingo dead, Doffy still hesitated. He would shoot Law with a gun. Then he would save Law's life from killers like Kelly and Bobby Funk. He would smile at Law's pain. Then he would twist into a grimace, triggered by the pitiful memory of younger Law's miserable little face.
In short, he was deeply, painfully, self-consciously self-contradictory.
Such contradiction is what makes Doffy unique. He has many layers. He wears too many masks, plays way too many characters at the same time: son of Homing, brother of Rosi, adopted child of Trebol, leader of pirates, de facto father of Dellinger, Baby-5 & Sugar etc, King of Dressrosa, slaveowning merchant serving both illegal and legal entities, villain in Law and Luffy's adventure, victim of the people's righteous rage, a cog in the Mary Geoise imperial machine just like other Warlords and marines, as well as a crack in the imperial order just like his father. All these masks have contradictory plot demands. And he failed at performance to no one's surprise.
So, despite Doffy constantly being misinterpreted as a typical Celestial Dragon, in light of recent Elbaf chapters, it is ironically clear that Doffy is already irrevocably re-educated by Homing and could never amount to true Mary Geoise monstrosity like Gunko, Sommers and Shamrock.
Doffy isn't racist enough, isn't cruel to children enough, isn't authoritarian enough. He's still evil, but he wasn't even good at it, and could never thoroughly enjoy it like other true celestials do. He's stuck between being a human and being a monster, a middle man through and through.
andor really is like "there's a war to fight and the galaxy is horrible and we're following the story of a man who's doomed to burn what's left of his life for the rebellion, but the normal things like meeting your partner's mother who neither of you like and being in a weird stage with your girlfriend and missing your lover and attending a wedding will still happen either way" and you know what? i love that. it really puts the whole range of human experience on screen and in perspective. there's a war to fight and there's dishes to wash and there's a wedding to attend and there's work to be done. just because one thing starts doesn't mean the others stop. its overwhelming and vaguely uncomfortable to see all strung together, but all those things do happen all at once in the real world too. in real life they're just not carefully edited in an order that's designed to tell a story
Yeah the romance in Warframe 1999 is great and all but fuck have you considered the lore we are getting? And I by that I mean, actually having character motivations and exploration centre stage and explored in depth, followed by total fucking clownery tidbits. The absolute bullshit and shenanigans we are getting alongside some of the most heart wrenching reframings of the Drifter’s trauma and experiences?
Albrecht dragged an 8 foot tall bird into the future just to dip it in hell, also the Drifter thinks everyone loves the Operator more than them. Lotus, Ordis, fuck maybe that’s the only reason Teshin ever trained them?
Lettie named her nice rats after beloved friends, and her naughty rat after an ancient war god, and also Drifter hasn’t left 1999. It’s implied they could. They choose to stay because they don’t feel they belong back in the Origin System and never did.
Despite struggles with isolation and depression, Eleanor strives even to see the upsides of being infested every day, such as being able to jerk off with her tongue. Drifter grew up alongside Dominus Thrax and their friends in Duviri, playing every day, but then they grew up, and one day, probably after a slow and torturous build up, Thrax finally killed them for the first of countless times.
Quincy still has his dick, thank god for him. Drifter made the same choice as the Operator, to take the Man in the Wall’s hand, but instead it abandoned Drifter and merely saved, “them,” all the other Tenno, just as it said. Condemned to solitude through an unknowable entity’s arbitrary fucking games and wordplay. On a child.
We thought we’d be trauma healing the Hex this update but no actually, this is just Drifter’s first chance to talk to someone that isn’t their ~10 year old self and their mother about this.
and also the whole "Drifter to 1999 thing" is because Lotus not willing to risk the Operator. The Operator is Lotus's precious child and Drifter is ..., well, her champion
returning to the orbiter now is just
would love to know why the cops keep releasing photos and information about the uhc shooter, because what we've learned:
attractive
smart
rich — but a class traitor
no criminal history
by all accounts a good person
killed the one person he intended to kill and no one else
grievance that's both personal (his botched back surgery + family member illness) and ideological (fuck the healthcare industry)
politics are a weird mix of both right and left, so republicans can't call him a crazy liberal
concise, well-articulated manifesto
seemingly got caught on purpose, or at the very least was not caught by actual police work, and furthermore insulted the police
like? how are these things supposed to make me feel less sympathetic towards the guy?
I’m thinking about Wicked tonight, specifically why Elphaba ends up with Fiyero instead of Glinda in the musical despite Elphaba and Glinda having the more well-rounded relationship.
You could chalk it up to the writers wanting a heteronormative ending (and I’m certain that’s part of it) or the fact that Elphaba and Fiyero had a love affair in the book. But I think there’s a bit more nuance to it.
The whole point of Glinda’s character is that she upholds the status quo of Oz. No matter how much she loves Elphaba or sympathizes with the plight of the Animals, she will always align herself with the current system and those in power. And as long as that remains the case, a relationship between her and Elphaba is futile because Elphaba will not give up her cause.
Elphaba and Glinda represent to different ends of a spectrum. Elphaba resists the oppressive forces in Oz, while Glinda upholds them. But Fiyero is somewhere in the middle. He starts out privileged and carefree like Glinda, but quickly turns to Elphaba’s side. He does become Captain of the Guard, but only to find Elphaba and help her evade arrest.
And therein lies the difference between Glinda and Fiyero as love interests to Elphaba. Glinda would never sacrifice her title as “the Good Witch” and all her power granted from the Wizard, even if it meant helping Elphaba. Fiyero, on the other hand, does give up his privilege, his title, and even his human form for Elphaba. Glinda clings to what the status quo gives her, while Fiyero ultimately rejects it.
Yes, the writing around Elphaba and Fiyero’s romance is a bit rushed and doesn’t have the same gradual development that Elphaba and Glinda have. And yes, I have no doubt heteronormativity played a role in giving Elphaba a male love interest in the end. But I see a lot of people write off Fiyero and his relationship with Elphaba and I just don’t agree.
Why does Elphaba end up with Fiyero instead of Glinda? Because Fiyero makes the sacrifices that Glinda wasn’t willing to.
Does "Wicked" (the musical) advocate working "within the system" to make socio-political changes rather than rebelling against the system?
Yes
No
It leaves the question unanswered
Spoilers for Wicked: Part 2 below, for people who have only seen the film version.
I just came across a post defending Glinda (one of many I've seen lately; I've seen more defenses of her than I have the criticisms they're defending her from), which argued that the musical advocates working to make changes from within the system rather than rebelling and becoming an outlaw. Elphaba's rebellion achieves nothing but disaster for herself and her loved ones, while Glinda's choice to curry favor with the Wizard is what gives her the power in the end to make the changes Elphaba failed to make. If Glinda had gone with Elphaba in "Defying Gravity" (this argument goes), they would have both become public enemies and both been either arrested or murdered without achieving anything; far from being a great moral failure, Glinda's choice is what saves the land of Oz in the end.
But is "don't fight the system, work for change within it" really the point the musical intends to make? Does this show, which seems so geared toward the marginalized and the outcasts of the world, really preach such a centrist message?
Or is it ambiguous? Are we meant to decide for ourselves whether Glinda should have gone with Elphaba in "Defying Gravity," or whether Elphaba should have made choices more like Glinda's instead?
I'd like to know what other people think.
The story is never ambiguous about Glinda's utter lack of care for Animal rights, so it depends on which side the audience is on. I wasn't very moved by the musical when both Glinda and Elphaba were played by white women, but the movie casts Cynthia as Elphaba, which greatly alters my experience.
Now, the story goes like this: a white liberal girl promises to make a poc popular, but never delivers that promise, mainstream Ozian still hates that poc; said poc naively believes the head of an imperialist state will be morally good enough to improve Animal rights, and gets authoritarian oppression instead; said liberal girl gains fame and status during political chaos, but once again nothing is done about Animal rights and that particular poc's rights; a genuine white leftist tried to help said poc and lost everything, especially his human-passing form; at the end of the day the poc + white leftist couple have to leave the country, while said liberal remains human and the rest of Ozians are still bathing in lies.
So I don't see much ambiguity here. The story is very, very clear about the horrifying consequences of believing in liberalism and centrism for oppressed groups - even only believing a tiny bit could bring devastating results. If Dr.Dillamond has no illusion about Ozian racism and the nature of Ozian ruling class, he could have fled earlier, just like the snow leopard and the birds. But he stayed too long and was caught instead. If Elphaba has no illusion about Ozian racism and the nature of Ozian ruling class, then she would not go to The Emerald City in the first place. She tried to work within the system, but the system won't work with her.
However, the system works for Glinda, the white liberal who doesn't cross the line. Because if you cross it then you'll end up like Fiyero. But for Elphaba and the Animals, the system had never worked in the first place.
Therefore, in the end, Elphaba said nothing to Glinda, because Elphaba realized she cannot trust Glinda with the truth. Not only is believing in the system extremely dangerous, believing in Glinda also objectively does nothing good for Elphaba and other minority rights (mind you, Glinda didn't just lie to Ozian masses, she also lied and manipulated Boq and Nessa's relationship; things went disastrous for the couple, but Glinda herself was once again unharmed). That's literally the plot - centrism only works for a very, very limited group of people. If you are outside of that group and still have faith in liberalism, then you are doomed.
Jury Nullification: Your Power To Choose