Disaster Asexual ⢠Neurospicy Harbinger of Chaos - Prolific Writer & Occasional Artist. - Tragic victim of the Good Omens to Formula 1 pipeline - Find my AO3 and other socials in the pinned post
SquidgeWorld Archive acts as a backup for most of my works on AO3. Crossposting my back log of works currently in progress.
Socials:
Reddit: theRavenMuse666
Bluesky: theRavenMuse
Discord: theRavenMuse
(I am no longer on Insta and only rarely on FB.)
Discord servers:
The Rainbow Road to F1 Pipeline
(Owned by me) A server for Good Omens fans of Formula 1 racing! We chat about Rainbow Road, other Good Omens racing fics, and watch live Formula 1 events together.
GOmegaverse
(Modded by me) A server for GO fans of omegaverse. General discussion on all things omegaverse. We also have a formal book club and guess the author events.
The Garden of Eden
(Modded by me) General GO server. Itâs a big server but very friendly.
Good Omens Discord Server Directory
(Maintained by me.) This includes various Good Omens discord servers with various purposes. Contact me if you have a server that should be added.
tbh my biggest problem with go3 is that aziraphale and crowley do stuff that affects the plot and actually makes a difference in the story #notmygoodomens. my ineffables do NOT save the world, they are there while the world is saved
youâve taken the two most useless beings in existence and you made them make a decision. look at them. theyâre suicidal now
David Tennent on if Crowley âgot everything he wanted in the endâ: âNo. He was evaporated. And then someone who looked a bit like him met someone who looked a bit like Aziraphale, but it's not the same thing.â
Fans clinging to Fellony being Aziracrow: its AI! Itâs taken out of context! David doesnât know what heâs talking about!
David is one of very few people who actually read the script. And the only one other than Michael (who also referred to the ending using the word âanihilationâ) to comment on what actually happened. If you still want to cling to strings of hope that somehow twist this into a happy ending, thatâs fine, but stop with the accusations that those of us who actually interpreted the ending as it was shown to us on screen AND how both of the actors have told us it is are somehow making it up. Weâre not. Weâre just refusing to play mind games with ourselves to twist it into something it wasnât meant to be. Thatâs what fanfiction is for, not canon.
Everyone passionately defending the em dash from being stolen completely by AI has also had the side effect of teaching me that Iâve been using it wrong. I was doing this - with a normal-sized dash and spaces between - rather than the larger dash with no spaces. So thatâs cool I guess
it's actually called em dash because it's meant to be the width of an M. There's also an n dash which is meant to be the width of an N.
normal dash is for in-between words, like in in-between!
n dash is usually for numbers, like when you're saying, "I did 4â7 things today."
m dash is for interjecting a sentence to add contextâextra information or thoughts and lists of thingsâwithout making said context seem less important than the rest of the sentence (which would be the case with brackets).
on mobile keyboards, you can usually hold down on the dash to make the other dashes appear
like so.
and while it's not incorrect to use em dashes with a space before and after the dash â this definitely done in published writing too! â it's less common than using it without those spaces, especially online.
I intentionally use spaces with my em dashes because I find it much easier to read that way. Much less likely to mistake it for an en dash at a quick glance.
i think the key difference between george lucasâs star wars and disneyâs star wars is that lucas is a man with an ideology. someone with a point of view, and all that entails. which comes with ideas of revolution, anti-imperialism, challenging the status quo, cultural appropriation and racist stereotypes. complex and contradictory ideas because thatâs how artists are: complex and complicated people. disney is not. disney is a corporation. a corporation canât have ideology, because ideology defeats the purpose of profit. and when the only thing you do is to turn on the movie manufacturing machine before you sit down and plan what ideas are you trying to convey to the audience, then your results are going to be washed out corporate garbage. and because when youâre a giant corporation who only cares about selling to the widest audience possible, you canât take sides. you canât decide on an idea. because you want to sell your product to people who are on the entire political spectrum. which results in movies without ideology, without purpose, without soul.
I have been looking for this post for years after I came across it and itâs finally here and I need to reblog this because it is absolutely and entirely accurate.
#as I always say: lucas was making a samurai film and a ww2 flying ace film and a western film and adding laser swords#because he fundamentally LIKED samurai films and dambusters films and westerns and 40âs adventure serials#but disney are making a âstar wars filmâ and adding nothing because it already had laser swords and they have nothing else to say#xerox of a xerox baybeeeee (via harrietvane)
it starting to make more sense as to why disney canceled swtcw. like âA SHOW THAT SHOWS CONFLICTING IDEALS BETWEEN PPL AND THE CRUELTY OF WAR??? OH GOD WE CANT SHOW THAT ALL OUR SHOWS MUST HAVE A BLAND LESSON ABT âFRIENDSHIPââ
this was one of the most heartbreaking things for me in the finale. crowley beibg soft and loving to a plan. and a plant that looks like shit on top of that even
Messing About, Stacking the Deck, and Free Will - Why the themes of Good Omens Season 3 Worked for me
Hey all, it's been a bit of a rough time for us, hasn't it? I really enjoyed the finale, compromises, heartbreak, and all. I don't want this to come off as scolding or telling anyone they are wrong to feel the way they do, or that they don't 'get it,' because the finale allows for a multitude of valid and contradictory readings. But I haven't seen too many people talking about the things I've been mulling over for several days now?
I think part of the divide here is cultural, philosophical, religious, etc. Like, we're over here as a fandom trying to settle the longstanding question of Predetermination vs Free Will (among other things) in the space of four ten days!!! These are NOT trivial questions being brought to the fore!
It's been so interesting too, to see people so split on whether this ending is a Pratchett ending or not. There is also a divide on whether it is true to the themes of the book and the show* and I have to say........ yes???
It is, at the very least, explicitly engaging with the text of the book and the show--a lot of the dialogue at the end is in the book itself!!--and I can see how you could tease out these ideas in a hypothetical sequel and come to where we ended up. Did we get the only or the best execution of these themes? Assuredly not. We certainly got a truncated, compromised execution of these ideas, and I can almost see the shape of where some of them could've branched out in a full season.
*The problem is that the text *is* so dense, and wide-reaching, and philosophical, and weird, and zany, is that S3 also *ABSOLUTELY* dropped other themes too. And Good Omens isn't just a few ideas!!
We have known for a long time that we were going to get a compromised product, but I'll tell you why S3 still worked for me.
This is quite long, so I will break this up into a few separate pieces.
I was really excited by season 2, I loved it, I think it is probably still my favorite? S2 E2 is perhaps the best television I've ever seen. And yes, season 2 focuses on the romance and relationship between Aziraphale and Crowley, but it also focuses on their relationship to *humans*.
The thing I was so excited about when season 2 first aired was in direct relation with something Adam says towards the end of the first book:
And after watching season 2 I was stoked!! "OH!! They're going to address that point in the final season!! I see now!!"
[Side note: I don't think it was wrong of them to drop this whole line of thought from the first season. The ending sequence works well enough without it, and it's not critically load bearing if S1 is a standalone product, and there's enough supernatural meddling to justify underlining it later, as they ended up doing.]
In Season 2 especially (though in S1 as well) we explicitly see *Crowley and Aziraphale* "messing people about, not just Heaven and Hell, but our beloved protagonists.
Crowley and Aziraphale "mess about" with Job and his family. Now they are being told to do it by their head offices, but they are "messing around" with Job. Explicitly for capricious, fickle whims between Satan and God, but messing about nonetheless! It's CRUEL, it's a cruel story in the Bible that has bedeviled scholars for thousands of years in the examining and interpreting thereof. What is the nature of God, does God contain Sin and Evil as part of being all things?? How can cruel things happen in a universe with a caring, loving God? Why does God allow bad things to happen to us? Can we do anything to appease God to end our suffering? It asks a lot of hard, hard questions of us, unfair ones in an unfair universe whether you believe God exists or not.
And the episode beautifully points all this out, and subverts the ending with quick thinking from our heroes. So it does, ultimately, have a happy end, but the misery Job and his family experienced was still real. They were still used for cheap entertainment for higher beings with far more power than they could ever hope to have.
There's also Elspeth and Wee Morag. By waffling on the complexity of human morals, Crowley and Aziraphale inadvertently end up getting Wee Morag killed. Elspeth's suicide attempt is averted by their actions (and presumably she goes and runs a farm and is good, given that Crowley gets dragged down to Hell for punishment) but that's still a high cost to pay, all around. All for 'messing about.' It's true, Crowley and Aziraphale are not perfect beings, they do make mistakes, they are like us, but far more powerful than us.
And of course, in the present day, they are using Maggie and Nina to try and fix a problem of their own making. They disregard the fact that Nina has a partner, and are doing their best matchmaker routine.
Now I say this as someone who enjoys Maggie/Nina and I hope that they went off into the sunset together after an appropriate amount of time for Nina to get herself sorted. Also, it's part of the premise! It's FUN to watch our angel and demon swan about and do ridiculous things and give people things they deserve or want. But...
Nina and Maggie take Crowley to task at the end of the season, right before the final fifteen. I don't see enough people talking about it.
Nina: "Where's the other one? We need to talk to you."
Crowley: "He's out. Not a good time."
Nina: "I wasn't asking. There are things you need to hear. You and your... partner *have been messing about in our lives*."
Maggie: "We're not a game. We're real people. You can't just pair us up for your amusement."
Nina even uses the same phrase! "Messing about!" It's SO important it's in the book 6 or 8 times in that final confrontation scene in some form or another.
And you can see in the book that Crowley takes it to heart quite quickly!!
And he's trying to impress that importance to his angel!
Crowley, the purported architect of Free Will (possibly, let's call it Schrodinger's Free Will for the moment), realizes he's been party to meddling in people's lives, and I don't think he cares for it.
And I think Adam's words to Anathema are critically important here for the final bit of groundwork for this theme. In the book she approaches him and tells him he could do all sorts of good things like saving the whales etc and Adam shuts her down:
I think this is crucial for understanding the ending of season 3. I think it is there in the text and subtext throughout the show to get there as well, though not stated quite so explicitly.
Aziraphale and Crowley are supernatural beings! Even without explicitly using miracles, they are often shown to influence reality around them, just from their expectations alone! A lot of what happens during *The Ball* was as eerie as it was fun, and I don't believe that Aziraphale is playing anyone like a puppeteer, but his hopes and expectations are so strong, they are clearing having a huge influence on the proceedings. We also see it in Season 3. Without its protector, Whickbur Street fell into a terrible state while our angel was gone.
Aside from the power of their expectations, they have been living their way with their powers for thousands of years, are they really going to let the mundanity of waiting for a reservation to open up at a fancy restaurant happen to them? Are they going to meekly submit to the parking meter enforcer? Again! We LOVE seeing them banish those mundanities, and it's part of the fun and the premise, but I can absolutely see the path to a hypothetical sequel novel where the narrative hooks them by the collar and says "No, actually, it's not okay for you two--or any supernatural entity--to have this much power over humanity! It's not fair!" And I can see the seeds for Crowley coming around to this thought with what Adam said/what Nina told him in season 2.
I have seen quite a few folks bemoaning the gambling subplot and complaining that it takes up too much time but, in my opinion, it is *thematically* load bearing, and you really can't remove it because it is the bridge between "messing about" and the question of Free Will.
Good Omens starts with the analogy of games of chance (the show borrows this essentially word-for-word):
God does not play dice with the universe; He plays an ineffable game of His own devising, which might be compared, from the perspective of any of the other players,* to being involved in an obscure and complex version of poker in a pitch-dark room, with blank cards, for infinite stakes, with a Dealer who wonât tell you the rules, and who smiles all the time.
This also comes up near the end of the Armageddon that Almost Was, where Gabriel (or the Metatron in the book) tries to claim that God does not play dice with the Universe/His Loyal Servants. ("Where have you been!?")
And returning to Job (briefly), that was framed as a wager, a bet, between God and Satan.
All over the series you have wagers, chess, games of skill and chance, cards, and gambling as a running motif:
Hell wasnât a major reservoir of evil, any more than Heaven, in Crowleyâs opinion, was a fountain of goodness; they were just sides in the great cosmic chess game. Where you found the real McCoy, the real grace and the real heart-stopping evil, was right inside the human mind.
Crowley reminds us of the Three Card Monte analogy used in S1 when he is drunkenly talking to Jesus. And when he tries to win the Bentley back. The thing to remember about the Three Card Monte is that it's a confidence game at its heart. The dealer will always win in a well-executed game. They don't even have to deal in order to win in the best-laid of plans. And we know that God plays some kind of ineffable card game of her own devising, so why not Three Card Monte? "Nobody ever finds the lady unless she wants them to." Does God play sleight of hand tricks with the Universe as well?
The other thing that the Three Card Monte usually employs is a shill to sell the validity of the game. We'll come back to that idea.
Crowley's early triumphant run at blackjack, followed by the inability to "find the lady" is put there specifically to put us in mind of unfairness, stacked decks, and playing in a rigged game. Just as BC's high-pressure ambush on Crowley when he lost the Bentley is.
Crowley even says it, out loud when he and Aziraphale are in the Bentley looking for Jesus:
"It's all rigged! The entire universe! [...] But you're not [the boss] and you never will be! There's always someone above you stacking the deck."
Aziraphale also mentions that the Metatron is missing during this exchange, but of course we can infer that Crowley really means God here when talking about who the real Boss is.
And if we understand God to be omnipotent, omnipresent but also playing Her own personal game with the Universe⌠where does Free Will factor in?
Free Will in Good Omens is a bit of a sticky wicket. It is said that angels and demons do not have Free Will, but that humans do, that they get to choose, but... do they?
I am not remotely qualified to talk about the myriad of ways people try to reconcile this question (or don't, looking at you, Calvanists), but Good Omens as a whole seems to be mostly operating on a binary of an either/or. Maybe you can make an argument that God lets humans choose the little things or, conversely, maybe she lets us choose the big things, but I don't know that it is fully settled that Free Will is as real as we think it is.
Throughout the show and the novel, at critical junctures Aziraphale and Crowley turn to each other and ask: "Did the Almighty Plan it this way all along?" Now we could make the argument that as beings without Free Will, this may just be their default position. After all, they are much closer to Her than we are, even if humans are made in Godâs own image.
But it happens multiple times in the book at the show, and most of these exchanges are nearly identical to the book.
Their meeting in Eden starts with them contemplating Godâs plans. Practically page 1 of the book!!
âYouâve got to admit itâs a bit of a pantomime, though,â said Crawly. âI mean, pointing out the Tree and saying âDonât Touchâ in big letters. Not very subtle, is it? I mean, why not put it on top of a high mountain or a long way off? Makes you wonder what Heâs really planning.â âBest not to speculate, really,â said Aziraphale.
Or again, later, 11 years before Armageddon:
âI canât interfere with divine plans,â he croaked. Crowley looked speculatively into his glass, and then filled it again. âWhat about diabolical ones?â he said.
âPardon?â
âWell, itâs got to be a diabolical plan, hasnât it? Weâre doing it. My side.â
âAh, but itâs all part of the overall divine plan,â said Aziraphale. âYour side canât do anything without it being part of the ineffable divine plan,â he added, with a trace of smugness.
The biggest difference in the book when deciding to become Godfathers, is that Aziraphale throws in a dig that everything that Hell does is part of the overall Ineffable Divine Plan. A sort of smug âneener-neenerâ that always lets him have the upper hand.
But it cuts both ways, doesnât it? We see Aziraphale struggle in the book and the show with the idea of ineffability and trying to intuit what God actually wants (see The Flood and Job) and reconcile those wants that with his morals.
And as Aziraphale contemplates in the book: Sometimes you really had to hope that the ineffable plan had been properly thought out.
And then of course, after Adam et al avert the Apocalypse, in the book as in the show, Aziraphale and Crowley ask themselvesâagainâif God had really planned everything out this way (on the page and onscreen).
The last time they really talk about Godâs plans in the book was left out of season 1, but transplanted into season 3. It is adapted, of course, for the screen and to account for different characters being present, but just about everything said on screen for much of that scene is directly from the book:
With the understanding that we canât really fathom the Ineffableâis God playing Solitaire or Three Card Monte?
Indeed, Crowley asks a fantastic question in his little tirade. Why would God let the rebellion and good and evil happen? What if Satanâs role in the cosmic game is to act as a shill? Whether Satan knows it or not*, he and Hell are there to sell humans on the idea that we have Free Will.
*(Iâm not sure he does, but Crowley implies that he might be in on the grift with his assertion âYou knew we couldnât win!â)
Because thatâs the problem, with having an all-knowing, all-seeing, all-present deity that is playing some kind of cosmic game with the Universe. Itâs that, fundamentally, They could be manipulating everything. They do have the power to exert control or lay out plans within plans. Itâs nearly a paradox, isnât it? If God knows all, and sees all, and has all power, do our choices even matter if we do have Free Will? If God can anticipate our every choice and action and build a game around it, is that still Free Will? Or is that stacking the deck? If we have the Free Will to exert our own choices and thwart Her plans, then wouldnât that make us more powerful than the all-powerful God? Doesnât She always have the upper hand on us?
With Satan and the illusion of Free Will the Universe becomes a blind test (it could never be double-blind, with one party all-seeing). With Heaven and Hell being the same sides of one coin (or two floors in the same building) that gives humans an illusion of choice in where we are going, when it is all the same destination. Maybe we all get shuffled back into the deck after everything is said and done.
As I have said, this is a question that has bedeviled humanity for thousands of years. I donât have the answer, but I feel like the text really encourages us to think about the ultimate authority and power of God, and the structure of the Universe according to Their ineffable whims.
So, at last, we come to the final sequence. In the show Aziraphale and Crowley are alone with Satan and God, and almost the whole of Creation destroyed.
I will risk a bit of speculation in this part, on how the sequel-that-never-was or what-a-six-season-arc would have looked like, but I will try to minimize this, but I feel like that is equally important to explaining why this worked so well for me, because I feel like you can see the shape of greater things in what we got.
I think, if you take the ideas from the book that did not make it into season 1, and the ideas that were seeded in season 2, you could absolutely find your way to a sequel that asks the question: Is it right or just or fair for humans to live under the yoke of beings so much more powerful than us? For them to use us so cheaply like cards in a deck? And the answer is, of course: no.
And I do believe it when the team says that this was the intended ending all these years, so I do think itâs right and natural that A&C would get elevated roles in a sequel anyways, given that theyâd probably be the most major (if not only) repeat characters in the sequel that never was. The Pratchett estate could have let this go. They fought tooth and nail to claw this out of cancellation. Rob is an executive producer on the project. He and Terryâs daughter (and, yes, even certain disgraced other parties) have all insisted that this is where we were going to end up. The ending was the thing that everyone involved in was the most protective of.
But we got an imperfect ending. It would have been nice, and an obvious bookend, for example, to get Jesus facing down his Mother as we got Adam facing down Satan. I think we definitely would have gotten something more there in a full season. But the writing is already so tight, there wasnât enough time to fully develop both story lines in full, and they absolutely focused on the themes Iâve already talked about up to this point. And because Aziraphale and Crowley are our protagonists now, from Season 2 on, they are the ones to make this choice in the end. And I think that is right and proper in this instance. Because they are ultimately deciding what happens to the supernatural world.
Aziraphale and Crowley get some time to themselves in a garden, and Aziraphale asks Crowley what he wants. (Because he knows he is too selfish in this moment, he just wants Crowley). And Crowleyâthe demon who thought this whole time (and yet also doubted) that he gave humanity Free Will, wants to do it all over again. Only this time, he wants to do it right. He wants it to be real.
And he and Aziraphale do it. For us.
Because they know, even if they banished the rest of Heaven and Hell, they themselves would always be prone to influence the world around them with their powers. Once you start messing around, you canât really stop. Even if God put the Universe back how it was, you could never get away from that kind of interference. Itâs embedded in the very bones.
Now was this a test from God just to see what they choose? Or does She actually cede control for a change? Or is it another one of Her Plans?
Let us ask ourselves, why is Satan really here? Is Satan there to sell the image of Free Will to Aziraphale and Crowley as he was to humans? His place in the ending seemed strange to me until I thought of his role as the shill in Three Card Monte. (And how quick he is to tell us that The Satan was just a role, a job title!)
Because if Satan is in on the grift, not just an unwitting tool, he seems genuinely shocked by Her acquiescence. He didnât think theyâd get their way, that She would enact whatever Her real plans were.
And I think they did it. I think Aziraphale and Crowley, impossibly, Found the Lady with the decision they made. (Whether or not God wanted them to). They did the impossible and asked for the impossible in return.
It is a difficult ending open to a MULTITUDE of interpretations, but I think they were also able to vouchsafe the universe from any undue interference from Her in that moment.
They asked for a Godless universe. They birthed a Universe with their love (didnât we see how powerful they are when they work miracles together!?). They asked for our choices to matter. Wouldnât their choiceâhaving a true, real decisionâmake them more powerful than God in that moment!?
And if we make choices in this Universe for good or evil, at least it will be us making them. If the Universe is unfair, then it is unfair to everyone in the same way. There is no favoritism or predetermined fate. No special providence in the fall of a sparrow.
This is a bit more of my own interpretation (or at least one of them, I hold multiple readings of the ending at the moment, and I'm still developing some of these ideas), but I think the similarities we see in our history are implied to be the echoes of what happened. The echoes of Aziraphale and Crowleyâs memories ripple through our Universe and our Earth.
As Adam says in the book:
Spirited Away has a lovely companion to this idea: Nothing that happens is ever forgotten, even if you can't remember it. || Once you've met someone you never really forget them. It just takes a while for your memories to return.
I like to think that Aziraphale and Crowley quantum entangled themselves in that moment. That they know, underneath, in their souls who they are and everything that happened, even if they don't always remember. But now they get to be just like us, through a multitude of lifetimes, finding each other over and over. Soulmates by choice.
Reblogging this because it does an incredible job of bringing together all of the threads that I also saw as the framework of what the finale was supposed to be. Unfortunately, there just wasnât enough time to make it a tapestry, and so all of this amounted to pretty much nothing except a tragedy. Itâs why Iâve been saying it was still a good ending, just not the best one. Especially the very end, where the version that we get is Aziraphale and Crowley dying for the sake of a world without supernatural meddling, except the God we met is not a god weâve been shown to be trustworthy. Then theyâre replaced by two different beings with their faces, who Iâm more inclined to believe are evidence of God meddling again by reusing their corporations than any sort of soulmate destiny. I donât think that was the intention of those who created it, because those people were not cruel, but itâs what we were shown nonetheless.
So these are text posts that I made and posted previously with stills from the S3 finale before we had any context for them. They hurt more nowđŤ Iâm still grieving over here đđ¤ŹđŤđđ
You can find all my previous text posts (including these) here. Most of them are not as sadâŚ
"for my money, the really big one will be all of Us against all of Them."
SO SPITTING MAD ABOUT THIS i had to edit and repost from x/bsky
am i the only one who remembers this good omens sequel idea that was laid so beautifully at our feet in the year of our lord 1990? that was important enough to be quoted near verbatim in S1? the one where mortals of the world unite cuz we have nothing to lose but our chains??
"ohhh you're upset about the finale because you only care about aziracrow you don't care about the bigger picture" nah man don't pin that on me. i am 40 or 50 years old and i do not need this. you can't gaslight me into forgetting that one of the fundamental charms of GO is that aziraphale & crowley are actually very bad at saving the world, they cock up pretty much everything they try to do and it's only through serendipity (or implied providence??) that their actions end up facilitating HUMANS' efforts to save ourselves. you can't gaslight me into thinking that the universe getting destroyed & recreated on a whim with absolutely zero HUMAN input or agency is a happy ending, or that it's at all in keeping with the spirit of the original story.
the concept of the multiverse got traction in genre fiction via comics where it was introduced as a PLOT DEVICE to reconcile timeline inconsistencies (and an unnecessary one at that; the way to deal with "timeline inconsistencies" in long form serial fantasy is to IGNORE THEM). writers should have never started relying on the multiverse so heavily as a storyline foundation (MCU i am looking at YOU) because the logical end result is to make stories MEANINGLESS! what's the point of fighting for anything if you can just escape to another universe where things turn out better?! "we found each other in every universe" bitch i care about THIS ONE! how does that treacly platitude teach ANYONE anything meaningful or relatable or transferable about real life?!
stand UP! i want the good omens sequel where HUMANITY rises up against this bullshit system and A&C are there to cheer us on. and if you think "oh there's no way A&C could ever have been happy in this universe, this was the only solution" get out of my way cuz if that's the limp attitude you bring when it's a WORLD OF FANTASY FICTION WHERE LITERALLY ANYTHING CAN HAPPEN i do NOT need you around me in this world.
No wonder nobody could find you. This is where you were keeping all your memories. All your... you.
It's This. Beelzebub isn't even looking at the man next to her. That's not the person who is their hell and happiness. He's not in there. He's where his memories are -- in the fly.
In the finale ending we were given, I can see the power of Crowley's Choice, the incredible love for humanity in their sacrifice, and the beauty of Aziraphale's willingness to disappear into Nothingness with the one Being that makes him feel complete. And my little ace/grey heart is satified without a big show of physical affection, so I'm not sulking over the absence of a Kiss.
But this world, this story, told us that memories are what makes you You. That shiney new children can't just replace the children you already love. That other couples lives might mirror your story, but aren't actually You. That we build off of what is broken, and work to fix it as best we can. That brokenness is still lovable, deserves love and can find love.
Crowley told us the rules of the Book of Life, that what gets erased will have never existed. God contributed another worldbuilding rule, a coldly finite and absolute statement, in Her response to Crowley and Aziraphale's decision -- a Hobson's Choice, btw.
Eventually there'll be humans and life, in all of its mundane glory. Something that both of you will neither know or experience, though.
This is what many of us are struggling with. As much as we love this show and respect Sir Terry, this finale only gives Our Ineffables a happy human ending if the show unravels nearly every rule they ever told us -- including the last words God spoke moments before Asa and Anthony meet.
According to everything we were told, Aziraphale and Crowley are gone. It's a beautiful love story echoing throughout time and space, but it's not theirs anymore. What made them.. Them... is gone.
It's okay if you see it differently.
But many of us are stuck here, trapped in a limbo where our minds and hearts are faced with our own Hobson's Choice. Unexpected. Impossible. Heartbreaking.
Iâm sleepy and thinking too hard. Here is a clumsy thought
I thinkâŚ.I just think, um, that throughout the series, Crowley emphasized that humans were going to do bad things (or good things) regardless of demonic or angelic intervention.
âThe humans just thought it up themselves! Nothing to do with me!
Humans have actual free will. Demons and angels did too, otherwise there would be no conflict of substance in the story.
And um, so⌠after our boyâs decision at the end, God lets the big bang happen and humans exist in billions of years anyway through natural evolution, as we understand it.
Crowley asked God âwhy did you make them that way?ââŚ.butâŚ.BUTâŚ.
The new humans create in exactly the same way, as we see in the books and buildings and the language they speak. They even make graffiti and STILL have concepts of angels and demons, as we see in the artwork.
They love the same and have the same marriage rituals, as we see with Asa and Anthonyâs rings.
Theyâre the exact same type of creature as the original humans, which tells me goodness and evil still exist in the same capacity in the new world, regardless of a lack of a Goddess or Her angels and demons.
SoâŚ.so maybeâŚmaybe the ending doesnât make sense and they should have just asked God to completely remove herself from the picture and leave them all alone.
So humans could human, without worrying about what happens after death. And so angel and demon could just be words that Aziraphale and Crowley could ignoreâŚ.
All this to say, the ending was cruel and unnecessary on purpose. The message wasnât original and didnât follow the build up weâd been given for two seasons.
If it really was the ending Pratchett wanted (which I have not seen proof of) then the writer is a bad storyteller, considering how he chose to lead up to it.
