Martha Mansfield photographed by Alfred Cheney Johnston for Vogue, 1922.
taylor price

Discoholic 🪩
Xuebing Du
Cosimo Galluzzi
★
almost home
art blog(derogatory)
Cosmic Funnies
No title available

oozey mess
Misplaced Lens Cap
🩵 avery cochrane 🩵
No title available

No title available
h
Doug Jones
The Bowery Presents
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
Noah Kahan

titsay

seen from Malaysia

seen from Canada
seen from Switzerland
seen from Germany
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Türkiye

seen from South Korea

seen from Bulgaria

seen from Canada

seen from Colombia

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from Germany
seen from United States

seen from Belgium

seen from Bulgaria

seen from South Korea
seen from Singapore
seen from Bangladesh
seen from Türkiye
@theskythatwelookupon
Martha Mansfield photographed by Alfred Cheney Johnston for Vogue, 1922.
IYKYK
To give some perspective: Chariots were invented circa 2000 BC and were the fastest form of transportation known to man for around 3800 years until trains in the 1800′s. Then 100 years later we were flying, and 66 years after that we were on the Moon.
Laura Ingalls Wilder lived to 90. The first time she crossed the prarie, she walked. The last time she crossed the prarie, she flew in a jet.
Bill Pullman as Andy Safian in Malice (1993)
the duality of (cat) man
I painted some of my favorite Unus Annus moments! I've tried posting on twitter, instagram, reddit, this is my last chance... Lol Amy PLZ 🙏🙏
why is he like this
folks on twitter have already pointed out that Cruella is perhaps the worst possible choice for a protagonist seeing as how her entire motivation is ‘wants to murder puppies for money’ and there’s just. no way to spin that.
Maleficent worked, okay, she worked because she was a pretty mysterious character to begin with; her goals and motivations in Sleeping Beauty were vague enough that there was room for character exploration. but Cruella?
the reason Cruella was such a fantastic and fantastically funny villain was just how BASIC she was.
here’s Cruella: she designs clothes, she thinks a puppy-skin coat would look cool, she kidnaps a bunch of puppies because she’s rich and spoiled and used to getting her way. that’s it. that’s all there is to her. that’s all there needed to be, because a. her voice actress was god-tier b. her design and animation was flawless c. the story was pretty simple and didn’t need a villain with complex motivations and d. she shared the villainous spotlight with Jasper and Horace (who i might actually be interested in seeing a movie about tbh, just because ‘a weird old rich lady hired us to steal dogs from another rich lady and her husband and now the dogs are fighting back why is this happening where did my life go wrong’ is a fucking hilarious premise)
my point is WHY NOT URSULA
SERIOUSLY. URSULA.
there’s SO MUCH you could do with Ursula. not only does she have all the charisma and visual flare that Cruella does, her motivations, like Maleficent’s, were always a touch unclear.
she fucking hates the king of the sea and it’s never really explained why. she fucks around with two monarchies seemingly for the lols. she can do magic but she lives alone in a cave with only her prisoners and her two eels for company AND she actually loves her eels and is legit sad when they die. she’s weird and mysterious and sneaky and badass and there’s just. so many cool paces you could go with her! does she have a reason to hate the king? why is she the only octopus person we see? why do people still make deals with her given that she’s made a horrifying living garden out of those who couldn’t pay up? she turned herself into a human so she’s a shapeshifter, holy fuck, is that something she’s done before?
ursula movie pls (but like. someone other than disney make it)