sorry I see every popular blonde mean girl as a comphet lesbian. like it's not my problem that I don't see them being attracted to men like you do
I won’t be elaborating.
Sade Olutola

No title available
Three Goblin Art
ojovivo
KIROKAZE
Sweet Seals For You, Always
Stranger Things

Discoholic 🪩

Andulka
art blog(derogatory)
Cosimo Galluzzi
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
todays bird
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"

PR's Tumblrdome
sheepfilms
dirt enthusiast

Kiana Khansmith
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
Alisa U Zemlji Chuda
seen from United States

seen from Ukraine

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from TĂĽrkiye

seen from Canada
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from T1
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Argentina
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
@thisbarbieisalesbian
sorry I see every popular blonde mean girl as a comphet lesbian. like it's not my problem that I don't see them being attracted to men like you do
I won’t be elaborating.
"This story is a tragedy because it didn't have to end this way."
vs
"This story is a tragedy because it was always going to end this way."
I don't I'll ever get over the fact that we now have a solo version of exile
Sorry Maroon took so long I have been up for almost 24 hours and getting it to sound alright was a struggle
incapable of being normal about this
The crowd lost their shit over this one, as they should (also don't worry, she messed up)
True crime podcast but you realize as you're listening that the host is just describing episodes of Scooby-Doo
you wanna kill me? what like sexually?
The Potrait of Lady on Fire, is by far one of the most beautiful portrayal of lesbian homoeroticism. Two women, one painter, one noble woman enunciating love in its finest through the myth of Eurydice leaves us moving by its exquisite artistry. But what to me, this movie brings forth is the love one decides to keep within, ever immortal even though it has not found the understood normative notion of fulfillment in love. But does Love mean 'till death companionship' always? Can't Love not go beyond this? Beyond following normative of sealed eternity? Togetherness may, in future profane one's love.(I speak in probable terms)But the love we feel in all its tremors and pleasures, treasured in deep vaults of our hearts and minds, may be the most beautiful. So, when we part in all physicality what remains is the love we shared under the trees, near the ocean, below the sky is all we have, is all we need and all we can give with its fevered passions clinging to us all eternity. Perhaps, love in itself will teach us the intensity of love and that when one love parts we are not lost, we will know to seek it in someone we uphold the most because sometimes-
"We love with a love that was more than love-----that which reincarnates and reproduces for the next"
"The Portrait of Lady Fire"(2019)
ugh okay i rewatched portrait of a lady on fire last night and just. feeling INSANE about the three “endings” and what they show us. Ending #1 is what you’d expect, a fraught goodbye as two hearts break in front of each other. emotionally destroyed me <3
BUT THEN we get ending #2. Marianne is caught off guard when she sees a portrait of Héloïse in the academy of art. It’s heartbreak all over again when she spots that she has her book open on page 28. She’s sending a message to Marianne that it’s always going to be her. The unfairness of it all seeps back in.
AND THEN THE FINALE, ending #3. When Marianne spots Héloïse at the concert hall she gets to watch her experience orchestral music (possibly for the first time) like they’d discussed. The camera holds a close shot of Héloïse, overwhelmed and crying, but laughing and free. We the audience, are Marianne, watching the woman we love be out of reach. We are watching her experience joy, regret and grief, and saying goodbye. It’s a strange kind of closure.
what if we seriously altered each other’s lives forever because we were the right people at the wrong time (era, situation, period in our lives, etc) and also we tried to capture each other’s likeness as a way to hold onto a love that never felt like ours and to have proof of what The Lover looks like to us because everyone else in our world tells us The Lover is not The Right Lover but they havent seen her through My eyes and also and most importantly we were both girls
julienrbaker: real 1s kno
And also the way Barbie and Ken are role playing heterosexuality without any inherent sexuality of their own, without any understanding of what it means, or even any genitals at all! Just pretty-girl + handsome-guy = obviously a couple. And the way it fucks them both up! Because they’re both stereotypes, neither of them is a specialist version, no brain surgery or pilots license or Nobel prize for either of them. They’re just assigned the roles of Every Man and Every Woman. And Ken ends up doing Way Too Much because he’s hanging his entire self-worth on being important to Barbie. And Barbie just isn’t interested in him, she was assigned a boyfriend she didn’t ask for and doesn’t want and doesn’t know what to do with, just because that’s what society expects of men and women, that they will necessarily couple up and fall in love because… that’s what they do. Regardless of any personal quality of either party.
It’s about heteronormativity and amatonormativity and the unrealistic expectations society sets boys and girls up for from infancy. Barbie and Ken are every pair of toddlers sharing a sandbox while the adults around them call them each other’s little “boyfriend” or “girlfriend” even though neither party understands or is capable of understanding the implied meaning of that. Or wants to.
It’s a literal funhouse mirror of that weird pressure put on kids to perform heterosexuality from an early age. It examines how that leaves us unprepared for the complicated reality of actual relationships even if it turns out that you are heterosexual and do want sex and romance. Boys and girls aren’t really allowed to be just kids on the same team, so they grow up into men and women who generally want very different things from each other and are trained to look for it in everybody because anybody is better than nobody, and try to force it to work.
Barbie and Ken letting each other go in the end was perfect. Barbie the Every Woman realizing that she doesn’t have to be special, she just has to be, and Ken the Every Man realizing he has to seek validation elsewhere and lean on his fellow Kens for emotional support, WHICH THEY GIVE.
Truly a movie of all time.
Julien + laughter
when julien baker said “and I’d never do it but it’s not a joke/ I can’t tell the difference when I’m all alone” and “what right had you/ not to let me die?/ but did I even know what I was asking for?” and “why did you let them leave and then make me stay?” I felt seen
Anyway Barbie sitting on a bench, just having cried for the first time and looking over at an old woman and very genuinely complimenting her beauty was such a lovely moment. Because not long before, Barbie was freaking out about cellulite. But here in the Real World, where everything is so much more complicated than she could have imagined, so much more painful, she looks over and sees a woman who has actually lived. Aging is a privilege not afforded to everybody, and this little old woman, with all these years and experiences inside her, quite happy and at peace and secure with herself (she knows she’s beautiful), represents what Barbie is only starting to understand, that real death is staying the same forever.
That’s why it’s so important that The Ghost Of Ruth Handler, a little old lady herself, is the one who guides her into real life. She warns Barbie that by choosing to live, she must by necessity die. But in keeping with the themes of growing up, of adulthood, of womanhood, Barbie now knows that you can’t ever really return to the version of yourself that didn’t know something. Children, most children anyway, don’t really understand death. Part of the emotional struggle of adolescence and young adulthood is having to come to grips with the inevitable fact that your parents will die someday, as will everyone you love, and you yourself. If you’re lucky, not for many years. But it will happen.
And I think that’s why the turning point is “do you guys ever think about dying?” That’s why it matters that the girl playing with Barbie and changing her is a middle-aged woman. Gloria is grappling with her own morality and stifled creativity and feeling her daughter slip away from her and looking back on those days of innocent joyful play and the thing is that it’s all so sweetly painfully joyously human that it changes Barbie.
There’s a maiden(s), mother(s), and crone(s) aspect at play, and Barbie is all three and none at all. She is Ruth’s daughter and she is at once old (64 this year) and young (a toy for children, sexless and innocent and optimistic). Sasha is her past and Gloria is her present and the old woman on the park bench, filled up with years and life and peace and joy, is her future.
Barbie chose to become human, but it was also never really a choice. You can’t un-know something, you can’t ever go backward, you can only go forward. Humans only have one ending. The only alternative to growing is dying. And death may be inevitable, but better later than sooner. The child must become the adult. The adult must become the elder. The elder must eventually die. And living all those years is a gift even when it’s painful and Barbie embraces it.