I saw this meme and I immediately thought of them
Stranger Things
TVSTRANGERTHINGS

if i look back, i am lost
No title available
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open

Product Placement

Janaina Medeiros
Misplaced Lens Cap
cherry valley forever
styofa doing anything

⁂
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
hello vonnie
dirt enthusiast
h
NASA
trying on a metaphor
Jules of Nature

Kaledo Art
will byers stan first human second

seen from United States

seen from Singapore
seen from Türkiye

seen from Italy

seen from Poland
seen from Russia
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Türkiye

seen from Malaysia

seen from Singapore

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Chile

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Singapore
@thisworldisagame
I saw this meme and I immediately thought of them
it did psychic damage to me the first time i ever played through rdr2 because i got to the epilogue and was happily playing and yeah i might have been a little bit like 'okay i understand abigail is upset with john and killing that boss at hanging dog ranch was something he shouldn't have done but what else was he supposed to do when the geddes' ranch was being raided?' and then when i got to the mission where she leaves john my mom came in out of nowhere like "so she left? good cause i think john could do better than her"
i went "...whaaat do you mean?" so then my mom explained "i just think she's really annoying and bitchy and naggy. i remember feeling that way when you played the first game too" and i was like. stunned?? i made sure not to do the marriage proposal mission while my mom was in the room but instead my younger sister was with me roasting the photographer's booth and pointing out how forced and uncomfortable john and abigail looked in all the poses
Something that rips me apart while being in camp is seeing Abigail and how little she interacts with the others. Most of the characters have interactions or encounters with other characters where they tell their story, fool around or just socialize. It is every day chit chatter, but not Abigail. Abigail's few only encounters are shouting at the campfire that being a mother sucks, talking to John about their child, Susan telling her to take up sex work or Micah trynna hit on her.
She has events, but none of them are as light hearted as Mary-Beth and Karen discussing a romantic curse, Bill praising Javier to the heavens to Sean because of a Job, a bigger group singing songs or Hosea giving advice.
Even in the two events she has with other girls that are nice, she is being a provider, she is being a mother, not to Jack but to the girls as she comforts them.
A lot of the times she will also sit on her own by the tent next to Jack, whereas a lot of the others will be sitting by the fireplace, even if they aren't talking, they are socializing.
She is similar to the gang, yet so different because she is a mother. Yes she is a theif like Mary-Beth, but she is also a mom. Yes, she is an attractive catch like Karen, but she is also a mom. There is a rift there that none of the other characters can relate to and because of that she gets isolated even if it isn't intentionally.
It really breaks my heart to see, often times she also sounds so damn tired when you speak to her or when you hear her muttering "what would I do without you?" to Jack.
Another thing that makes it worse is the fact she has zero support, there is no one there for her. There is a chance of her coming up to ask Arthur for five dollars because she needs to clothe her child yet John won't help. She carries a completely different burden and worry from the others, that they would not relate to. The only one who can is Arthur, because he too has had a child.
Arthur does help whereever he can, taking the role of John the best he can because he is a provider, but it is still quite clear there is a line that the two of them don't cross. Both of them know that John is meant to care for Abigail because he got her pregnant and it is his responsibility, and especially in this time period there really is this idea of "he is meant to help, so he will," the problem is though that John doesn't help, so Abigail is left on her own. Arthur only steps in in the worst times when she truely is at rock bottom.
See I think that's the problem I have with that "the gang is just a big family!!!" interpretation. They live together but very few of them actually receive meaningful support from the others. I will say, her interactions with Hosea are the only ones in which someone is looking out for HER. He's the only one who participates with Jack, who is trying to relieve some of her burden in life and comforts her when she expresses that she's afraid and uncertain.
She's a lot more relaxed and lighthearted in the epilogue because it's the first time John has proven that he really, genuinely cares for her. Her home is the one thing she has that is hers, that is hers because someone loved her enough to make it happen. (And then her home is invaded (twice) and her husband is shot like a dog in front of the barn he built with his own two hands for her and—)
i'd also like to add, because it's easy to forget, she's literally only 22 when we meet her. and has been a mother for 4 years by this point. she's practically a kid herself.
i honestly think people would like mary more if they just, for a second, thought about the reason behind her actions and not take their actions at face value and immediately assume the worst
because of course, mary would go to arthur for help, her younger brother is with a dangerous cult who plan to kill themselves "for chelonia" and arthur is the most capable man she knows to be able to save jamie from such a horrible fate, i mean, her dads an abusive alcoholic, her husbands dead and her mothers dead too, it's clear (to me) that she lives a very isolated life, likely due to her father, so she goes to the man she knows can save her younger brother.
because of course, she gets upset when you reject her, as that means that jamie would die and she'd not only lose her younger brother but likely the only person who loves (and she loves back) unconditionally.
she isn't being "manipulative" she's fucking scared! and angry! and she has every right to be.
because of course, she doesn't want to join arthurs gang, a gang where she would absolutely be mistreated by the members in the gang, by dutch, who would see her as a threat to arthurs loyalty, by susan, who thinks that mary acts above her station, by john, who would likely hold a grudge against mary from remembering how arthur was when she broke their engagement, by micah, who is so vile n misogynistic to all the women in the gang.
because of course she wouldn't want to be in a gang where her life is in danger constantly, hers moreso seeing as annabelle died by colm's hand, a rival gang, bessie died through sickness, eliza died from a burglary, all three of the old guards have lost a partner.
because of course, she wants arthur to run away with her, to a life of safety and love, so arthur could live without the threat of death, whether by shootouts, ransoms, or hangings, without the need to ruin the lives of other people so that the van der linde gang could survive.
because of course, she tells arthur that "he'll never change" because he doesn't. he starts the game being in the van der linde gang, and he ends the game dying in the van der linde gang, he is and was always loyal to the van der linde gang and repeatedly made the conscious decision to choose the van der linde gang over her every single time. she shouldn't have to waste her life waiting on a man who will never choose her, will never be as loyal to her.
and sure, to us, we have watched him change over the course of the game, but mary hasn't. mary wasn't there to watch him change, and considering the fact that she has known her longer than us, i'll believe her when she says he hasn't changed.
mary isn't evil, she isn't manipulative, she isn't a bitch, she's in love with a man who constantly chooses a life where he is under constant risk of death, over her and a life that allows arthur to be the good man she wholeheartedly believes he is.
i'm not telling you to like her, you don't have to, but I'm telling you to not assume the worst of her and criticise her for simply being flawed.
What do you think about Sadie’s writing? I love her but it’s strange to have the whole “revenge is a fools game” theme while also having a character whose search for revenge is framed as righteous and who faces no consequences for doing so
I think people mischaracterize the way Sadie's revenge is framed. It's not framed as righteous. It's framed as sympathetic. The game never says "Sadie's right" but it does say "Sadie has reasons that make this FEEL justified". Part of the reason we think she faces no consequences is because we do not know where her story ended and we are not fully able to contextualize her mindset as she's not the protagonist.
However, we know she is intentionally isolating herself to prevent herself from feeling the kind of loss she felt with Jake. She doesn't seem to have anywhere she calls home, she simply roams and bounty hunts. She sees herself as a monster. She does not recognize the person she's become by the end of Arthur's arc and she's trying to rationalize the way she makes money by the end of rdr2's epilogue.
She may not be dead or taken up by the law the way John or Arthur are, but she also wasn't an Outlaw her entire life and didn't annihilate scores of innocents for half her life either. She joins the gang as she has no other choice after O'Driscoll's kill her spouse and the VDL gang burns down her home.
So does she face consequences? Not in the same way our protagonists or the likes of Dutch and so on do, and I think a big reason for that is her misdeeds are clearly very different from those of Arthur or John, etc. But that doesn't mean she doesn't pay for her choices and won't continue to as she continues to live the way she does.
you're in his DMs, I'm yelling "You have committed crimes against Skyrim and her people. What say you in your defense?" at him
we are not the same
it’s kind of crazy that both fallout new Vegas and fallout 4 have the same driving force for the first half of the narrative (find the guy who wronged you and make him pay) but Benny is so much more memorable and narratively interesting than Kellogg.
It’s a matter of a strong character foil versus a weak one, in my opinion.
Benny and the courier are very much alike. They are both ambitious people who are willing to do anything possible to stack the odds in their favour. Honestly, Benny and the courier are the same card, reversed.
The Sole Survivor and Kellogg are also intended to be character foils. The game tries to convince us of this with the scenes in Kellogg’s mind, where we see that he ‘isn’t so different’ from our protagonist after all. But we don’t know anything about Kellogg other than his backstory. How can he parallel the protagonist if we don’t know which traits he has? Which traits the two of them share?
(As a side note, I wish Fallout 4 had touched way more on the ‘Man/Woman Out of Time’ thing. The protagonist being frozen in the past + Kellogg being functionally immortal would’ve been really cool to explore! Especially in the context of grief!)
In the end, I think the reason Benny is a more powerful character foil is that he doesn’t disappear from the world when you kill him. The chairmen can mourn him, House will comment on it, and even NPCs across the Mojave will talk about Benny’s death!
In Kellogg’s case, the protagonist is basically the only person who knows he even existed! Once he’s dead HE’s DEAD! He disappears completely from the narrative! As soon as you leave fort Hagen, the game doesn’t bother looking back.
that’s why Benny is a more haunting force for new Vegas; particularly an independent courier. You are Benny’s legacy because you are what he leaves behind whether he likes it or not. People remember him as the couriers victim. Meanwhile, nobody remembers Kellogg at all. The memory of who Kellogg was dies with you, and you can choose to forget him.
this was more so an excuse to talk about queer identity and masculinity tbh.
Just thought I’d point since you seem interested, but Bill’s reason for joining the military isn’t stated but can be inferred by the context of his dad’s illness. For his dad to have died at the point of losing his sensation of right and left he would’ve lived long past the point of being able to care for himself. That care would cost money that needed to come from somewhere, and Bill has shown he can’t even hunt. (One of the only members that never mentions both parents so he may not even of had a mom to help)
Also there’s no way of knowing what ‘attempted murder’ was for, but ‘deviancy’ is what they put for discharging men that were found to be gay, and Bill was weird about that prostitute that robbed him “being a woman” is because he was about to say something else lol. He’d rather everyone think he got robbed by a woman than think he’s gay
This has been sitting in my inbox for a while and I'm sorry about the long wait! I wanted to take my time with it as I'm not sure if I am reading the intention behind it right or not. When I read it shortly after receiving it my reaction was pretty combative and I obviously do not want to project feelings that aren't there onto someone I do not know.
I did not know that about his father! I had never really run into any evidence in-game of Bill talking about his parents, it's interesting to know that there's still plenty of secrets I haven't run into yet.
As for the topic of charges, deviancy indeed belonged to an article known as Section 8 and mainly referred to soldiers who were determined to be mentally unsound for military service. For the most part, mental illnesses were "treated" through the use of prescribed drugs such as opioids when possible, but not always and there were some things the army deemed impossible to cure. As such, being gay was historically viewed as a mental illness in western society and it was most certainly included in those charges.
I think I know what you meant about the attempted murder charge in that we don't know the circumstances surrounding who Bill tried to kill or why, but I'll admit that the part of me that indulges in pedantic phrasing had a chuckle at the thought of "Well, attempted murder sounds pretty self-explanatory to me." But again, I think what you meant was we don't know what happened.
On preferring everyone in the gang thinking he was robbed by a woman instead of a man— Yes, that was part of the point I was making. Despite the fact that Bill believes women are inferior to men, he believes that telling the gang he was robbed by a woman is preferable to admitting that a man got him in a vulnerable enough position to rob him. (Despite the fact that OTHER characters in the gang have stories about getting robbed by men and do not feel threatened by the idea and so it's really not something he needs to prove.)
“If Milton wasn’t lying and Micah only started working with the Pinkertons after the bank robbery, then who ratted them out if not Molly/Abigail??”
Brother. They rode into Saint Denis (the place known for having way too many lawmen) like THIS.
Dressed and loitered about in front of a city bank like THIS.
BLEW UP A BUILDING LIKE THIS!!!
AFTER killing the local crime boss and destroying his house.
There’s even a little bit of dialogue where John says there’s a lot of law there BEFORE the bomb goes off and Dutch just tells him to have faith (who’s surprised?)
They did not need Abigail or Molly to rat them out.
Let's not forget THE TROLLEY PURSIUTE just FEW DAYS/WEEKS before with MULTIPLE lawmen seeing Duch...
Sure, let's have faith the Pinkertons and lawmen of Saint Denis didn’t notice or recognize the gang.
THIS!!! And the number of times he was warned about super bounty hunters and pinkertons all over the place as far back as near the start of chapter 3.
The gang survived as long as it did because it had never got as desperate for money as they were then. They say it over and over that running a city bank is a risk they wouldn’t usually take and thats clearly for a reason!!
It was their desperation and their sloppiness and their overconfidence that caused them to fail. Not the mother who relies on a deadbeat that’s JUST starting to turn around, or the heartbroken girl Dutch stole away from her home with pretty words and empty promises.
Absolutely absurd that people give Arthur and John the benefit of the doubt by labeling them complex characters (which they are), but won't extend that grace to INCREDIBLY complex characters like Abigail, Molly, and Mary.
Abigail is strictly a nag, Molly is a rat, and Mary is a selfish woman who used Arthur. Meanwhile, John is seen as a deadbeat who grew from that into a family man. Arthur is a murderer, but he's also kind and generous.
Stop only extending grace to your male favs when the red dead women are just as complex as them.
my strategy when it comes to writing:
research moments as they occur in-game
research on historical facts
additional research
gather the thoughts somewhat
writing
and writing
more and more writing
suddenly decide I don't really wanna write the post anymore
????
okay I'm done
post the thing regardless of how incoherent it might actually be
This post is by NO means an attempt to condone the actions of Bill Williamson, who is a terrible man as anyone in the fandom ought to know, but as I've seen some posts recently about one of his campfire monologues and after seeing about 20 "wait is he saying he got drunk and fucked a sheep??" comments I have decided that it MAY actually be worth looking into what Bill was trying to say. Or what I THINK he was trying to say at any rate. Because No, I don't think he was talking about getting drunk enough that he fucked a sheep in any sort of literal sense.
BILL: You know, when I was in the army, fellas would spend all night talking about what they were gonna do the second they left the army. Oh, all kinds of things, like “Oh I'm gonna go and be a cook, or I'm gonna go out and find me a wife.” Hell, someone's like “I'm gonna go and dance with the finest whore in San Francisco.” You know, some shit like that. You know how fellas is. (Noticing Pearson and John's reactions) Oh. Well, no offense… but you know what every one of them did the second they left the army? Join the goddamn army again! Jesus Christ. I mean, here's a group of fellas that spent every waking minute just dreaming of leaving, and-and then they left, and then they jumped back in again! And you know what, that taught me something. And-and it taught me something I will never forget. And that's that most fellas are sheep... That's right. And…if you can tell the difference between a- tell the difference between a sheep…uh, between a sheep and a man…Well you- that makes you a better man than me, sir. And that's all I'm saying. Mark my words. All of you, Mark my words… Stupid army. Sheep.
Bill starts off with this whole "When I Was In The Army..." cliché speech, during which he puts a lot of emphasis on mocking other soldiers, many of whom wanted to give themselves an idea of something to look forward to for when they were finally allowed to leave.
Notably, if you're a fan of the "Bill is gay" theory, I find it interesting to note that he is disparaging:
Men who want to cook. Cooking is not a gendered subject by any means, but put into THIS context, it's not unreasonable to think that Bill is implying that HE thinks cooking is a more feminine occupation, and he takes issue with men who are not insecure about it the way he is. Also, Pearson, the camp cook, provider of many a stew to keep the gang from starving to death, is literally sitting right there when he says this. There's no way this wasn't a dig at him in some way.
Men who want a wife. This one feels pretty self-explanatory, Your Honor. Could count as a dig at Arthur, I suppose, but I think the main emphasis is on the idea that Bill doesn't get why other men would WANT to marry women.
Men who want to spend their free time and agency enjoying themselves in the company of a woman they are not committed to. This appears to be a dig at John Marston due to his involvement with Abigail? But also if I overthink the line enough, he says "DANCE with the finest whore in San Francisco" which implies he's quoting exactly what a soldier said, and if that soldier didn't say "fuck the finest whore" like anyone else in the army would in a situation like this, then his intention probably was just to dance, to be sensitive, to let himself feel a simple pleasure that most people take for granted. Something that Bill doesn't understand, or sees as "soft," or too feminine to allow himself to indulge in.
Bill takes issue with the fact that after all their talk of leaving and dreaming of doing something else with their lives, every single one of the soldiers he knew immediately rejoined the army. I believe this is meant to showcase his lack of understanding and unempathetic regard for others. Hence, he proceeds to call them sheep. He thinks they rejoined the military because they were stupid, incapable of thinking for themselves. His point is scattered all over the place and he's trying to sound smarter than he actually is.
There were plenty of men who voluntarily joined the army during the Messiah War because it gave them a justification to commit unconscionable acts of genocide against indigenous people. I believe that Bill was one of these people.
There were also many men who ultimately did not have much of a choice in their military service. They may have been destitute and unable to find steady work anywhere else. They may have been manipulated or abused into thinking the military wasn't all that bad and by the time they realized the truth, it would've been too late to change anything. They may have been drafted into the military and lacked the skill they would need to successfully dodge the draft, or been found out as draft dodgers and captured to be forced into service. They may have been the victims of press gangs — which by this point in history were illegal and not spoken about publicly, but definitely still existed in some corners of the world.
Some may have been suicidal but felt their best chance to die would be at someone else's hands in the army. Some may have delusionally believed they were invincible and going to live forever. Any number of reasons someone could have for joining the military, this is why we're meant to criticize the Military Industrial Complex, not soldiers themselves.
Throughout the story of RDR2 we can see what the short and long term effects of war have been on several characters. Captain Monroe is a kind, honorable man who is using his position in the military for good reasons, doing everything in his power to try and help the Wapiti tribe, attempting to reverse the damage the US government has caused them by breaking treaties. Monroe's superior, Colonel Favours is a corrupt aggressor who continually provokes the Wapiti into fighting and starting another war the tribes will be destined to lose. Rains Fall has seen and led his people to endure and survive the rigors of war for many years.
Hamish fought in the Civil War and lost his leg to gangrene after being shot. He doesn't have much else to say about the past, he'd much rather focus on his passion for fishing and hunting. There is a Civil War Clingman somewhere in New Hanover who believes, 30 or so years later, that he is still guarding his post, as though the war never ended for him. The Lemoyne Raiders gang during my playthrough always seems like it skews younger in membership, so it seems to be mostly men who would've been too young to fight during the Civil War or who weren't even born yet during that time. There are a few older NPCs who seem like they were part of the confederate army during the war and clearly, they can't let go of the past either. They still wear old confederate uniforms, they raise their own armed militia, they boast about creating a free state for themselves.
There's a good point brought up by the woman asking for donations to be put toward the veteran's hall being built in Saint Denis. She states that up to 7% of the nation's veterans are without homes and that while the government is eager to turn men into soldiers, they are also quick to abandon those same soldiers after they no longer serve the purpose they were trained for. Arthur can refuse to donate and even exacerbate the woman's distress by antagonizing her with the comment 'A shelter won't do 'em any good if you ask me. What a soldier needs is a target, not a bed.' The woman will respond with 'But the war is over! The war is over...' with a defeated sigh.
Soldiers often struggle, especially if they have no support systems in place to help them, to reintegrate into civilized society after military service. Due to the prevalence of PTSD that develops during or after their enlistment period, issues such as substance abuse including alcoholism and opioid addiction is common as a means of self-medicating, and soldiers often turn to crime as a means of survival. Such appears to be the case with Bill Williamson.
BILL: You mind if I sit? You know, when I first met Dutch, when I first met many of you, I had just left the army…and it wasn't on a case of no dishonorable discharge like I'm sure some of you may have heard around here. But it was by mutual consent on account of our differing opinions, or that's how…that's how the captain put it. Differing opinions. The army? They had their opinions and I had mine. We was equals, but we went our separate ways. Now me…I…I spent a few nights sleeping rough. I admit…I, uh…funny…I…I-I-I…I was robbed. I was robbed by someone that was a…well, you know, well… No, no. It was a woman. I was robbed by a woman! And then I met Dutch. Now, unlike some of you vagrants and vagabonds and orphans and murderers, I've seen what Uncle Sam can do up close. Nothing will make you believe in a man like Dutch more than seeing what power can…what power can do to a captain in the US Army. I mean it…it-it…it corrupts a man. It corrupts a man totally. But I…I believe in Dutch. And I know, Dutch is Dutch. But I believe in him where…where he talks, I walks. And…and that's the way it's gonna be… And it was a woman! I see you chuckling…
Bill did not leave the army willingly, but he does have another campfire story where he tries to claim that he left by mutual consent which we know is not true because we can find his discharge papers that clearly state he was "DISHONORABLY DISCHARGED by reason of DEVIANCY and ATTEMPTED MURDER".
Once again, Bill's point is scattered all over the fucking place in this story. It's almost completely incoherent unless you have the words out in front of you. He starts off thinking he's going to talk about Dutch, then he gets defensive about the reason he left the army, and then he gets defensive about getting robbed as if he has to justify to the gang — most of whom have been robbed by someone at some point in their lives — as if it makes him less of a man and he has to prove himself by making up a story about how unavoidable it was. "It was a woman. I was robbed by a woman!"
At first, this might sound strange. If Bill previously insulted women, why would his campfire story center around being robbed by a woman? Surely he thinks women are inherently too weak and powerless to rob a big tough guy like himself? And here's the thing: he does think that.
But I think he's trying to use this story to do two things. The first is that he's defensive and he's trying to justify why he didn't immediately kill the person who robbed him and the only excuse he can think of for it is "because this was a woman". The second is that he's trying to gain sympathy from the gang by telling them about the evil woman who robbed him and that's why he's so ill-tempered about women. The gang expresses absolutely nothing toward this story. Bill gets upset about people chuckling and laughing at him, but he was the only person he had that reaction when he spoke about it.
Anyway, my final verdict is Bill is gay and heavily insecure in societal expectations as well as his own internalized expectations of what a man is supposed to be and so he falls into an easy trap of believing that men must be masculine and violent and emotionless. That will be all, good night.
''the morning light, when it comes to me, it was there but I could not see''
Arthur’s life was profoundly shaped by his self-hatred, lack of self-worth and disbelief in the existence of kindness in a seemingly dark and cruel world.
I strongly disagree with the statement that Arthur only became a ‘’better’’ man after being diagnosed with tb. His struggle with his true/inner self is apparent as early as chapter one. ‘’You are not who you think you are, sir… which is lucky’’
He has lived a rough life, raised by criminals and surrounded by violence ever since he was born. It was installed in him early that his value lied within being a violent enforcer and he has lived this life since, knowing nothing else. As a highly aware person, Arthur's actions weight heavy on his soul. He accepts that his actions have consequences. He knows that a person who has caused so much suffering is not meant to have happiness in life. His way of life has caused him to believe that he is not worthy of love or redemption. He doesn’t want to believe that a person like him could be capable of any good. (a thing to note here is that imo, Arthur’s actions near his death weren’t attempts at redemption but rather a strong desire to do right and possibly be his true self.) This is why he keeps living as he does as it’s the only thing he’s ever known, it’s the thing that brings him profit, praise from the person he looks up to and he is already damned so he might as well continue living this life anyway.
The internal problem Arthur faces is that this violent, cruel way of life doesn’t align with what I’d call his true self/ideals. He is torn between the harsh reality he has known and an unconscious yearning for righteousness/love. To be able to carry on with his actions he must enforce certain ideals within himself, such as: I am bad, ugly, nasty, ignorant, mean etc. He also decides to see the dark side of reality, telling himself that the world is a grim dark place and this is just as things were meant to be. This is why he feels so uncomfortable being complimented for his good deeds, because a bad rotten person like him should not be able to do good. It breaks the image he has built for himself and he doesn’t want that happening. This can be seen a lot during the ‘’Money Lending and Other Sins’’ missions where he is unusually mean (even for his standards) to each of the debtors. Imo, he acts this way because he must truly convince himself of being a terrible man to be able to carry out a job which revolts him so badly. In the last debt collecting mission with J. John Weathers, it can be seen in his face/expressions how much he is struggling to put on a tough, uncaring, heartless act. He needs to maintain a ruthless persona to survive in the world he knows. He must convince himself of his own cruelty.
''Forgive me, but that's the problem. You don't know you.''
Contrary to Arthur’s beliefs, he is a naturally kind-hearted person who is unconsciously drawn towards kindness. And yes, even before he was diagnosed with tb. This can be seen in the people he respects the most and, in his willingness to help strangers (notice how he often does unnecessary acts of service for total strangers such as: carrying their things, holding out hands etc. even though they had already troubled him). Despite the life he has lived, Arthur does not enjoy violence, he does not enjoy hurting people. He doesn’t want to dominate over others. He thinks mostly about others and not about himself. This fact alone is very telling of his character.
He writes about Charles, a man who he truly respects: ‘’He’s a better man than me. He does not need to think to be good. It comes naturally to him, like right is deep within as opposed to this conflict between GOOD↔EVIL that rages within me.’’ A man who is not struggling with his inner self would not have written this. To me this clearly implies an inner desire to be a better man. He writes about his mentors: ‘’I love Dutch like a father, but in many ways, I love Hosea even more. He’s kind and fair and like a human being. Dutch is something else.’’ Clearly showing a preference for Hosea who is of a more gentle nature and shows genuine kindness. Unsurprisingly, these are the people who see through his dumb/though act and encourage him to drop it.
When he comes across Brother Dorkins for the first time, he writes: ‘’(he)was one of those innocent people who make you feel better about human beings and about yourself a little. Must be odd to see all that goodness in the world. Place always seemed dark and brutal to me.’’ Expressing how he does not see goodness in the world, implying lack of good examples/kindness/good experiences in his life. Yet, the monk leaves an impression and imo, this encounter (seeing genuine goodness) disrupts Arthur’s perception of what the world truly is. ‘’Just as evil begat evil your whole life long, so good may begat good’’ (what strengthens my belief in this, is the following, symbolic scene of Arthur realising the consequences of his actions right after picking up a crucifix. He was aware of them before sure, but is unable to truly ignore them now having seen it right in front of his eyes). If only Arthur was presented with more examples of goodness in his life.
''You have it in you... I can tell!''
His desire to do as much good as possible after realising he won’t live long is instant. This would not be the mindset of someone who did not already possess kindness in his heart. ‘’Know glory and forget about shame.’’ Arthur’s shame and self-loathing caused by his previous actions were what was holding him back from allowing kindness into his life. Knowing that he has limited time left has not made him into someone he wasn’t before. The diagnosis was a catalyst, allowing him to embrace that love/goodness truly does exist and accelerate the process of chipping away from the persona he has made for himself. This was a newfound understanding for him as in the past he was rejecting any notion of kindess. In himself and perhaps the whole existence of it. ‘’You keep hidden all that matters, even from yourself.’’
After being diagnosed, he writes: ‘’What kind of a man have I been? What kind of a man am I? What world is this we live in? A land of fury or a place of love? Am I being prepared for eternal damnation? Am I past any kind of saving? Is that all fairytales? Man ain’t got much good in him. I ain’t got no good in me… I don’t think and yet I see goodness. I see it. If not in me, in good folk. In Abigail and her love for Jack. In that silly monk. In Downes, I guess. Begging not for himself but for the poor, even though he was near starving himself. Maybe I don’t want salvation. Part of me has always longed for death.’’ This entry perfectly shows how deep Arthur’s self-loathing goes and just how much it has damaged him. As his journal allows a look into his true feelings, he truly does not see a single good thing about himself. He knew for a long time that the way he lives is detestable but he could not let go of it. Not because he didn’t want to, but because it’s all that he has ever known. He didn’t believe in anything else. This sudden acceptance of goodness has allowed him to see clearly, which was obscured from him before, and for the first time, enabled him to act free of past regrets for what is right.
⊹ ࣪ ⊹ ࣪ ⊹ ࣪ ⊹ ࣪ ⊹ ࣪ ⊹ ࣪ ⊹ ࣪ ⊹ ࣪ ⊹ ࣪ ⊹ ࣪ ⊹ ࣪ ⊹ ࣪ ⊹ ࣪ ⊹ ࣪ ⊹ ࣪ ⊹ ࣪ ⊹ ࣪ ⊹ ࣪ ⊹ ࣪ ⊹ ࣪ ⊹ ࣪ ⊹ ࣪ ⊹ ࣪ ⊹ ࣪
Arthur’s redemption is not about becoming a good man. It is about finding the strength to change and recognise your true self despite a lifetime of self-loathing and breaking free from destructive beliefs of the past.
In Arthurian legends a stag is a symbol of the unending quest of spiritual knowledge/enligtenment
"so how's hunting for gold bars going?"
oh...yknow...it's going
"maturing is realizing milton gave the gang a lot of chances to live their lives" uh well no actually, when he gave the gang that ultimatum of "get lost or die", he did so KNOWING that most, if not all of them would fail miserably at the task and that they would all be captured or killed as a result.
And yes, yes, I'm aware that Milton says "I don't want to kill ALL these people, Dutch. Just you." when he confronts Dutch at Clemens Cove, but let's look at some of the facts for a moment. Because some people make these insanely popular "hot takes" without even having a basic grasp of researching historical influence and despite the fact that I am not a scholar or a historian, this makes me very angry.
The Pinkerton Detective Agency in real life as it existed in 1899 WAS NOT THE SAME THING AS FEDERALLY EMPLOYED LAW ENFORCEMENT. Pinkerton agents did NOT possess the power to grant official pardons or waive outstanding criminal records. They operated more like private security or hired mercenaries.
In 1893, US Congress passed a bill known as the Anti-Pinkerton act, which barred the US government from employing Pinkertons and other private investigation forces on their behalf.
That hereafter no employee of the Pinkerton Detective Agency, or similar agency, shall be employed in any Government service or by any officer of the District of Columbia.
The Act was passed following the Homestead Strike which occurred the previous year, in 1892. Pinkertons had been called in to break up a strike put forth by Carnegie steelworkers lobbying for fair wages. Pinkerton involvement as strikebreakers resulted in a bloody battle and massacre between the two opposing forces, claiming the lives of up to 8 people and injuring at least three dozen others.
I'm not completely sure what's going on with this part of history in the context of RDR2. When Arthur first encounters Milton and Ross at the river, Milton claims that his status as an agent with the Pinkertons is "Seconded to the United States Government," but this would - again - not be possible, unless Rockstar had decided to create an alternate history in which the Anti-Pinkerton Act had never been passed, or had been enacted and removed sometime prior to the events of the game.
The nature of RDR2's wanted system treats Pinkertons as part of regular law enforcement, although Arthur will normally only be pursued by Pinkertons in free-roam when entering Great Plains or Tall Trees OR if he moves too close to a Pinkerton checkpoint/roadblock during Chapter 6. Otherwise, he is pursued by local law from the nearest town or settlement.
All of this means that even IF the gang had chosen to break up and go their separate ways when prompted to by Agent Milton, they probably would have still been fugitives of the law and from anyone who refused to honor whatever pardon they may have claimed was granted to them. County sheriffs and deputies employed under those sheriffs departments, state and federal marshals, THOSE are the law enforcement I'm talking about.
This seems to have been a fact-checking oversight on the writers' parts. When in doubt, we can say that some artistic liberties have been taken. Although RDR2 is a heavily detailed game and is filled to the brim with historically accurate discoveries, there are still plenty of fictional elements involved as well.
(I'm sorry but, as cool as that scene is, with Arthur standing on the oil wagon during the train heist , there is NO way that a train would have been able to stop in time to avoid hitting it. Especially not after coming around a turn at the speed it was going. That's a Hollywood invention. Same goes for blowing up jail cells with dynamite without somehow killing the prisoner you're trying to free.)
Also, one more thing, criminals changing their ways and integrating into civilized society takes a considerable amount of time and strong support systems in place to help them along. Many never receive this support and that's often where you will see people who are constantly getting in trouble with the law.
Giving a band of thieves 3 days to leave and perfectly assimilate into society when they are not used to living the way society expects them to is not "giving them plenty of chance." It is setting them up for failure. It is refusing to acknowledge that some of the gang members are far more disadvantaged than others and as a result some will have a much harder time getting anywhere or being successful.