I think the fact that we call that haircut “the Bieber” is stolen valor considering Zac Efron was already rocking that shit back when Justin Bieber was some random child in Ontario
cherry valley forever
todays bird
we're not kids anymore.

祝日 / Permanent Vacation

No title available
Stranger Things

⁂

shark vs the universe
🪼
$LAYYYTER
styofa doing anything

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
Keni
trying on a metaphor
Show & Tell
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year

pixel skylines
Jules of Nature

JVL

blake kathryn

seen from Germany
seen from India
seen from Poland

seen from United Arab Emirates
seen from Germany

seen from India
seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States
seen from Türkiye

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom

seen from China

seen from Malaysia

seen from Argentina

seen from Singapore
seen from Portugal
seen from Austria

seen from Germany
seen from Malaysia
@threads-now-now
I think the fact that we call that haircut “the Bieber” is stolen valor considering Zac Efron was already rocking that shit back when Justin Bieber was some random child in Ontario
vid i stole off reddit and feel like i need everyone to watch
This is a really fantastic return to form for this genre of post. In recent years there's been less and less effort put into this vital aspect of internet culture, it's nice to see a return to the truly artisanal work of the late 00s.
Now THIS is what the internet exists for. I was LOCKED IN the whole time.
she said do you homie i tell her only bartly i only love my marge and my lisa im sorry
Nothing in the world worse than a longtime friend whom you know deeply to be interesting thoughtful and brilliant meeting a man and devoting her life to his lesser plans. Remember how we used to resist
Sometimes you get a brief glimpse into the American worldview and decide that you don't want to know.
I cannot stress enough that this meme is entirely literal. there's no reference or subtext you don't know. these are simply the objectively most popular works of art from each denomination.
flicking back through my procreate library what the fuck was this
Things to look for in this:
Fish
Eyes
Body
The Constellations of Winter, Krzysztof Skrok
Planet Zoo guest thoughts have a very distinctive Energy. I don’t know how to describe it but i love it
Derelict Gothic Abbey ~ Jorge Carlos Gonzalez
I'm so tired of people who don't understand/care about the true effects of religion on people (especially young people, especially vulnerable people) speaking for religion. Like stop normalizing that shit.
If you're such an agnostic/atheist why are you not only okay with religious propaganda, but spreading it yourself? Your being neutral about religion always ends up benefitting religious people/institutions. Why are y'all not questioning this bias?
It's like y'all didn't grow up with it so it didn't fuck you up for life, and it didn't fuck up your siblings for life, and it didn't traumatize and ruin you on any level... And bc of that you're only willing to speak for religious freedom in the context of people being religious?
Why are you okay with religious freedom but not with freedom to not have religion?
Every time I hear ex-religious people discuss how horrible their experiences were, there's always some happy camper never-even-been-to-a-sermon/mass who wants to come and say everyone should have the right to believe whatever they believe.
Like sure, believe whatever you want, but the second your beliefs infringe on other people's human rights maybe it's time that we stop pretending that's acceptable and neutral in society.
People who grow up mostly culturally free of religion should see their privilege for what it is and ensure that others get the same luck in the future.
Not pretend that it's not dystopian to see churches post "demure" memes on TikTok, or that the Vatican's mascot is an anime character. These religious groups are trying to recruit children. They want to appeal to younger audiences. They want to brainwash more people so that they get to stay rich and powerful.
And while you chill and enjoy your secular Christmas/non-denominational Holiday party, there will be little kids being told that being gay is a sin, that women should be submissive to men and hide their bodies and not speak unless spoken to, and that serving god is more important than getting an education.
I have never understood why some people are lucky enough to be born with the chance that I had, to have this path in life, and why across the world there's a woman just like me, with the same abilities and the same desires, the same work ethic and love for her family, who would most likely make better films and better speeches, only she sits in a refugee camp and she has no voice. She worries about what her children will eat, how to keep them safe, and if they'll ever be allowed to return home. I don't know why this is my life and that's hers. I don't understand that. But I will do as my mother asked, and I will do the best I can with this life to be of use.
Angelina Jolie acceptance speech for the Jean Hersholt Humanitarian Award at the 2013 Governors Awards
We asked 1000 white women from the global north who adopt Girly Girl/It Girl/That Girl/I'm just a girl aesthetics if they think there's a direct correlation between outward appearance and moral goodness and trustworthiness. Their answers will not shock you even slightly
Marie Antoinette never made a single policy because despite her life of obscene luxury, she actually had little agency. Like many aristocratic women, she was a child bride that didn’t even speak French when she was given to the king of France the way you might give someone a horse.
Why is it that famed rapist and misogynist Donald Trump is being constantly compared to a woman with limited political power instead of ANY of the male aristocrats that built the system that exploited the poor? You people can’t even conjure up King Louis XVI?
I hate the ubiquity of the hate for Marie Antoinette. She was SOLD TO A MAN AT ELEVEN YEARS OLD. She was an 18th century princess, she had no agency, let alone control of the actions of the crown. She was little more than a bargaining chip. And she was so, so kind and gentle. She apologized to her executioner for stepping on his foot. She could not have been more "perfect" when examined against the expectations for princesses of her day, and she is still universally reviled.
She doesn't deserve it. She was just a little girl, and then a woman, trying to survive like any other in a world where she was literally property of the most powerful men in the world. She had a son, she did her duty, and she was killed for it all anyway.
While i agree with the criticism of which monarchs get the focus in mainstream discussion, the claim that she's a passive victim of circumstance and not an influential reactionary actor is plain old historical revisionism and royalist apologia, absolving people on the premise that they could only act within the confines of their position in a way that did not threaten them really doesn't get you far, and that's if we concede to the asinine and historically inapplicable claim that she could somehow be a relatively less harmless royalist agent.
While the claim that she was "nice??????" Is completely irrelevant??????! People don't hate her because she was impolite.
Can we please not spit in the graves of all proto-feminist republican Revolutionaries by calling Antoinette "just a little girl"?
Idk what else to say about her when she was, again, sold at eleven years old, when she was actually just a little girl. Also, when it was claimed that she said "let them eat cake" she would have been 9 years old, also a little girl.
I really don't think it's "Royalist apologia" to acknowledge that women were property to the men of aristocracy at the time, and indeed to men generally, including the king.
You can't convince me that a woman who started life as a disappointment for not being male, was sold as a child, moved across the continent as a child, and was then serially raped until pregnant as a child, had any sort of agency, because she didn't. She was a victim. She survived to the best of her ability, and she was murdered for it.
And proto-feminist revolutionaries did nothing to prevent her from being falsely accused of sexually abusing her son in court, or when her best friend's head was cut off and then paraded outside of her window on a pike to torment her for weeks. Revolutionaries murdered a woman and used her remains to torment another woman.
Very feminist.
Also, I know it's nitpicky but Marie-Antoinette never said "let them eat cake".
The original is "qu'ils mangent de la brioche" which was a joke/saying in France before she was even born (it's actually the punchline, not the full thing). Historians disagree on the original saying (where it came from and what it referenced) but we know with 100% certainty that it had nothing to do with Marie-Antoinette.
It's unknown when exactly this saying was first associated with her in general culture, it might have been while she was queen as she was a violently hated one. Rumours and caricatures of a violent and sexual nature about her were already being shared in 1774 when she was only 19 (she was looked down upon because she still wasn't pregnant, even though we know it was her husband who didn't want to consummate the marriage). But it might also have been associated with her later, she wasn't really more popular dead than alive.
fellas is it royalist propaganda to say that Marie Antoinette was a victim of something that is considered slavery by actual anti slavery organisations today
Oh, no, you see when it happens to women/girls (🤢🤮) it's totally fine.
At its heart, American conservatism is a fantasy. It’s a vision of a world too evil to be saved or cared about, and fearsome enough to justi
Good enough to quote in its entirety, all credit to its author Albert Burneko
At its heart, American conservatism is a fantasy. It's a vision of a world too evil to be saved or cared about, and fearsome enough to justify any and every impulse toward cruelty and violence that a person might have. A world resolutely unworthy of knowing, except as a danger. A world in which you will always need a gun, and to shoot somebody with it, instead of just lusting for both. Because the world isn't actually like that—because, in general, people are just people, and mostly want to live peaceably and get along with each other—most American conservatives must mainline Fox News (or Newsmax, or whatever) directly to their brains at all hours in order to remain within the fantasy that both sustains and degrades them. In this respect, Dick Cheney got luckier than most American right-wingers could ever dream. Fanatics with brown skin crashed commercial jet airliners into the World Trade Center and Pentagon, at a time when, as vice president under the harebrained and banally evil George W. Bush, Cheney for all practical purposes ran the most lethal death-dealing apparatus in the history of the world. He got to spend seven years deciding who the bad guys were and how to kill them. He got to scrawl the simplest possible moral calculus across the world in blood. He lived the dream. This is the Mega Millions jackpot for the American conservative. This is the golden ticket to Willy Wonka's Chocolate Factory. No one has ever welcomed their firstborn child to the world with greater joy than that with which the American reactionary greets a Pearl Harbor, a 9/11, a dead cop, an assassinated YouTube bigot. Dick Cheney's celebration lasted more than 20 years; by the time it ended—to the extent it ever did—a crucial portion of American civil liberties had gone with it. More than half a million Iraqis were dead. Against the sheer scale of that mountain of corpses, it seems almost ghoulish to mention that Cheney, more than any other person, brought us today's political reality. He did, though; the American conservative project, the old dream of making the world into a place awful enough to justify American conservatism, never had a better champion. He was a shamelessly self-dealing con man, for one thing: Chosen as a trusted associate of the elder George H. W. Bush to lead the search for the right running-mate for George W., Cheney picked himself, and then ran the Iraq War as a monumental graft machine for his Halliburton oil company and as many cronies as could be dealt in. The nature of Cheney's con—aided by its contrast against Donald Rumsfeld's burlesque vamping, John Ashcroft's spiral-eyed eschatological lunacy, and the president's plain brainlessness—was a thin performance of steely, flinty-eyed competence laid over arrogance, ignorance, and ineptitude. He wrecked everything he touched, and was wrong in all of his predictions and analyses, and as a result completely discredited America's respectable establishment. Along the way, he played white America's (and mainstream media's) Islamophobia and bloodlust like arcade joysticks, to rearguard each next extension of authoritarianism and paint the administration's critics as traitors. His vileness and cynicism were corrosive, and have by now more or less fully eaten through every surface and institution exposed to them. Cheney, that is to say, gave Donald Trump a template for looting the government and for what to run against and for who to scapegoat and how. In 2024, Cheney endorsed Kamala Harris's presidential candidacy and denounced Trump as a grave threat to democracy. You could almost laugh, or cry. He died on Monday, aged 84. What do you do with a life like his, at its end? Shiver at the thought of it, mostly. Bury him in a salt cavern. Bury him face down.