wine & dine

shark vs the universe
occasionally subtle

Love Begins
d e v o n

Discoholic 🪩

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
Monterey Bay Aquarium
★
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
The Stonewall Inn
Doug Jones
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
art blog(derogatory)
hello vonnie

gracie abrams
Mike Driver

tannertan36

#extradirty
One Nice Bug Per Day
seen from Venezuela

seen from United States

seen from Cameroon
seen from Canada
seen from Canada
seen from Iraq

seen from United States

seen from Brazil
seen from Venezuela

seen from Brazil
seen from Malaysia
seen from Iraq
seen from United States

seen from Belarus

seen from Netherlands

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Iraq

seen from Austria
@towritewithoutwords
wine & dine
yeah
xenomorp good friend for baby
so many things happen how are u supposed to get over all of them
“do we think maybe a vegetable would cause less despair” still living in my head rent free
skill issue
all these new “eat the rich” movies
don't talk to me or my 300 pornbot followers ever again
He’s fishing
i hope he never catches anything
What is your FUCKING PROBLEM
A fundamental part of transandrophobia is the fact that its extremely difficult to fit trans men into the categories we have.
We have the categories of "man" and "woman", with men being dominant, in control, and powerful, and women not. These categories have historically been exclusive to cis people, but now we have transfeminism. Trans women are very clearly not a dominant, in control, powerful group in society, and they are women, so its very easy to fit them in to the existing framework. Men are still in power and women still aren't, its just that "women" now includes both women and the cooler women.
But trans men are harder to fit in. In trans-accepting feminism, trans men are accepted as men. But trans men are not a group that is dominant, in control, and powerful in society. We don't have trans men making laws, or being popular newscaster who can sway public opinion. Stories are not written with the "trans male gaze", as trans men are not expected to be the viewer. Trans men are not seen by society at large as especially trustworthy, likable, people that should be listened to.
So, to keep that framework intact, you either have to say that trans men are women and ignore their identity, or you have to say that trans men are men and therefore in power. Neither of these answers are good for trans men, and neither accurately describe trans men's place in society. Because while trans men are affected by misogyny, trans men have experiences of gender and sexual oppression that cis women don't. And nonbinary people, too, are shafted here; nonbinary people aren't a dominant group, but many are not women and many were not assigned female at birth. What do you do with that? (Well, just start lumping them with women, it seems).
This is why I feel the thing we need is a proper restructuring of how we view gendered oppression. We are trying to operate trans existence through cis technology. Right now, in trans-affirming feminism, it seems that if you experience some sort of gendered oppression, you are seen as a de facto woman until you can't be. Cissexism and binarism is still dominating our perspectives, even when we are "trans-affirming", because we are still unwilling to change our framework to adjust for trans experiences.
#trans women dont fit into the framework as easily as might be implied here however
Adding this on because it is important to acknowledge. Trans women being able to be fit into the cissexist narrative does not mean that they are unconditionally welcomed, especially in feminist spaces dominated by cis women. Many cis feminists will happily put "trans women are women" in their bio and talk a lot of talk, but will still be transmisogynistic and hostile to trans women who aren't the ideal thin, white, passing, binary femme they think best represents transfems. And again, this is specifically cis feminism that portrays itself as trans-affirming, and there are very much feminists who do not do this at all.
I think a lot of cis feminists end up pitting transmascs and transfems against each other, with a lot of "trans-accepting" cis feminists virtue signaling with transfems and demonizing transmascs, and many TERFs trying to lure in transmascs to demonize transfems. In both of these cases, that "support" is often extremely dependent on how palatable the trans person is for the cis feminist's agenda. A trans woman who acts or exists in the "wrong" way can and will be ripped apart for it.
Cis-centric feminism isn't good for any trans person at the end of the day. It either relies on demonizing us (any of us) as Evil Males of the Patriarchy, or turning us into obedient icons to prop up cis beliefs. There are trans people who lean into this because it feels good to be approved of by cis people, but we need to resist that.
"ooooh nooooo but a rail strike around the holidays could cripple the economy" damn sounds like their labor is really really important and you should give them what they fucking want
Andrej Dugin
Hamlet, Prince of Denmark [detail], 2014
Me @ myself anytime I open my mouth:
happy first Bella From Twilight Depression Month
happy second Bella From Twilight Depression Month
happy last Bella From Twilight Depression Month