A bad summary of Eminence Series by @nyxharpy
A ragtag team consisting of a seer who gets visions from the gods, a slutty drunk, a manipulative bitch, and a sad boy in love with said seer participating in treason.
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"

No title available

Kiana Khansmith
𓃗
Sweet Seals For You, Always
Keni
Fai_Ryy

roma★

No title available
The Bright Sessions
Mike Driver
taylor price
art blog(derogatory)

blake kathryn
tumblr dot com
The Stonewall Inn
Cosimo Galluzzi
The Bowery Presents
h
noise dept.

seen from United States

seen from China
seen from Brazil
seen from Thailand

seen from India
seen from India

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Venezuela
seen from United States
seen from Pakistan

seen from Singapore

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from Ecuador
seen from Malaysia
seen from Venezuela
seen from Colombia

seen from Canada
@trapped-inadystopianovel
A bad summary of Eminence Series by @nyxharpy
A ragtag team consisting of a seer who gets visions from the gods, a slutty drunk, a manipulative bitch, and a sad boy in love with said seer participating in treason.
the aetieriana - imperial & noble titles
wctd worldbuilding
-> Template by @esspecn-a | psd colorings by tuschen
imperial titles.
Vasilier - the absolute monarch of the Aetierian Empire, head of state and the temples of Aetier. They are known by many epitaphs: the fire-wreathed, glory-touched, areia-blessed. All who have held this title have, in their own way, survived the treacherous Agonia to wear the crown upon their head. A bloody baptism to mark their ascendance to near godhood in the eyes of man.
---- Addressed as "Your Imperial Majesty," the current bearer of this title is Dantalion vi Aetier'
Vasili - the primary spouse of the Vasilier, their equal and opposite, the neck that ever supports the head. In influence and power in governance, there is little that can match the one with the ear of ruler. They are also the head of the Imperial Harem.
---- Addressed as "Your Imperial Majesty," this seat has remained empty since the death of Titania of Taul
Reilma-Imperessor | Reilma-Imperessa - the heirs of the realm, this is given to the imperial scions that have been granted an Ascension and are acknowledged in their capabilities to rule. It is a coveted title-- and also one of the most dangerous ones to have.
---- Addressed as "Your Illustrious Highness," as of yet the only bearer of this title is Charles Valerius
Kaisarim - the title given to imperial heirs who have been granted an area to govern. Though not required, this title is typically given along the same time as an heir's Ascension.
---- Addressed as "Your Most Excellent Highness" or "Your Excellency", the current holders of this title is Fenice Eucleia and Charles Valerius
Imperessor | Imperessa - A title given to the children of the Vasilier.
---- Addressed as "Your Imperial Highness" or simply "Your Highness," the current holders of this title are Fenice Eucleia, Charles Valerius, Euphemia Helena, Konstantine Leo, and Basil Nikodemus
Imperessor-Syngenis - Given to the sibling of the Vasilier, a title that speaks of great survival and one with a history of great woe. Rarely does a Vasilier-hopeful leave a sibling alive on their quest for power, even full-blooded ones. One must wonder what they have promised to keep their head in the new regime.
---- Addressed as "Your Most Serene Highness" or "Your Serenity," the only bearer of this title is Andras vi Drochona.
Members of the Serarium/the Imperial Harem
Consort-Prima - the highest ranking consort of the harem in the abscence of the Vasili. They help manage the Serarium, maintain order and harmony among consorts, and oversee the upbringing of all imperial children.
---- Addressed as "Illustrious Lord/Lady" the bearer of this title is Illysandre vi Soresi.
Consort - a member of the harem
---- Addressed as "Your Grace," those who hold these ranks are Titania of Taul, Illysandre vi Soresi, Eudocia vi Kallystos, Adelheid of Reisenberg, and Aurelia of Aranthia
Noble titles - Hereditary
Dux - a title awarded to the eight houses of the Evgenii, the original eight families that pledged their allegiances to Kaelstansa the Great and aided im the creation of the empire. They are also given an honorary seat among the Archons of the Synedrion.
---- Addressed as "Honored Lord," the holders of this title are the heads of the eight great houses: Soresi, Lascaris, Kallystos, Mellisenus, Basilicus, Artesia, Diasorenos, Estelle
Noble titles - Non-hereditary
Kyri - Awarded to those who serve in high levels of government of have done great service to the crown.
---- Addressed simply as "Lord," though most holders of this title prefer to be addressed by their position in government.
Taglist under the cut (ask to be +/-)
when I say “Let me ask my husband”, one (or both) of these things is taking place:
1. I am in a loving, happy relationship where we value and respect each other’s opinion
2. I am using this as an excuse to get out of something I don’t want to do (sorry habibi)
what is not happening here: I am being oppressed
3. Brother I Have No Idea What Is Happening Let Me Consult My Trusted Advisor
One day I shall be that trusted advisor
"My liege you cannot attend that gathering, you have promised that evening to rituals of appeasement" (you promised you would rest and take some time just for yourself)
"My liege, there are worrying rumors about their trust and capability" (Last time they tried to plan something, it fell apart and you had to plan it last minute)
"My liege, you MUST attend to maintain diplomatic standing!" (You haven't seen your friends in a month and are saying you miss them every day, SAY YOU WILL GO)
You know, I made this post with a very specific context (how people see me, a married muslim lady in a hijab, and automatically assume I’m oppressed) but all these additions are absolutely sending me and the notes are delightful so by all means, please continue
“Tumblr age verification will not be needed,” tumblr staff stated upon confirming every single blog on the site is more than 10 years old.
“If you were literate enough to be posting about Johnlock in 2015 we can kind of just assume you’re good,” staff elaborated even though we did not ask them to.
I love how whenever ATLA recognizes Sokka is smart enough to solve a problem but it’d be too fast they just stick him in some kind of situation. Like he COULD’VE stopped jet from drowning a town so they tied him up and dumped him in a forest. He COULD’VE figured out what that spirits deal was so they lost him in the spirit world for 24 hours.
One time they just stuck him in a hole in the ground for a whole episode.
This is how writers should deal with characters who are too smart for the arc instead of making them suddenly dumber for no apparent reason.
If you frequently find yourself in random situations while your friends happen to be experiencing problems maybe you, too, are too smart for the narrative.
My favorite is that Sokka absolutely would've just navigated them out of the desert, so they had to put him on acid the entire time.
i need authors or publishing companies to figure out how to write good summaries for fantasy. you do not need to introduce all the vocab terms of this world, you need to give the audience an interesting hook. Like, random names and scenarios pulled out of a hat, "Asmand is on the run for a murder he did not commit. Or, at least he's pretty sure he didn't" is a lot stronger a hook than "Asmand is on the run from The Council of Nine Elders for killing the Svelah, the eldest of them all, while under a Trayenas, a mythical trance emparted on him by Blyth"
Fantasy Guide to Royal Crisis from Inner Strife to Coups and Regicide
The idea of harmony within royal spheres is probably one of the concepts that as an auidence outside we don’t always fall for. Royal families and dynasties will attempt to show united fronts, sweep any hint of discourse and strife under the carpet in order to maintain that idea. A broken wall is more likely to crumble and collpase, less likely to defend against any assault from the outside. And very often, the attacks and discourse come from within.
Why the Cracks Begin Inside
If you pay attention to modern coverage of royal families, you will be presented with tales of in-fighting, of brothers squabbling over titles, younger siblings abusing their privileges, arguments over housing and spats over titles. Families argue, it is normal, but within royal circles, tensions and stakes are often raised. Fortunes, estates, grand titles, responsibilities and privileges are often the source of argument, with relatives fighting with the Crown over what they feel they are owed or deserve in relation to these things. It is in the monarch’s disgression to give or take but also in them to weigh up different situations and the impact of allowing their relatives access to these powers, for example, you wouldn’t give a loaded gun to the brother who has been eyeing up your crown or you wouldn’t allow an aunt who doesn’t support you to go abroad an act as your representative. But on the other hand, a smart monarch will not be a miser with honours or lands or titles as it would often tempt relatives to take what they wish or work with those who would give it to them. There is also the possibility of the Monarch being paranoid and suspecting innocent relatives of being guilty of betrayal or coveting the Crown. Take away from this is trust who you must but always keep family close.
When the Die is Cast
There is sometimes no preventing the betrayal of relatives within a royal unit. Slights, imagined or real, often turn to wounds and nursed wounds will often lead to cousins, siblings, aunts or uncles, even children acting out. This can come in the form of gathering supporters to intimate the Crown or even attack it or begin to court a foreign power or enemy in the effort to threaten the Crown into bending or at least coming to the table to discuss matters. However, this isn’t always based on greed from the betrayer, sometimes, the betrayer feels there is no choice but to fight against the Crown for their survival against real or even precieved threats. These betrayals can break out into war but most disagreements can trigger exiles from the country or the court, the frosty relations between relatives and family units which can create social schisms among the nobility and sometimes even tank the popularity of the monarchy especially if the strife impacts the population through war or violence or derails trust in the government or monarch.
When Worse comes to Worse
Like I said above, the arguments and disputes and petty distrust between royalty can lead to war. There have been numerous examples throughout history of ambitious heirs trying for a throne or attempting to topple an unpopular monarch or supporting the invasion of foreign powers in order to gain even more more or influence. But an united front plagued by rumours of fighting and mistrust between its key members also attracts ideas of weakness. If a brother to a king doesn’t support them or even listen to them, then why should the nobles or commons? If a King doesn’t trust his daughter who is the next heir, why should anybody obey her? And if the royal family is that fractured, that dead set on fighting each other and they don’t even trust each other, and if they are that petty to their own family, why would the population and those abroad respect the monarchy at once. An unstable monarchy sows even more discord and danger, monarchies who do not pull together will fall together.
Results and Just Deserts
All family disagreements and in-fighting results in some sort of ending. Either the baby who throws all their toys out of the pram gets what they are crying for or they get a telling off. A traitor is humbled by the removal of privileges and honours, shut out of the tight royal circle. They may even face life long imprisonment or even a period of exile. Or if the spat has been particularly bloody and dangerous, death. Either the death of the monarch, which would lead to the country falling into some form of civil war or the execution of the guility party either through beheading, assassination, poison or a vat of malmsey wine. The execution of said party would still have fallout results, their heirs and children would lose everything including lands and certain titles and may even face imprisonment themselves. The killing of a family member who came against the monarch or at least posed a threat, gives the monarch two things: a reputation of ruthlessness but also a reputation of being able to take care of business.
Fantasy Guide to International Relations
When writing fantasy, geopolitics is an element that shows up often. How nations interact with one another, how they create alliances or how they handle tense situations with each other. How nations behave with each other and communiticate with one another can effect your overall plot and character situations.
Receipts
With any story, you have to go back to the beginning to understand any relationship. Kingdoms who have had past history of war or invasion or colonisation may act more wary around each other. Kingdoms who have aided each other in the past might tend to side with each other over matters. International Relations are not unlike interpersonal relations in the fact that if trust is a foundation, then much is possible in the ways of alliances and any betrayal is far more impactful. If trust was not there at the start, then an alliance will be difficult to form.
Quid Pro Ho
The thing about international politics especially in a fantasy setting is that there's no such thing as black and white. Countries deal with each other out of necessity even if they are ideologically removed from one another or have a history, one country will have something the other needs, be it military support, political support or resources.
Entering into a Political Alliance
A political alliance is when two or more nations agree to work together or support each other. An alliance is agreement like a contract, which lays out the demands of each nation when entering an agreement, what they expect of one another, rules of engagement between one another and instances where they would be compelled to act on the others behalf. However, on both sides, there are situations where it might compel them to be a bit more pragmatic. For example, if Kingdom A had an alliance with Kingdom B, they may demand military support on the threat of war from their neighbour Kingdom C but if Kingdom B has a fairly good relationship with C and doesn’t wish to cause a war but it will promise to stand up for them in a political sense, it isn’t exactly a great deal but it is better than nothing. Every political alliance is based on necessity rather than just need and or even on the basis that they even like each other. It is about survival or stability in the long run, protection from other nations. Political alliances shift over time and may be broken off for bigger or better things. It isn’t a friendship though it is framed like that in media. It is a contract, an agreed set of terms of how the nations behave with one other, how they behave with other nations and what both nations can get off one other.
Trade Alliances
In making a trade alliance, like I said above, it is all based on the idea of you scratch my back, I scratch yours. To make any set of trading agreements, one has to be prepared to get taken to the cleaners as well as strike gold. Trade is basically an exchange of goods and services, one person is getting something in return for giving another. If Country A has a wealth of forests such as oak to build ships, Country B might enter a trade deal to recieve the wood for a set price based on its market value however, if Country A suspects that the wood might be used to build ships or weapons that could be used against them or an ally, Country A might charge B a steeper price, akin to a tax. Trade alliances can occur between allies but also foes, though trade will be strictly limited in some situations, due to embargoes on certain items or higher tax on items and services. The need to generate wealth and trade often transcends little things like politics but the government would decide which nations its citizens will sell and buy from, who they will trade with and if they will enter into agreements. From a political standpoint point, trade agreements have to take into consideration of two things: need of the consumer and protection of national trade. If it is cheaper to purchase some goods such as silk abroad and Kingdom X has an industry in silk, Kingdom X would impose a higher tax and tarriff on foreign silk coming into the country.
Communication Between Nations
In another post, I spoke about the role of ambassadors as it corrolates to the communication between nations. Ambassadors are the main line of communication between nations, a physical being of go-betwee who is charged with the passing along of messages and dispatches. Ambassadors like I said can be seen as physical manifestations of the nation they serve and how they are treated and welcomed or if indeed they are at all, is a direct response to how one nation views its relationship with another. Ambassadors aren’t the only figures involved in diplomacy. Sometimes heads of state will communicate face to face on state visits or at summits or they will maintain communication through letters or telephone but this is sometimes dictated by the government though heads of state and even their families can maintain personal correspondence with one another (though in times of war or strife, it is not recommended). Gestures speak louder than words when communicating. Keeping a channel of communication between nations open is a gesture of “I’m willing to hear you “ whilst expelling ambassadors is the equivalent of slamming your flip phone closed during an argument. A smart nation would always keep communication open in order to remain informed even through times of tension. That isn’t to say all communication is official or even known to the parties. Letters, dispatches, reports, telephone calls, cables, telegrams and other ways of education might be opened or intercepted or tapped in order to gain information that usually would not be available or information that has been hidden for a sinister reason. Spies are not exactly seen as fair play but it would be a mistake to think that they don’t exist. Spies can be anybody from either trained individuals who are sent into nations to gather information or they can be people within the nation such as politicians or even staff paid or threatened or persuaded to pass along information.
Perception
If you look at today’s media and back to historical pamphlets and newspapers, you can glean clear as crystal who is a country’s ally, who is a foe and who is sort of on the fence. The media of nations who are at odds with each other will often lean into stereotypes of each other or they will outright slander each other or take stances against them because that is the status quo. The media may depict the citizens of that nation in unflattering light, exaggerating features or characteristics or propaganda highlighting past agressions or mistakes. Nations who are political allies might shape headlines of depictions of their allies in flattering lights in order to mould the hearts and minds of people so they will look favourably on that nation’s actions, say for example if an Invader/Occupier were slaughtering civilians in hospitals or in safe zones or systematically committing what can only be coined as an outright genocide than their allies would depict Invader/Occupier’s actions as justified or as mistakes while placing the blame on those civilians. It’s plain propaganda and bullshit but it feeds from the machine of alliances. This doesn’t even have to leak into media, it can manifest through a standpoint of civilians, they may view their allied nation in a better light then those that are their enemy and may even treat their enemy with hostility on the back of the political standpoint of their nations - this of course depends on individuals but it is safe to say that sometimes one can get swept up into the narratives peddled by the media and one’s government. Perception is a delicate balance between sculpted truth and the facts that are black and white. And even after things are made fine and dandy between nations, sometimes lingering resentments do remain.
Cycle of Life
To believe that one nation will always be friends with another or they will always hate each other would be nice and neat in theory but frankly impossible. The needs, desires, limitations and power of nations dwindles and rises like the sun and nobody knows what can happen over the course of centuries. Old enemies such as the French and English would never have been put on the same side of a major global war, but it happened in the 20th century sometimes on the same fields they fought the Hundred Years War. Allies cannot always remain friendly, this is not Ru Paul’ Best Friend Race, this is a struggle to survive and to build something everlasting, alliances will break due to betrayal or need to get the next best thing. Fair or unfair, it happens. It is the reality of life and politics. Nothing good or bad lasts. Nations have to keep moving to survive and if that is over the backs of former allies, handclasped with an old enemy in order to save themselves and protect their borders, it will have to be done.
Fantasy Guide: Why Revolutions Happen
I’m often asked about revolutions and their duration in the context of a revolution against a specific monarchy or government style and I thought I would discuss these why revolutions typically begin.
Leadership
The main thought when you think about revolutions is very often related to the leadership of the nation or place where the revolution is occuring. Leadership can be anything from oppressive to idealogically incompatable to the masses or simply weak or inept. This doesn’t only include monarchies chosen by divine or blood right, this can also include democratically elected governments that either no longer align with the nation’s beliefs and ideals but also elected governments that fail to provide the basic foundations - food, contentment, protection etc. Revolutions can occur after a string of follies prepatrated by the targeted figure or governing body, there is usually no such thing as a sudden revolution that begins after one event. There will be build up, sometimes subtle or overt, but there will be a chain of events stretching back beyond memory of why these things are occuring.
Economics
Revolutions often have basis in economies. Shortages in available jobs, shortages in basic needs such as clean water or substantial food will often be citied as the spark of unwanted trouble amongst the poorest factions. A bad economy will often increase taxation, putting a drain on already strained finances. Rents would increase, costs of medicine and food would climb and it might compell people to leave the countryside for work in the city which may not be available. Skilled workers may even leave the country in search of work and better opportunities elsewhere. But a lack in a stable economy can also effect the well off, such as taxation and having to price items and services at a higher or lower rate to get by and attract business which may make them as unpopular as the cause of the revolution.
Emergence of New Ideas and Sensibilities
Sometimes the population of a country will be influenced by new ways of thinking. The emergence of an awakened population who will start demanding new and outlandish rights such as fair and equal pay or governmental support in times of crisis or even a say in how their country is run. An educated population is not going to swallow down stories of divine right or that they themselves are inferior. An educated population is one that is going to push back, ask questions and hold opinions that challenge the status quo. The population may even feel that certain ways of thinking are outdated and wish to change the nature of the nation’s heart, the population of a former military power might want more peace and trade and an oppressive regime might foster ideas of individuality amongst the dissident. A nation might think its government has grown too soft for example, that they might be betraying ideals held dear by the nation as a whole, for example the idea that the next door nation can become an ally after years of war and strife and violence. On the flipside, they might disagree with the country’s actions such as if they have engaged in a long war that seemingly has no immediate outcome or resolution, that has put a drain on income and lives that once was popular may now be seen to have been a waste of life. Disillusionment is just as dangerous as oppression.
Revolutions have Two Sides
Revolutions aren’t always the time of great change for everybody. A great paper was I recently reading paraphased the old addage that “one man’s terrorist is another’s freedom fighter” and discussed the idea that one man’s target was another man’s victim. Revolutions are rarely peaceful and it is rarely able to avoid the shedding of “innocent” blood. Civilians can be shot in cross fires between the government and the revolutionaries, revolutions can cause an increase on stranglehold of regulations, they can also create an environment of violence, distrust and harship. Revolutionaries tend to target transport, food snd weapon production, this would place regular workers in danger, it would hamper the movement of people not just for usual business but also for those seeking medical aid. Revolutions don’t just target leaders, it targets places and targets groups of people who may not have a direct hand in how things are ran and just may support them, either blindly or out of fear or just out of person preference. It is not to say that revolutions are inherently bad, it is that they are not wholly bright and clean. A revolution demands sarcrifice, it demands payment in destruction, blood and violence to achieve its end goals.
The Lost Prince | Alphabet | F is for Fake
Fake [noun]: an object or person that is made to look real or valuable in order to deceive - Cambridge Dictionary
---------------------------------------------------
‘Pretender or not, he knows what to say and how to act. He even looks like the real deal, they say.’
None of this makes sense. If this… person is a pretender like Kiva says, he is either a conman or so delusional, he has no idea how dangerous his lies are. He’s suicidal or extremely desperate.
---------------------------------------------------
‘So, you don’t think he’s real?’
‘I think that if I were a Prince with assassins after me, I wouldn’t do something like this.’ Hadrien gestures at the headline, writ so bold and black I can clear see it across the empty bar. Assembly Welcomes the Vastian Crown Prince.
‘The Ruby is doing odds on whether the Prince is the real deal and if he is – whether he will marry one of the heiresses. This could be bigger than the races.’
‘Haven’t you had enough betting, Felix?’
Felix flushes, his bruised cheek darkening as he drops his gaze.
‘What do you make of it?’ Hadrien asks me directly, closing the paper. ‘Fake or real?’
---------------------------------------------------
TLP Taglist
@reignnyx @writinglyra @pressedpapyrus @serpentarii @thevintagelover @seas-dubh @dameschnee123 @donutwithinadonut @mikaelsona @giuliawritesanddoeskpop @sunaora @mayawritesbooks @veneritia @trapped-inadystopianovel @hysteriwah @mothertaemresa @rise-again-2001 @underwoodinc @seamaiden @writer-somewhat @lord-fallen @writingoflarka @ashen-crest @pen-and-inks @strawstories @nerdygoblin @ortolon @chigyowastaken @residentofthedisc @elysianluv @lividdreamz @ladywithoringes @imawriternotamathematician @writeblrfantasy @ginghampearlsnsweettea @spicysequoia @ethereal-puppet @carmensapientia @snapdragoncrown @thats-my-type-writer @intellectualintelligent @uhkayshuhmae x @rosemarys-for-remembrance @looking-for-the-stories @asingledropofwinter @queengiuliettafirstlady @gwensparlour @miladydreams @iespeciallyme @princess-summershine @six-1mpossiblethings @kaeiguess @smolandweirdwriter @stea-ultimea
The Lost Prince | Alphabet | E is for Entitled
---------------------------------------------------
Born in the purple, he may not be legitimate but the Heimi don't care about that, he's as much a little Prince as that one is.
---------------------------------------------------
"He was an expensive choice." Fyodor says to Art who shrugs as if that can explain away the dying throes of Hadrien's rant.
---------------------------------------------------
Hadrien doesn’t react, his eyes combing the room. Even among us, everything about him gives away his birth, a sore thumb if ever there was one. ‘At least pretend that you care they came.’
---------------------------------------------------
‘That’s fine. I can sell this for passage,’ Hadrien removes a gold signet ring on his finger, holding it up. Worth more than a ticket, but I suppose he doesn't know it. ‘My father be damned.’
---------------------------------------------------
TLP Taglist
@reignnyx @writinglyra @pressedpapyrus @serpentarii @thevintagelover @seas-dubh @dameschnee123 @donutwithinadonut @mikaelsona @giuliawritesanddoeskpop @sunaora @mayawritesbooks @veneritia @trapped-inadystopianovel @hysteriwah @mothertaemresa @rise-again-2001 @underwoodinc @seamaiden @writer-somewhat @lord-fallen @writingoflarka @ashen-crest @pen-and-inks @strawstories @nerdygoblin @ortolon @chigyowastaken @residentofthedisc @elysianluv @lividdreamz @ladywithoringes @imawriternotamathematician @writeblrfantasy @ginghampearlsnsweettea @spicysequoia @ethereal-puppet @carmensapientia @snapdragoncrown @thats-my-type-writer @intellectualintelligent @uhkayshuhmae x @rosemarys-for-remembrance @looking-for-the-stories @asingledropofwinter @queengiuliettafirstlady @gwensparlour @miladydreams @iespeciallyme @princess-summershine @six-1mpossiblethings @kaeiguess @smolandweirdwriter @stea-ultimea
Fantasy Guide to the Servant Dynamic
I often get asks about the relationship between servants and those they serve and how the relationship develops over time or what's appropriate between servant and employer at any given time. Many period dramas do get this right but a lot don't and send mixed signals to the audience about the true nature of the relationship between servant and employer.
There's a Strict Hierarchy
This is one inescapable concept that often gets forgotten in a lot of modern media. The relationship between servant and employer is a hierarchal one, the employer and servant are not on the same level socially.
Servants will always address their employer by their title or by sir/ma'am - at least in public and if there is any deviation of the rule, it's in private and only at the invitation of the employer themselves. Employers in turn would use the appropriate title for the servant in question (I outline these here). This done very well in Downton Abbey, especially when Tom marries into the family and they struggle with calling him 'Tom' rather than Branson.
A servant would never greet their employer informally or answer back. This is inaccurately portrayed in the exchange between Mrs Russell and Turner in The Gilded Age.
Servants would also not address their employer directly without being addressed first. This is very single meeting.
Servants would not walk in step with their employer or sit in their presence. They would walk two or three steps behind at all times and only sit when invited. They would not touch their employer without leave either. This is done well in Queen Charlotte, with Brimsley.
A servant would have to obey orders from another member of their employer's family or their guest but only within reason. This is shown in The Gilded Age the lady's maid Adelheid is borrowed by Mrs Russell from her daughter for a time when she fires her own maid.
Above and Beyond
Some employers might expect more from their servants that aren't exactly in the job description. It was understood in service that sometimes you would be asked to tackle things not in one's paygrade. In Queen Charlotte, Lady Danbury's maid Coral helps her lady lie about the death of Lord Danbury to allow her time to gather herself and appear more upset. For example:
A lady's maid might act as messenger between a pair of lovers.
A footman might lie to the mistress about the whereabouts of his master (with the master's approval of course)
A butler might procure some less than legal party favours for a bash his lord and lady are throwing.
A guardsman might aid their charge in escaping the house/palace for a night of fun.
No matter what, a servant is expected to go above and beyond without complaint. The response to "jump" should nearly always be "how high". However, if there is a strange or harmful request, a servant had recourse to ask a higher ranking servant or employer whether or not they should agree to the request.
That being said, servants are people at the end of the day and might have scruples. Often, servants were far more conservative than their employers but more often that not, they would swallow their morals to do the job that is needed. This is accurately portrayed in Downton Abbey when Mrs Bird complains about Mrs Crawley asking her to wait on Ethel, a former prostitute, leading to Mrs Crawley to dismiss her.
Bonding
Because some servants work closely with an employer, relationships often evolve between employer and servant. There must be a certain level of trust between servant and employer or else the house would fall apart. Bonds do form but these bonds don't interrupt the hierarchy or the professional relationship - at least in public. For example:
A lady's maid or a valet might act as confidant to their mistress/master, keeping their secrets. This is seen in Downton Abbey where Anna and Bates act as confidants with Lady Mary and Lord Grantham respectively.
A kitchen maid may slip the children of the house an odd treat in defiance of their parents or governess.
The staff might chip in for a gift for a beloved employer on an anniversary or special occasion.
The same is said for employers, who would also show favour by gift giving or promotion.
A loyal servant might be left some money on the death of their master/mistress.
A retiring lady's maid might be granted a gift from her mistress.
Employers might listen to the advice of their servants or servants may approach employers in times of difficulty. An employer might see a servant's child educated well or might pay a doctors bill, but these are kindnesses. Because there is a certain level of proximity, certain familiarities can grow but it is unlikely that either will consider it 'friendship' exactly.
Boundaries
However, there are boundaries between servant and employer. Even in cases of familiarity and good will, a servant and employer would not meddle in each other's affairs. For example:
A servant might dislike an employer's guest but would not refuse to serve or wait on them. This is depicted inaccurately in Downton Abbey's Christmas special, where the butler Stowel refuses to serve former chauffeur Tom Branson.
An employer in some eras could not deny a servant the right to get married.
A servant may be expected to be available at any given time and come running at the sound of the bell. But if a servant is on a day off or ill, an employer can't punish them for not being available when knowing beforehand they wouldn't be.
A good servant knows when they are needed and when to disappear. They should not linger if it is clear they shouldn't be here.
A servant might see their employer engaging in harmful or immoral behaviours but would not have the right to criticise or inform anybody.
A servant might be tasked with dealing with their employer in a state of undress (but this never crossed gender, a valet or a butler would handle a naked male employer and only a female servant would deal with a lady's intimates) and while seeing them in this state, would not look or make a big deal over it.
The professional boundary should not be breached on either side of the divide. A servant wouldn't approach an employer with personal issues nor would an employer welcome the servant's unauthorised counsel.
The Downsides
This is an uneven system most times and the employer does wield a lot of power. Servants are in this dynamic because they need to survive and provide a life for themselves so often they stick out bad situations rather than risk not being able to find a job again. Servants in some eras could be physically or verbally abused without recourse. Some servants often faced harassment and sexual assault from other staff, guests and/or employers. Servants desperate to keep their positions would often keep quiet about their circumstances in order to retain their place. This is accurately portrayed in Outlander: Blood of my Blood, with Mrs Porter and Julia, along with many other possible unnamed women and girls.
Fantasy Guide to Understanding the Noble/Royal Family Dynamic
I get a lot of questions about cousins, uncles, aunts etc with noble and royal family structures so I thought I would make this post about understanding what it means to be born into these families and what it means to be involved in a family where you fall in the pecking order determines how society will see you.
Family Ties
Your importance and rank comes from your parents. It doesn't matter whether your uncle is a Duke or your second cousin is a Marquess, what comes first is the rank of your parents. This determines your place in society, your future prospects and your rank. For example, if a character's mother was born a Princess and married a Viscount, the character is not entitled to a royal title (unless granted by the Crown) but only the style of that of a Viscount's child.
Prospects
With that being said, having an important titled relative or being linked to a royal family but not being directly linked (parent-child) doesn't leave you out in the cold. Family ties are more than hierarchal and through close bonds, even a nephew or a distant cousin may get something out of the arrangement. A familial link through an uncle or aunt would elevate prospects for a character. For example, the niece of a Duke may not be titled, being the daughter of a wealthy banker but the link with the family would still allow her to participate in their lifestyle (if invited of course) or make a great marriage dye to her link with the Duke. A cousin might find the main branch to be stingy bastards or generous patrons, it is really up to main branch.
Family Tree
Close links are strongest. Aunt/Uncle, niece/nephew, grandparent/grandchild. The main branch is the title holder, their children and their grandchildren through their heir. Anybody outside of this line, are branches. For example in the English family, the sons of Edward III were all granted Dukedoms. Two of his sons went on to found the branches of York and Lancaster (so named because of said Dukedoms) who were Plantagents and later able to make claims on the throne later on but the sons of those Dukes were not styled as Princes or considered members if the royal family. They were sons of Dukes, with royal blood. This did change in later years with grandchildren in the make line being styled as HRH.
Lifestyle
Like I said above, just because you're related to the title holder doesn't link you with the grand lifestyle they may lead. Many cousins, second cousins and even nephews and nieces often lived very different lives from relatives. A Royal cousin may live a relatively normal life, living in a rented apartment with a regular 9-5 job. However, if you were close to your cousin, you may get invited on weekends on the estate or to grand society affairs.
In Terms of Inheritance
Secondary branches and distant relatives aren't in the direct line of succession so titles, lands and honours don't come to them as easily. There are instances where distant cousins and relatives inherit crowns and titles when the main branch dies out. For example in order to find a Protestant heir, the throne of Anne I went to George of Hanover. Anne inherited the throne after her sister (and her husband-cousin) died through the line of her father. So James I → Charles I → James II → Anne I. George inherited through his mother (Sophia of Hanover) who was daughter of James I's daughter, Elizabeth Stuart. George was Anne's second cousin.
Fantasy Guide to Replacing a Regime and Enstablishing A Dynasty
You have a claim to the throne. Sort of. Well, at least you think you do. And that kingdom or empire or city next to you is looking pretty good, it would be nice to have your own setup or just to add to your collection. So how do you do that exactly?
Reasoning
Let's be honest, everybody wants to rule the world. If you have a chance to sit on a throne or take a position of power, you would. Behind the want for a crown that isn't yours, there must be a secondary reasoning, a way to back up any claims that you're an invader and you don't belong on the throne. Most new dynasties who invade and depose the previous monarchs do have a back up claim. Either they are:
Distantly Related -> They have a blood claim. This means they are somehow related to a previous monarch. This can be a weak claim, either distantly, either through the female line (most inherited blood right passes through the male line) or even through an illegitimate line. Example, The Tudors, The Hanoverians, the Bourbons.
Invited -> Perhaps some nobles and powerful figures are disgruntled by the current regime and they decide that a figure either within the Kingdom or abroad might do a better job. Sometimes that person is asked to help in a succession crisis and decides that they are the best choice. Example: Edward I in Scotland and Henry II in Ireland. Lesson, do not invite the English over.
Dibs -> The holy concept of dibs was actually a valid claim to a throne. By 'right of conquest' essentially means I've taken it and now it is mine. Conquest is usually backed up by the idea that if there is a deity, they wouldn't have allowed the rightful monarch to be overthrown and this must be the will of the god(s). One may need a good propagandist to make this work.
Toolkit
To invade and overthrow any monarchy and establish your own regime, you will need the following things.
Army -> Military might or at very least support is paramount. You need an army to protect you, to beat your enemies and later on, establish control. Armies can be acquired either through allies or by raising them yourself from your lands or you can hire one - store bought is fine if you can't do homemade.
Allies -> Everybody needs a friend. No incoming monarch or invader has done so without an ally. This could be nobles within the Kingdom itself who want a regime change. This could be foreign heads of state who want to fuck up that kingdom by triggering a civil war or want to control that kingdom in the future through their puppet. Allies essentially put money, vocal support and military support behind their guy but this is always in hopes of a return: money, land, titles or just a favour in the future. Allies are essential.
Money -> Most importantly, you need money. Money is essential in taking over a throne. You need to pay your soldiers, buy ships, feed your soldiers, house them, buy allies, buy equipment and of course, but appropriate drip. You want to be king, spend like one.
PR and Propaganda -> To invade, kill a bunch of people, likely steal a lot of food and burn and pillage probably wouldn't endear you to the people. People will endure a lot of awfulness if the PR machine is working. We burned that village? When this new guy landed on our shores, there was this fuck ass comet that like had to have been sent by the god(s)? We murdered your King? Yeah, well he was a bad guy and we saved you all actually.
When the Party is over...
You have just successfully invaded the country and overthrown the previous monarch. They are either:
(A) Dead
(B) Your prisoner
(C) On the Run
All options are good and are a success but in any take over of a regime like this, only one option is left to the new monarch if they want to make sure there are no reprisals.
Kill them all.
It sounds dark and villainy and it is but if you want to establish a new dynasty, the old monarch must die along with any heirs strong enough to oppose you. As a prisoner, they are a rallying point for your enemies and dissidents. In exile, they could just pull an Uno reverse and pull the same crap on you. Levelling the playing field is the better thing to do in the long run. That's everyone even young children unfortunately. Any smart monarch would do this and anybpdy left alive would be married into the new royal family for two reasons: it both negates the bloodline of the previous royals and bolsters the claim of the new royals.
Not only royalty need to die. Any nobles or dissidents will have to be seen to. Executions usually follow regime change. Nobles who supported the last monarch and won't change allegiance? Chopped. Commons who riot over your ascension? The hangman will be busy. Advisers who advised against you or won't change their tune? Thrown out a window.
Secondly, a new monarch should get crowned as quickly as possible. It sort of puts a solid seal on everything especially if there's a religious aspect.
There is another list of things to do. This surrounds mostly taking control of major cities and ports. Take over infrastructure, control food supplies and anything the country needs to run. Install your own government with both some members of the old regime but also your own supporters too. One last thing your new monarch should do is to establish the dynasty by making powerful marriages with all available relatives and create a string of heirs in a very clear succession.
The Lost Prince | Alphabet | C is for Crown
The Crown of Vastia is the symbol of Vastia Imperial might and power. The Crown itself is a lost artifact, supposedly dismantled in the Revolution though accounts vary. Legendary for its oppulence, the Crown is over 700 years old and extremely heavy. Worn only during the coronation, the Crown's sheer weight is compounded only by it's importance to Vastia. Featuring the rarest and largest Koskam sapphires on record, diamonds mined from all corners of the kingdom along with emeralds, rubies and opals, the Crown is the culmination of Vastia's golden age of artistry.
The Lost Prince | Alphabet | B is For Brothers
Brothers and the topic of brotherhood is an important element to The Lost Prince. The relationships between both blood related siblings, those relationships forged in adventure and duty and platonic brotherhood impact the plot at various points. Brothers are lost, brothers are found and brothers fight for one another.