Realest thing I've seen today

Andulka
styofa doing anything
occasionally subtle

No title available

Origami Around

titsay
sheepfilms

⁂
almost home
Sweet Seals For You, Always
YOU ARE THE REASON
todays bird
Misplaced Lens Cap
trying on a metaphor

if i look back, i am lost
dirt enthusiast
Not today Justin

Discoholic 🪩

tannertan36
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Canada

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Argentina

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
@tuesdays-grace
Realest thing I've seen today
BAKED BLACK BEAN TACOS 🌮 👇🏾 Everyone should be eating way more beans because they’re full of fibre, protein and proper cheap too 😮 Here is a super simple, healthy and speedy way to turn black beans into beautifuly baked crispy tacos 😊 👇🏾
I don't wanna be human anymore if that is what I am, the thought of being one is hortifying and disgusting to me.
On Misanthropy
There’s a growing tendency I’ve seen in some online spaces to treat misanthropy as if it were a mental illness, a form of self-harm or even some kind of disguised bigotry. I want to push back on this idea because not only is it wrong, it erases history, flattens a lot of nuance, and ends up pathologizing people for having legitimate perspectives on humanity.
Misanthropy is not a clinical diagnosis. It is not automatically self-harm. It is not “nazism in disguise.” At its simplest, misanthropy is distrust of, dislike of, or skepticism toward humanity as a whole. That doesn’t mean it’s always wise or constructive, but it is a recognizable philosophical stance with a history stretching back to ancient Greece and beyond.
Even though the word misanthropy comes from the Greek misanthrōpos, the philosophy behind it is far older and far wider. Misanthropic themes run through humanity’s own myths and stories across cultures: flood epics where gods wipe out humans for being noisy and cruel, laments about the futility of human striving, creation cycles where humanity is destroyed and remade for its failings. Their own gods are often the first misanthropes. This isn’t new, and it certainly isn’t “white.” It’s a recurring human recognition: that humans are often the worst danger to themselves and their world.
In fact, many people became misanthropic directly because of fascism and its atrocities. To imply or claim that misanthropy is “nazi-coded” ignores genocide survivors, dissidents, and disillusioned thinkers who turned to misanthropy precisely as a response to horrors committed by human beings.
Part of the problem lies in the persistent belief that humans are inherently good. But humans are not inherently anything. They are animals – capable of cooperation, beauty, and care, and just as capable of cruelty, destruction, and atrocity.
Violence is not unique to the human animal. Chimpanzees wage brutal wars, dolphins infamously rape, insects enslave one another. But humans wield unique technology and scale. A raccoon cannot drop a nuclear bomb. Humans did, twice, on civilians. And then they justified it.
If we can learn anything from history (Hiroshima, the Holocaust, colonialism, ecological collapse-) it is that humans cannot be placed in a category of inherent goodness. And yet if we look at the helpers, the healers, the creators, we also see that humanity cannot be placed in a category of inherent evil. The truth is both simpler and more uncomfortable: humans are animals, subject to variables of circumstance, trauma, power, and choice.
Critics of misanthropy often conflate thought with action. But disliking, distrusting, or feeling alienated from humanity does not automatically translate into harming humans. In fact, misanthropy is often tied to conflict avoidance, refusing to engage with society because it feels unsafe or unworthy of trust.
When people frame misanthropy as a sort of “wrong-think,” they’re actually echoing the logic of fascism itself. Fascism thrives on the idea that there are “correct” and “incorrect” ways to think, that dissenting beliefs must be stamped out in the name of purity and unity. Policing misanthropy as though it were inherently dangerous is not liberatory, it is authoritarian.
And the irony runs even deeper: many who accuse misanthropy of being “western” or “white supremacist” reveal their own ignorance in doing so, because “Western civilization,” “Western invention,” and similar frameworks are themselves white supremacist categories. They were constructed to erase other histories, philosophies, and critiques of humanity. To claim that misanthropy is uniquely fascist or uniquely Western is not only historically inaccurate, in unwittingly reproduces the very hierarchies it pretends to resist.
It is also worth noting: people can hold thoughts they do not act on. This includes mean, violent, and even bigoted thoughts. Living in a society saturated with racism, sexism, ableism, and so forth means biased thoughts will occur. The moral difference lies in whether a person chooses to act on them. Anti-racism isn’t about never having a single racist thought; it’s about choosing resistance instead of complicity.
So when someone says “I hate humans” that is not the same as committing violence against humans. Condemning the thought itself as immoral or dangerous totally collapses this distinction, and worse, it bullies people into delusional “purity” rather than honest self-reflection.
Is misanthropy destructive for the self? Maybe. But whether a belief harms the person holding it is entirely that individual’s business. You do not get to declare that someone’s worldview is self-harm because it does not match your own coping mechanisms. For some, misanthropy is protective. It’s a way to name the danger they have lived through and a tool for their survival. To rip that away in the name of “healing” is to make them more vulnerable, not less. While you might drown trying to breathe underwater, the fish does not need to be “rescued” from the river.
Misanthropy also does not mean separating humans from nature. Quite the opposite. My stance is this: humans are animals, but they are my least favorite kind. They are the most dangerous animal, and the only one who has convinced themselves they stand above the rest of nature.
It’s not just white supremacy that led to our current ecological crisis, though white supremacy magnifies it. It’s anthropocentrism: a belief held across many cultures that the world exists for humanity’s consumption. This view has led to conquest, exploitation, and the devastation we see today.
Misanthropy is not inherently a pathology, nor is it inherently a danger. It is one way of grappling with the reality of humanity: an animal capable of both horror and beauty, but never free from the capacity for either.
I do not have to like humans. Nobody does. What matters is what you do with that perspective. Whether you use it to justify harm, or whether you use it to create distance, clarity, or even compassion in your own way.
Rejecting compulsory love of humanity is not the same thing as rejecting morality. That is projection, not Truth.
Pissed off on behalf of allo aros rn.
Your relationships are not any less because they aren't romantic. They aren't dirty or immoral or lesser for being sexual and you shouldn't have to hide them or censor yourselves. Fuck anyone who says you should.
Happy Tuesday!
Did the United Health CEO try diet and excercise? Maybe if he lost some weight he could've dodged the bullets.
In a room full of people, I would be looking for the door.
Sometimes you just need a little alone time… and rainbows.