
#extradirty
art blog(derogatory)
sheepfilms
The Stonewall Inn

Love Begins

Jimmy Eat World
Fieri Frames

@theartofmadeline
𩵠avery cochrane š©µ
KIROKAZE
The Bright Sessions
Fai_Ryy
NASA
ā
Doug Jones
Color Me Curious
EXPECTATIONS
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open

shark vs the universe
No title available

seen from Singapore

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Colombia

seen from Japan
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Venezuela
seen from France

seen from United States
seen from Türkiye

seen from United States

seen from Türkiye

seen from Dominican Republic
seen from Venezuela
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Netherlands
@twhfrustration
Say no to stereotypes, be happy everyday! [x]
Cant reblog this enough
I love that this shows both sides, how society is ingrained to see women as baby-makers and men as walking wallets whoās only worth is if they make good cash. Both are equally demeaning and limiting in different ways.Ā
Sorry but am I the only one SOBBING after Louis' interview???? So much of it just hurt my heart but a lot of it just made me even prouder and jfc I have too many emotions rn pls tell me I'm not alone
ā¦I meanā¦I liked the pictures?Ā
Iāve been thinkin about this a lot. So Iām going to elaborate.
When it comes to just about anything to do with Louis this is 100% me
And while there were definitely parts of the interview that had me wanting to cry in a very not so cool way, a lot of it just didnāt quite sit well with me. Iām not surprised with how theyāre marketing Louis, since this is the same incompetent āteamā thatās been behind his PR for years, but the content of the interview just had me like Ā
Letās focus on the positive for a momentā¦he looks incredible.
Like
But then as you start to add headlines to these photos itās gets a bitā¦eh
Louis is so incredibly talented as both a a singer and songwriter and this narrative is disappointing because when youāre trying to launch someoneās solo SINGING career, exactly what good does it do to begin a headline withĀ āNot the best singerā?Ā
Which is why when people praise this article saying how great it is Iām like
There are certainly very honest and raw moments in this article, and I do think it was well written. The parts of actual dialogue are gripping, but the way in which theyāre framed sells Louis short in my opinion. I canāt sit here and say, āWow this part was great and Iām just going to ignore all the other bits that kind of stuck out as odd to me.āĀ
They are using the same, and I mean the EXACT same, marketing tactics that they used with One Direction.
Theyāve always tried to sell him as this working class Donny lad figure, which Iām pretty sure is why his relationship with Jamie Vardy has been so heavily publicised (aside from the rumours that heāll play him in the biopic), but theyāve really made it sound like if he hadnāt made it into One Direction that heād be mining coal somewhere right nowā¦
And as ever, his image is tightly wound around a heterosexualĀ āheās takenā narrative.Ā
The difference between the use ofĀ āgirlfriendā andĀ āpartnerā is significant in that it implies permanence and adding fatherhood to that really shows how aggressively theyāre veering away from targeting a young female audience demographic in terms of traditional marketing. They managed to put all that information into this article without any actual words from Louis.
The unfortunate thing about this article, is that the two things Louis actually talked about the least are now becoming the focal point of the narrative.Ā
Like, okay. We get it. He is doing the sex with the women. And all these seemingly random pap shots and snapchat cameos are suddenly coming out of the woodwork and they still canāt get a new quote about itā¦
What concerns me is that theyāve used their first opportunity to market Louisā solo career this way. The end of the article is oddly dark and unsettlingā¦
What the hell even was that? Like a pat on the back and aĀ āGood luck kid,ā as he chain smokes into the sunset? The vibe was very
And yeah, there have been some aggressive injustices in Louisā life, no one should have to lose their mother that young and that suddenly, and I thought that part of the article was extremely well handled and verbalised. But, as someone who has appreciated Louisā talent for years now, this article really didnāt have to make his insecurities the focal point. He didnāt have to diminish his existing collaborations by saying that he couldnāt get ābig namesā in the studio with him, therefore now isolating himself from pretty much everyone in the music industry. And the fact Simon Cowell got a nod in the article was like, āHi! Iām a red flag!ā
Like, Jesus Christ, he was put in a boy band, not sent to war. And if youāre telling me that Simon Cowell canāt pick up the phone and get big name writers into a room with Louis Tomlinson then I donāt know what to say. What bothers me the most is that this entire article sounds like a regurgitated speech from Simon Cowell that he probably used to manipulate Louis over the past five years. Despite his HUGE fan base, which has made him the most engaged with celebrity on Instagram, someone is still telling Louis he isnāt a frontman, when he has a global audience telling him the exact opposite. This article makes it sound like Syco is taking some kind of chance on one of the most successful musicians of the last decade. Louis wrote more of One Directionās songs than any other member and thereās absolutely no reason to make his debut album sound more dramatic than Dunkirk. Like, āIn a world where no one believed in himā¦Louis Tomlinson had to learn to believe in himselfā¦COMING SUMMER 2017!āĀ
Ugh. It just⦠ Ā
Anyway, Iām crying in a cool way over how gorgeous Louis looks here as a dramatic cat lady.Ā
And now itās time to sashay away. Thanks for listening!
āā¦And then thereās me.ā Ā I asked his fans to describe Louis in one word, hereās the result. (some words are repetitive because I put every word that people used to describe him, the repetitive ones are by different people mentioned again +click to enlarge)
āŖYouāll always be missed š¼š¼šā¬ āŖ#RIPJohanna #RIPRobinā¬
1D Hiatus: Day 555
* Liam posts a picture on Instagram
* Steve and Louis are nominated forĀ āChoice Collaborationā,Ā āSign of the Timesā andĀ āSlow Handsā are nominated in the same category - āChoice Song: Male Artistā, and Harry is nominated forĀ āChoice Rock Artistā andĀ āChoice Male Artistā at this yearās Teen Choice Awards
* Harry is featured on NME magazine
* More pictures of Harry with fans in Mallorca last weekend come out
* The charity single for the Grenfell Tower fire victims will be played at radio stations in the UK tomorrow at 8AM UK time
* Matthew Brookes posts a picture from Liamās album cover photoshoot on Instagram
* The Rolling Stone magazine features Harryās debut album on their list of the 50 best albums of 2017 so far
Itās Jun 20th, 2017.
On this day a year ago: #190
So proud of my mother for doing her own research after I sent her that meme. A sign she hung in her car window.
Stay woke
Is this true?
Not only is it true, it gets worse. The Susan G Komen For The Cure Foundation has actually successfully sued ācompetingā charities, becauseĀ (paraphrasing)Ā their āmessage or branding was infringing.ā
You read that correctly: they took money that people had donated to cure cancer, and hired attorneys with it, to sue ANOTHER group of people trying to find a cure for cancer, who, in turn, had to us their donated money to hire their own legal counsel to defend themselves.
Yeah signal boost because not enough people know about this and seriously FUCK SUSAN G. KOMEN THEY ARE THE ACTUAL WORST
Some linksā¦
http://thinkbeforeyoupink.org/
http://www.somethingawful.com/feature-articles/for-the-cure/
http://thestir.cafemom.com/in_the_news/132728/susan_g_komen_foundation_has
(reblogged in honor of my mother, who died of breast cancer, 11/13/97)
Reblog every time I see it. Roughly once a month.
Also please never forget the pink fracking drill bit
thatās right fracking you know, a process using chemicals known to cause cancer that leech into the water supply
http://www.triplepundit.com/2014/10/baker-hughes-fights-breast-cancer-pink-fracking-drill-bits/
http://www.nbcnews.com/health/cancer/pink-drill-bits-bring-complaints-komen-tie-fracking-n223166
Itās that time of year again, please remember Komen is the actual worst
Komen For The Cure is pretty much awful.
My mother died in 1996 from breast cancer. Most cancer charities are scams, in that people throw fancy parties and get rich off them and very little money goes into research or support for patients. Here are some vetted cancer charities that get good scores on Charity Navigator and pay medical expenses or fund research:
Breast Cancer Research Foundation
Cancer Research Institute
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
63 four star rated cancer charities on charity navigator
Signal boosting this
Is all of this a tooty fruity illusion covered in sprinkles? So, so, so many sprinkles?
Richard Attenborough Memorial Service (March 17, 2015)Ā
Getty
The eyebrow in #1.
It MOVES??!?! Iāve only seen the still from thisā¦
@nicholette831 @caitykitty722 @hiddlestonedonloki @musicfashionandscotch @tinaferraldo @all2idid4was6steal0some1bread @twhfrustration @eshahiddlebatch @l0ki-0f-asgard @cutenerfherder
What the fuck.. I haven't seen these either.. Oh God.. The eyebrow in #1 and the mouth movement in #2 what the fuck.. It's too early in the morning for this..
Philadelphiaās new pride flag honors LGBTQ people of color
follow @the-movemnt
Honestly I think this is awesome, symbols should be as dynamic as the needs of our communities, we should not be afraid to change them whenever we feel it is needed.
And while this is symbolic and doesnāt immediately translate to real change, the messages it sends, both āPOC are Hereā and āRacists not welcomeā are important.
All the white people flipping out about this because they think itās not beautiful or not traditional or not a rainbow as it appears in nature are showing how used they are to a sheltered condition of not having to seriously consider the needs of people of color, because they think an esthetic matters more than the question of whether this is an effective way to adress a real issue. How did we get to a point where that level of apathy is normal?
So I support this. Heck, Iād support it if we wrote āRACISTS FUCK OFFā in large print on every single pride flag until the day when we didnāt have a single racist left in our communities. That would be worth changing all our symbols for.
An important thread on Obstruction of Justice
There you go. This was the best summary for those that couldnāt or didnāt follow our live tweets and posts. THIS is what happened in the James Comey Testimony.
Something Iāve been wanting to explore for a while now - The differences between the UK and US education systems.Ā (Spurred by one of my friendās claiming America has it harder, and the decision to explore this fact. Basically, itās a bit of a rant.)
I think the main assumption that U.S. exams are difficult is the fact that you need to get 97-98% on exams to get an A+, whereas A* in England require 90%. Coupled with the fact that Aās in the US are 90-92% upwards, whereas in England you only need 80%, at first glance it could be seen that American exams are harder.
But the main difference isnāt the mark schemes. Itās the way exams are held. As far as research shows me, American grades go towards your GPA, from 0.00 to 4.00 (5.00 in some states). The exams you take, accumulating over middle school and high school go towards your final grades when you graduate high school or apply for college.
These exams are based on school terms / semesters, and are accumulative. And, if my research is right, students in the U.S have the capability of retaking tests if they donāt do well.
Apparently Americans study 6-8 subjects and each exam is an hour, with half of the exam being multiple choice and the other being a written essay.
However, in England, our exams take place at the end of our courses. GCSEās from ages 14-16, and A-levels from 16-18. We start our two year course and take all of our exams at the end of it: Thereās usually 2-3 exams per subject.
During GCSEās, I personally took 9 subjects, with a total of 22 exams at the end of my course over June and July. The average exam is 90 minutes, so I had on average 33 hours of exams for GCSEās on a whole. (Thatās excluding the 18-hour drama exam I had to take).
People in UK donāt get to retake GCSE exams - the only retakes schools push for are those who get below a C in English or Mathematics - and they donāt get to retake A-level exams anymore.
At A-levels in the U.K, you typically study 3-4 subjects, in depth with a range of sub-groups. Personally Iām studying, Sociology / Psychology / English Literature and Language, each forcing me into 3 exams. Thatās 18 hours of exams over a 3 week time period.
Okay Mint, you say, where are you going with this.
Give me a moment, I have a point.
In my psychology course, I have to learn 11 topics in depth. In just one topic, itās necessary to be able to recall over 20 names, each with specific studies and specific evaluation. Thatās 220 names for just PSYCHOLOGY.
Sociology, luckily, only has 5 topics. Sadly, you need about 50-60 names /studies/evaluation for 4 of those topics specifically, and you need to have about 40 extra names and studies to evaluation any question with. Thatās an additional 240-280 names.
Thatās up to 500 names that are necessary to remember to pass the course. All that need to be remembered over a 3 week exam period. All that are required to get marks. No multiple choice questions - well, maybe 6 multiple choice questions in all of psychology - because everything is essay based over here.
And then, to top it off, most of the English exams over here are closed book, meaning I have to be able to quote by memory and then analyse these quotes. Cramming, is practically impossible - they got rid of yearly exams three years ago, meaning retakes in second year of A-levels is impossible.
And universities donāt give concrete places. They give offers and if you donāt get the grades they say theyāll take you for, then oops youāve got to go through clearing.
Thereās a point to all this knowledge other than complaining about the exams Iām currently suffering through. Itās the place a point to the percentages necessary for grades that I pointed out earlier.
The grade boundaries are lower in the U.K because retakes are unheard of. Since we need to remember so much, need to recall over 500 names / 4 books / 50 poems, the grade boundaries give a little leeway for itās students. If you make the percentages too high, then only two or three people would ever pass.
The grade boundaries in the U.S. then, are higher, since everything is on an accumulative scale. You give in essays and take tests that go towards a final GPA. Retakes are possible if necessary. Grade boundaries are higher since you study for one test per subject at a time.
Listen - Iām not saying either system is harder. (Although, if Iāve got you thinking one way or the other, thatās okay. Iāve got my own personal view on this that Iām not gonna go into right now).
Iām saying both systems are COMPLETELY different. Itās impossible to say that one is more difficult than the other without having studied both. U.S has higher grade boundaries, but that doesnāt mean that those getting those grades are any smarter than those studying in the U.K.
Letās just say that both systems suck. And that weāre all suffering.
(Also, Iām not sure about America, but in the U.K, a lot of people say that A-levels are actually harder than the degrees we go into. Mostly because itās all at the end of 2 years, whereas universities test after every term.)
If Iāve gotten anything about the U.S education system wrong, please tell me and Iāll adjust it! And whatās everyone elseās experience with the schooling system. Do you think you have it easier or harder?
Political Post - UK
The UK General Elections are tomorrow, and I just wanted to say something. Having Theresa May as PM will be terrifying and potentially ruin the country.
Let me make a few points, in no particular order.
1) She wants to abolish the Human Rights Act to ābetter combat terrorismā.
Implication here is that sheās willing to torture to get want she wants. Torture does not work. People get tortured because you believe they have useful information. You wonāt believe them if they truthfully donāt know. They will eventually tell you exactly what you want to hear, even if itās false, just so youāll stop. Even it doesnāt lead to torture, anyone could be arrested and held indefinitely without ever receiving a trial. It may initially get used for terrorists or terrorist suspects, but how long until itās used on āsuspected sympathisersā Ā who may happen to live on the same street as a terror suspects. Then how long until itās ends up used on anyone whoās against the party in power? All protesters, even peaceful ones, could end up arrested and locked up for life without receiving a trial.
2) She says Britain and its police force is not prepared to combat terrorism.
Before David Cameron resigned, Theresa May was the Home Secretary, and had been for the entirety of the Conservative Government. It was her job to make sure Britain was prepared for terrorist attacks and to prevent them happening. She basically got rid of, I believe, 10,000 officers and cut the funding to the police. How can the police effectively combat anything when they physically donāt have the officers to do it?
3) She wants the Government to be able to monitor everything everyone does online āto prevent terrorist attacksā
For this to happen, sheād have to go all-in. She canāt just pick and choose. She wants to get rid of all cryptography on the internet, so those who bank online, your information is now vulnerable and up for grabs to anyone who wants it. All websites would have to be authorised by the UK Government, so no Youtube, or Netflix or Dailymotion, etc. Also any website criticising the government or the Conservative party would be instantly closed down. Ā All technology would have to be approved by the UK Government, so nothing could be bought or developed abroad, all foreign visitors would have to surrender their smart phones, tablets, etc., upon entry. She wants companies like Whatsapp and Facebook to create back-doors to allow the Government to see what people are doing. If the way exists, it will only be a matter of time until criminals find a way to use them and cryptographyās gone so once theyāre in, thereās nothing to stop them. Say goodbye to any privacy on Whatsapp, or Facebook, or forums, or chatrooms, or Tumblr, or even games like World of Warcraft where even if you could still play, you wouldnāt be able to play with someone whoās not in the UK.
4) Funding to schools will be cut.
The amount of funding schools receive will be cut by hundreds of pounds per pupil. Teachers are overworked as it is. More teachers will quit as rising living costs, and slow salary growth for most of the general population, will make it too hard to make a living as a teacher. Schools themselves will have less money to spend on hiring and paying teachers. The quality of childrenās education will drop as thereāll be less teachers available, and all of those will have to work even longer hours. They claim there will be a Ā£4 billion fund for schools to draw from to counteract the hit from the cuts. In that case, why make the cuts in the first place, if youāre just going to provide a relief fund anyway? Also, this Ā£4 billion will only be raised by making cuts elsewhere suchs as in NHS funding.
I donāt know if any of the people who read this post are able to vote in the UK general election, but if you are, I ask that you vote for any other party. Vote for Labour, SNP, Plaid Cymru, whoever, I donāt care, just please do not vote Conservative.
āWhat has the European Convention on Human Rights ever done for us?ā