umi on main

I know the algebraic expression of LO-O-OVE

[umi-on-main]

MINORS DO NOT INTERACT.

NOTICE: if i seem like a random follow, this is the primary blog on this account! i might have a sideblog that interests you!

umi | they/them | 26 the world's horniest ace

about me | yap tag | oc yap tag

SIDEBLOGS:

@ainoumi-blog -> art blog. creative works goes here. @sharkgummiisims -> ts4 simblr. @chewyx3 -> ts4 cc finds and other resources. @feverishuproar -> OC blog for my oc Mei "Samus" Kitten. @aroaceflux-eggman -> yumeship/selfship blog (on a separate account)

[egorenegadeboi]

if a marginalized man starts talking about his struggles and you make it about how much you hate men you are not a good person tbh

[umi-on-main]

finally gonna see what soju is all about

[umi-on-main]

its very peachy, kinda has a bite at the end.

i am drunk and i am onl;y halfway through the bottle

[umi-on-main]

umi's soju post mortem:

soju is some wild stuff. the memes were not kidding.

[swagophile]

important reminder that most people you follow online are significantly lamer than you think they are including me. and if you feel insecure comparing yourself to someone online: DON'T. theyre probably also lame and weird. most people on the internet are

[most-sane-classicist]

reblog if you're also lame and weird.

[umi-on-main]

Ama ey? 👀

Fave version of Eggman?

Fave way for Stone to make you a drink?

If you could use the chaos emeralds for any purpose what would it be?

Have you borrowed Stone's suit jacket? How about Eggman's? Have you surprised both while wearing their attire?

Oops I asked a bunch 😅🎶

KICKS MY FEET GIGGLING. for those who dont know here on main, i do selfship myself with both eggman and agent stone <3

favorite version of eggman is jim carrey... sorry LOL. i do love all versions of eggman, but jimbotnik hits all the right buttons

stone to make me a drink... i guess a piña colada. i recall having one on a family cruise, and it was divine~

chaos emeralds... maybe to improve my health? im not actually sure... ^^; thats a lot of power.

AND YES. YES YES YES YES FOR SURE. yesssss i steal their clothes all the time girl. im The Clothes Stealer:tm:

im sure they have been surprised. like, "i thought you didnt think much of this garment??" but SURPRISE. i like it because it smells like them heehee

[umi-on-main]

weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee ask me anything heehee

[umi-on-main]

finally gonna see what soju is all about

[umi-on-main]

its very peachy, kinda has a bite at the end.

i am drunk and i am onl;y halfway through the bottle

[umi-on-main]

finally gonna see what soju is all about

[perverted-asexual]

Literally maddening that people are trying to frame being against the social media bans for kids and ID verification requirements as pedophilic and predatory.

Its not that I necessarily want kids everywhere in these spaces but I don't want to have to prove I'm not one. I don't want people without IDs to not be able to access whole sections of the Internet. I don't want people who do have IDs to have to constantly have to give up their information to random websites with risks of cyber breaches.

It's not that I think all kids exclusively benefit from being online and that theres not flaws and dangers to it. But I do think that closeted trans kid who can't come out irl should be able to find community and learn they're not alone. I do think that kids in closed off communities who may not interact with certain marginalised communities or who's parents are actively against them should have a place to talk to real people and learn.

I think that it sure is questionable timing to put everything behind an ID requirement and age restriction when social media is one of the main and few ways to get news that isn't hidden behind a pay wall and learn about the things that the mainstream papers aren't going to bother covering.

But sure, I just "don't care about the safety of children"

[heartsl0b]

melbourne laundrette / brooklyn bodega

[sapphling]

and honestly it's just fucking insane that every time we try to talk about harm to children in particular we have to talk circles around the fact that these things are very, very overwhelmingly done by parents/family members/teachers/religious leaders/known and trusted adults in a position of power over a child, to the extent that many people's suggested solution to child abuse is "give the people most likely to abuse a child EVEN MORE strangling legal and material power over the kid"

[sapphling]

you're not supposed to actually address who is abusing children and what can be done to give those children recourse and the ability to leave abusive situations because nobody actually gives a shit about child abuse beyond the familial property rights violation it represents to them and the cudgel against minorities which it can be turned into

[ticklebait]

when you talk shit about drug addicts who aren’t “functioning members of society” you are talking shit about disabled people. this is not up for debate.

[ticklebait]

happy disability pride month to addicts

[dailyspicyfigures]

Ryousai-chan ; Original Character ☆ Party Look

[radical-eve]

[ironbound-oberon]

I have cochlear implants and I can only buy parts to fix them or upgrade then from 1 corporation bc of tech exclusivity. upgrades to get new processors for both ears cost $23k & insurance only covers 90% (and it’s “good” insurance)

cyberpunk dystopia is already here for the disabled. fight for universal healthcare, fight against capitalism NOW.

[athelind]

Cyberpunk dystopia is already here for the disabled.

[morweneclipsed]

the KIDS act passed the house today. 267-117, 47 not voting.

that's not great. but it's not the whole story.

a few things got worse right before the vote too. the language that explicitly protected encryption, saying the bill couldn't be used to force platforms to weaken it, got quietly stripped out on Friday. that safeguard just doesn't exist anymore.

but this isn't over. it heads to the senate next, and the senate is genuinely not on board. blumenthal and cantwell, two of the senators who wrote the original KOSA, are saying they don't want this version near a markup. blackburn, a republican and the other original author, called the missing duty of care provision a red line.

worth being clear here, blackburn isn't on our side. she wants the policy stronger, not gone. but that's still a crack we can use. her opposition means the house version has zero guaranteed path through the senate as written, and a stalled bill is a bill that isn't law yet. use her objection, don't trust her motive.

senate commerce hasn't even scheduled a markup yet. that's the next pressure point. this thing has died or gotten majorly rewritten at this stage before.

contact your senators: find yours here. tell them you don't want the house version anywhere near a vote.

and remember, if you have to, contact your senators scared. anything helps.

this fight isn't lost. it's just moved.

[dyrdeer]

Honey prefers pandas

comm for @atrox-tempestas!! THANK U SO MUCH

[processintegrated]

I went to a dog show the other day. A Yorkie took Best in Show, a Jack Russell took second, and a Scotty took third. I’m starting to think the judges had some sort of All-Terrier motive.